AP GOV Unit 7 The Supreme Court

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/69

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 12:42 AM on 4/15/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

70 Terms

1
New cards

Litigation

process of taking legal action; bringing/filing a lawsuit against a person/institution

2
New cards

Jurisdiction

official power to make legal decisions and judgement

3
New cards

Amicus Curie Briefs

letters written to the court in support of one side of the case

4
New cards

Civil Liability

cities (tax payers) must pay for the conduct of its employees

5
New cards

Petitioner

party that lost at the lower level; role = state why lower courts are wrong

6
New cards

Respondent

party that won at the lower level; role = state why the lower court is right

7
New cards

Madbury v. Madison

established judicial independence and judicial review

8
New cards

Judicial Review

power of the supreme court to strike down a law/executive action if its unconstitutional; declare a law unconstitutional

9
New cards

Circuit Split

disagreement between 2+ U.S. Courts of Appeals (federal circuits, republican and democrats) because they have reached conflicting rulings on the same legal issue

10
New cards

Original Intent

courts should follow the constitution as the framers intended

11
New cards

Living Document

constitution must grow and adapt

12
New cards

Strict Construction

courts should not reinterpret the constitution

13
New cards

Loose Construction

courts should read constitution expansively and not limit themselves to what’s stated

14
New cards

Judicial Restraint

courts must interpret the law and not legislate new policies

15
New cards

Judicial Activism

courts should overturn bad laws and create new ones

16
New cards

Prior Restraint

most serious form of censorship; gov. preventing speed/publication before it occurs on the grounds that it will threaten/endanger national security

17
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines

first amendment and symbolic speech; students have first amendment rights at school as long as it is not disruptive of the learning environment

18
New cards

Clear and Present Danger

[legal standard] that speech posing an immediate/serious threat to national security is not protected by the first amendment

19
New cards

Schenck v. United States

first amendment and political speech; gov. can restrict speech that represents “clear and present danger”

20
New cards

New York Times Company (NYT) v. United States

first amendment and freedom of the press; gov. must demonstrate sufficient interest to justify prior restraint

21
New cards

Wisconsin v. Yoder

first amendment and free exercise clause; individuals expressing deeply held religion outweigh state laws (requiring proven way of life)

22
New cards

Engel v. Vitale

first amendment and establishment clause; school sponsored prayer violates establishment clause, gov. neutrality in religion

23
New cards

Free Exercise Clause

prohibits gov. from interfering with an individuals practice of religion

24
New cards

Establishment Clause

prohibits gov. from establishing a shared state church, and favoring one religion over another/favoring religion over no religion

25
New cards

Concurring Opinion

opinion that agrees with majority decision with different reasoning than the precedent

26
New cards

Plessy v. Ferguson

guarantees political equality, but not social

27
New cards

Brown v. Board of Education (I)

racial segregations in school is unequal and unconstitutional; desegregated educational facilities

28
New cards

Brown v. Board of Education (II)

how and when should schools desegregate? assigned as a lower federal court issue; most african american students remained in segregated schools

29
New cards

Equal Protection Clause

clause in the 14th amendment; civilly protects americans from discrimination based on race, national origin, religion, gender, etc.

30
New cards

De Jure Segregation

separation of individuals based on their characteristics (race) by law

31
New cards

De Facto Segregation

separation of individuals based on their characteristics, not by law (residential housing projects)

32
New cards

Civil Rights Act of 1964

outlaws racial segregation in schools and public spaces; authorizes attorney general to sue school districts if they don’t desegregate

33
New cards

Americans with Disabilities Act

guarantees people with disabilities aren’t discriminated in employment, buying goods and services, and participating in government programs

34
New cards

Affirmative Action

addresses the consequences of previous discrimination by providing special and specific consideration based on characteristics (race)

35
New cards

Title IX of the Higher Education Amendments of 1972

prohibits gender discrimination in schools receiving federal aid (reason of increased girl participation in sport programs)

36
New cards

Civil Disobedience

intentionally refusing to a obey a law to call attention to its injustice

37
New cards

Symbolic Speech

protected expression in the form of images, signs, and symbols

38
New cards

Freedom/Right of Expression

fundamental right affirmed by the first amendment to speak, publish, and protest

39
New cards

Gitlow v. New York

advocated for the violent overthrow of the government with no direct/concrete action; begins “Incorporation Doctrine”

40
New cards

Selective Incorporation

doctrine though the 14th amendment; affirming (almost all) protections in the bill of rights to the states

41
New cards

Felony

crime punished up to a 1+ years in prison

42
New cards

Gideon v. Wainwright

6th amendment; the right/guarantee to legal counsel (attorney/lawyer)

43
New cards

6th Amendment

bill of rights guarantees defendants the right to a speedy trial

44
New cards

8th Amendment

protects against imposing excessive bails and fines, or cruel and unusual punishment

45
New cards

Right to Petition the Government for Redress

lobbying, emailing, writing letters, calling members of congress, testifying in congress, collecting signatures for a ballot measure

46
New cards

2nd Amendment

right to bear arms

47
New cards

McDonald v. Chicago

ruling that handgun prohibition violates the 2nd amendment; 14th makes 2nd applicable to the states

48
New cards

14th Amendment

citizens have equal protection and due process under the law

49
New cards

4th Amendment

no search without a warrant

50
New cards

Exclusionary Rule

any evidence obtained without a warrant isn’t valid in court

51
New cards

Mapp v. Ohio

4th amendment; inappropriate content found during a search without a warrant, all evidence seized without a warrant is unconstitutional and cannot be used

52
New cards

5th Amendment

protects individuals in legal proceedings; no self-incrimination, double jeopardy, and guarantees due process

53
New cards

Due Process

government cannot deprive “life, liberty, or property” without fair legal procedures

54
New cards

Grand Jury

group of people who decide whether or not someone should be indicted on criminal charges and tried in court; “jury duty”

55
New cards

Miranda Rights

the right to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning; MUST be given by police to individuals in custody

56
New cards

Libel

untrue statement injuring someone reputation

57
New cards

Slander

untrue spoken expression injuring someones reputation

58
New cards

Double Jeopardy

protects someone from being charged with the same crime in the same jurisdiction

59
New cards

McCulloch v. Maryland (FEDERALISM)

declares that congress has implied powers necessary to implement its enumerated powers and establish its supremacy; federal laws over state laws

60
New cards

United States v. Lopez (FEDERALISM)

congress may not use the commerce clause to make gun possession in a school zone a federal crime; importance of state sovereignty and local control

61
New cards

Buckley v. Valeo

government can limit outside campaign contributions, but cannot limit what a campaign can spend; transparency in campaign finance

62
New cards

Citizens United v. FEC

money is speech, the more speech the better; corporations are people too. political spending by corporations, associations, and labor unions is a form of protected speech (under 1st amendment)

63
New cards

Baker v. Carr

federal courts should hear cases alleging states drawing of electoral boundaries/districts; judicial oversight on redistricting

64
New cards

Redistricting

drawing districts based on population

65
New cards

Shaw v. Reno

race redistricting is held to strict scrutiny (under the 14th amendment); getting rid of race based gerrymandering

66
New cards

Strict Scrutiny

evaluating the constitutionality of government actions

67
New cards

Gerrymandering

drawing a district to benefit one party for power gain

68
New cards

Middle or Intermediate Scrutiny

gender

69
New cards

Strict Scrutiny

race discrimination

70
New cards

Rational Basis Standard

differential treatment must be shown to be reasonable (age, disability)