1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Overview
Used moral dilemmas
Analysed reasoning behind responses
Identified 3 stages of moral reasoning each with two sub stages
Intelligence is more about the processes you use to arrive your answers at rather than the answers themselves
Can learn more about human reasoning by understanding how people reach their conclusions
Heinz Dillemma
It centers on a man named Heinz who must decide whether to steal an overpriced, life-saving drug to save his dying wife, forcing a conflict between the legal right to property and the moral right to life.
Should he have taken the drug? Was stealing it right or wrong and why? Would a good husband do it? Do they have a right to charge so much why and why not?
Moral Development Theory - Preconventional Morality
Judgements are based on external authorities and the actions consequences determine whether it is good or bad
Motivated by Self-Interest
Stage 1: Obedience/Punishment
Avoid punishment, focus on consequences rather than intentions
Obey authority
Stage 2: Individualism and Exchange
Right behaviours are those that are in best intersest of oneself (tit for tat)
Seek rewards
Serve own needs
Reciprocal benefit
Typical Age
Up to about 9 years
Moral Development Theory - Conventional Morality
Normative behaviour is good and non-normative behaviour is bad (peer group is reference for evaluating behaviour)
Motivated by Social Approval & Rules
Stage 3: Interpersonal Relationships
Good Boy/Nice Girl attitude
Gain approval
Avoid disapproval (sees individuals as filling social roles)
Be “good”
Stage 4: Authority and Social order
Follow laws (highest ideals)
Maintain social order with social obedience
Avoid guilt
Typical Period
Late childhood and early adolescence
Moral Development Theory - Postconventional Morality
Personal authority emerges in which an individual makes choices based on self chosen/universal principles
Motivated by Abstract Moral Principles
Stage 5: Social Contract
Laws exist for good of society and is contingent on culture
Commitment to fair rules
Stage 6: Universal Ethical Principles
Follow personal moral principles, above the law
Even if rules/laws are broken
Few people reach this level
Criticisms
Main Criticisms
Focuses on reasoning, not actual behaviour
People may know right from wrong but act differently
Western cultural bias
Cultural Criticism
Emphasises individual reasoning
Some cultures prioritise:
Community values
Respect for elders