1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What is the trend in ATOMIC RADIUS across period 3 [4]?
Decreases.
N.o. protons increases, the n.o. electron shells stays the same.
So there is an increased nuclear charge.
A greater electrostatic force of attraction, so electrons are pulled closer to the nucleus.
What is the trend in SUCCESSIVE IONISATION ENERGY across period 3 [4]?
Increases (Al & S are exceptions).
N.o. protons increases, shielding stays the same, so there is an increase in nuclear charge.
Decrease in atomic radius.
Theres a stronger force of attraction between the nucleus and outer electron, so more energy is required to remove the electron.
Why are Al [2] and S [2] exceptions in SUCCESSIVE IONISATION ENERGY trend?
Al's outer electron is lost from its p orbital, while Mg's electron is lost from its s orbital.
The p orbital is higher in energy, so it is further from the nucleus and more shielded.
The electrons in S's p orbital begin to pair up, while the electrons in P's orbital are not paired up.
The electron electron repulsion in S's orbital makes the removal of the electron easier.
What is the trend in MELTING POINTS across period 3 [5]?
Increases from Na-Si, then decreases from Si-Ar.
Na, Mg, Al are metals, have metallic bonding, delocalised electrons increase & cation charge increases so theres a stronger electrostatic force of attraction.
Si has a giant covalent lattice structure, loads of covalent bonds, many bonds need to be broken so a high temp is needed.
P, S, Cl are simple molecular, have weak van der waals forces, so less energy is needed.
Ar is monatomic, has weaker van der waals forces, so less energy is needed.