1/42
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
International Humanitarian Law
Regulate conduct of armed conflict (only applies to armed conflict). 2 principles: limit use of violence and protect those who do not participate (POWs, civilians/sick or wounded personnel)
Basic Rule of International Humanitarian Law
Principle of distinction between civilian and combatant population/objectives
Two Conventions of International Humanitarian Law (Geneva 1949 and Hague 1907)
Outlaws certain weapons causing suffering such as poison gas, discharge/explosives, and protection of persons who do not participate in armed conflict
Protocol 1 (1977)
Protocol of Geneva Convention relating to victims of International Armed Conflict (IAC)
Protocol 2 (1977)
Protocol of Geneva Convention relating to victims of Non-International Armed Conflict (NIAC)
Protocol 3 (1977)
Adoption of Additional Distinctive Emblem (red crystal) to identify medical and humanitarian personell
Geneva Conventions type of IL
Customary International Law (binding for every state)
Armed Conflict
Whenever there is a resort to armed force between states or protracted armed violence between government authorities and organized crime groups / NSAs. Bound by International Humanitarian Law even if you are an NSA. NIAC vs. IAC
Non-International Armed Conflict (NIAC)
Criteria: minimum intensity, minimum level of organization, casualties. Not every hostility is NIAC. Very recent phenomenon for Intl law to regulate NIAC.
Common Article 3
Identical for all Geneva Conventions, forbids murder, torture, hostage-taking, and humiliating treatment against persons not active in hostilities.
Combatant Immunity
Combatants cannot be punished for lawful war acts. Not the case for fighters and rebels. E.g. lethal force
Military Necessity
Principle that justifies use of all means necessary to defeat the enemy as quickly as possible which are not prohibited by the laws of war
Equal Application
Laws of war apply equally to all who are entitled to participate directly in hostilities. Does not matter which side is victim or agressor
Rival proposition for equal application
rights/obligations of combatants should apply unequally depending on victim/agressor status
Proportionality
Prohibit attacks that may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life which is excessive in relation to concrete and military objective
POW Status
Reserved for combatants, not civilians or insurgents. Detained until end of active phase of hostility, meant to prevent return to battlefield. In NIAC, can keep insurgents detained without trial, did this with Al-Qaeda.
4 Conditions for combatants (Aldrich)
Military hierarchy, have worn uniforms / distinctive signs (failed), carried arms openly, conducted military operations in accordance with laws/customs (failed)
Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld
President George W. Bush lacked authorization to establish military commissions to try Guantanamo Bay detainees. The Court held these commissions violated the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and the Geneva Conventions. Violates Common Article 3
1921 Leipzig Trials
first international war crimes proceedings, held at Germany's Supreme Court to try German personnel for WWI atrocities under Allied pressure
Crimes against peace
Not clearly criminalized, crime of aggression, high-ranking soldiers plan and start a war. Typically military
War crimes
Violations of laws and customs of war, more clearly criminalized. E. g. targeting civilians, mistreating prisoners of war.
Crimes against humanity
Murder, enslavement, extermination, etc. Less clearly criminalized. Only committed in armed conflict, only on civilians.
International Court of Justice
principal judicial organ of the United Nations, established in 1945 and based in The Hague, Netherlands. It settles legal disputes between sovereign states and provides advisory opinions on legal questions referred by UN agencies.
International Criminal Court
the first permanent international tribunal established in 1998 to prosecute individuals for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and aggression. Governed by the Rome Statute, it acts as a court of last resort, complementing national legal systems when they are unwilling or unable to prosecute
Hybrid Tribunal
Tribunal applying both domestic and international law, operates as part of national institutions with international origin, and resort to international experts.
Concurrent jurisdiction
ICT thinks its better to deal with crime, so it orders national court to shift to internationals courts
Head of State Immunity Doctrine
Sitting heads of state have immunity in international customary law, such as al-Bashir of Sugan
Security council referral
UNSC refers situation to the prosecutor of ICC
State referral
States refers situation to prosecutor of ICC
Proprio motu
Prosecutor initiates independent investigation
Sovereign Equality of States
enshrined in Article 2(1) of the UN Charter, holding that all states possess equal legal rights, duties, and standing, regardless of their size, wealth, or power. It ensures all nations have equal sovereignty and sovereignty-based protection. Can’t impose jurisdiction of court, state has to consent
Consent ad hoc
Jurisdiction by special agreement (compromis)
Consent post hoc
Forum pregatorum, jurisdiction must be explicit or clearly to be deduced from conduct of state
Advance consent
Compromissory clauses in treaties signal this jurisdiction
Compromissory clause
provision in a treaty or international agreement where state parties consent in advance to submit future disputes regarding its interpretation or application to a binding third-party body, typically the International Court of Justice (ICJ) or arbitration.
Monetary Gold Principle
legal interests of third party form subject matter of a decisions, the ICJ could not entertain proceedings
Article 94 of UN Charter
Other party, if party fails to perform obligations, may have recourse to SC
Advisory opinions
legal opinion issued by court in response to request from authorized international body. Not legally binding, but provides authoritative interpretations and clarifications of legal questions
Arbitration
States can choose judges, arbitrators, make proceedings confidential
Confiscation
Stealing of central bank assets, meant to punish the state, irreversible, was meant for investment for Ukraine
Ad hoc diplomacy
temporary ambassadors sent specially from one sovereign to another, special envoys for particular matters. Advantages: operate in absence of diplomatic relations, direct access to highest political leadership, low risk of affecting long term embassy function
Resident diplomacy
permanent ambassadors which stay in state. Becomes norm in 16th century, and 17th saw rise of rules of immunity of ambassadors
1961 Vienna Conference