#4 Judicial Review (guest speaker)

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/38

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 6:07 AM on 4/27/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

39 Terms

1
New cards

Where are NEPA lawsuits generally filed?

In Federal District Court

2
New cards

Which district court covers Northern California?

The Northern District of California

3
New cards

What is the next step after a District Court decision?

Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals

4
New cards

Which Court of Appeals covers California?

The Ninth Circuit (based in San Francisco)

5
New cards

Do parties have a right to appeal to the Court of Appeals?

Yes, it is a guaranteed (free) right

6
New cards

What is the final level of appeal in the federal system?

The U.S. Supreme Court

7
New cards

Is there a guaranteed right to appeal to the Supreme Court?

No, the Court chooses which cases to hear

8
New cards

How common are NEPA cases at the Supreme Court level?

Extremely rare (only about a dozen cases)

9
New cards

Venue shopping

Choosing a court location likely to be more favorable to your case

10
New cards

What is notable about the Ninth Circuit Court?

It is the largest circuit in the U.S. and often handles controversial cases

11
New cards

What are the two jurisdictional elements required for a federal lawsuit?

Cause of action and justiciability

12
New cards

What is a “cause of action”?

Legal authority that allows you to bring a lawsuit

13
New cards

Justiciability

Whether a case is appropriate for a court to decide

14
New cards

What does the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) allow courts to review?

Whether agency actions are arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or not in accordance with law

15
New cards

What procedural issue can courts review under the APA?

Whether the agency failed to follow required procedures

16
New cards

What is required to establish standing?

A real case or controversy and a specific injury caused by the action

17
New cards

What types of injuries qualify for standing?

Both physical and aesthetic injuries

18
New cards

Why must standing be clearly explained?

To show the court you have a valid reason to bring the lawsuit

19
New cards

What remedies are available in NEPA cases?

Injunctions (preliminary or permanent) and writs of mandate

20
New cards

Are monetary damages typically awarded?

No, except sometimes legal fees

21
New cards

Where do CEQA cases begin?

California Superior Court (county level)

22
New cards

What is the next level after Superior Court?

California Courts of Appeal

23
New cards

Is there a guaranteed right to appeal in CEQA cases?

No

24
New cards

What is the highest court in California for CEQA cases?

The California Supreme Court

25
New cards

What special requirement exists for CEQA cases in large counties?

Judges may specialize in CEQA cases

26
New cards

Why can CEQA cases be challenging for judges?

They involve complex, technical, and lengthy documents

27
New cards

How often are CEQA decisions challenged?

Less than 1% of cases

28
New cards

Do courts usually side with agencies?

Yes, but not always

29
New cards

What are the time limits for filing CEQA lawsuits?

  • 35 days after a Notice of Exemption

  • 30 days after a Notice of Determination

30
New cards

What did Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) establish?

CEQA should be interpreted to provide the fullest possible environmental protection

31
New cards

What triggered the Richardson Grove lawsuits?

Alleged CEQA and NEPA violations related to a highway project

32
New cards

What is a preliminary injunction?

A court order temporarily halting a project

33
New cards

Why did the federal court halt the project?

Due to concerns about inaccurate environmental data and analysis

34
New cards

What did the court find wrong with Caltrans’ analysis?

It was arbitrary and capricious due to data inaccuracies

35
New cards

What did the federal court require Caltrans to do?

Revise its environmental assessment with corrected data

36
New cards

What does a CEQA court evaluate?

The adequacy of the environmental document, not whether conclusions are correct

37
New cards

What did the state court conclude about environmental impacts?

Substantial evidence supported a finding of no significant effects

38
New cards

What issue did the court identify with mitigation?

A lack of a proper reporting and monitoring program

39
New cards

What did the court order Caltrans to do?

Develop a reporting and monitoring program