PYB202 Social Psychology

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/87

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:14 AM on 6/17/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

88 Terms

1
New cards

Social Psychology Definition (Aronson)

The scientific study of how people's thoughts feelings and behaviors are influenced by the real or imagined presence of others.

2
New cards

The common element in definitions of Social Psychology

The scientific study of individuals in a social context or situation.

3
New cards

The "Causal Word" in Social Psychology

Influence—because researchers are interested in the causal impact situations have on people.

4
New cards

Internal Validity

The degree to which you can be certain the Independent Variable (IV) caused the changes in the Dependent Variable (DV).

5
New cards

Random Assignment

Allocating participants to conditions so each has an equal chance of being in any group; essential for balancing individual differences.

6
New cards

Convenience Sampling

Recruiting participants based on ease of access (e.g. Sona pool); common in social psych but limited in external validity.

7
New cards

Reliability vs. Validity

Reliability is the consistency of a measure; Validity is whether the measure actually taps into the intended construct.

8
New cards

The Four Pillars of the National Statement (Ethics)

Research Merit; Justice; Beneficence (weighing risk vs. benefit); and Respect.

9
New cards

Automatic vs. Controlled Processing

Automatic is non-conscious, unintentional, and effortless (e.g. the Stroop task); Controlled is conscious, intentional, and effortful.

10
New cards

Schemas

Mental structures that organize knowledge about the world (self, others, events) and help interpret ambiguous information

11
New cards

Availability Heuristic

A mental shortcut where people judge likelihood based on how easily examples come to mind (e.g. fearing shark attacks due to news coverage).

12
New cards

Representativeness Heuristic

Judging the probability of something based on how well it matches a prototype or stereotype while often ignoring base rates.

13
New cards

Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

When a perceiver’s expectation influencers their behaviour toward a target, which causes the target to act in a way that confirms the original expectation (e.g. Rosenthla’s “bloomer” study).

14
New cards

Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE)

The tendency to overestimate internal/dispositional factors and underestimate situational factors when explaining others' behavior.

15
New cards

Kelly’s Covariation Model

A theory that attributions are made using three types of information: Consensus (others' behavior), Distinctiveness (actor's behavior with other stimuli), and Consistency (behavior over time)

16
New cards

Independent vs. Interdependent Self

Independent (Western) sees the self as a separate entity; Interdependent (Eastern) defines the self through relationships.

17
New cards

Self-Perception Theory

When internal cues are weak, people infer their attitudes by observing their own behavior and the situation in which it occurred.

18
New cards

Overjustification Effect

When external rewards (e.g. certificates) are given for a task people already enjoy, it can undermine their intrinsic motivation.

19
New cards

Self-Awareness Theory

Self-focused attention triggers a comparison of behavior against internal standards; can lead to discomfort and "escaping" the self via TV or alcohol.

20
New cards

Social Comparison (Upward/Downward)

Upward (comparing to someone better) can be inspiring or lower self-esteem; Downward (comparing to someone worse) usually boosts self-esteem.

21
New cards

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-esteem is threatened when a close other outperforms us in a domain relevant to our self-concept.

22
New cards

Self-Handicapping

Creating obstacles or excuses for oneself so that if one fails, there is a ready situational attribution (e.g. staying up late before an exam).

23
New cards

Narcissism Definition

A grandiose view of the self involving entitlement and low empathy, often leading to aggression when receiving negative feedback.

24
New cards

Propinquity (Proximity) Effect

The finding that the more we see and interact with people, the more likely they are to become our friends.

25
New cards

Mere Exposure Effect

The finding that repeated exposure to a stimulus (even non-consciously) increases our liking of it.

26
New cards

Similarity-Matching

People are drawn to those who share similar demographics, interests, and especially political views.

27
New cards

Reciprocal Liking

We like people who we think like us; this can even overpower the effects of dissimilarity.

28
New cards

Halo Effect

A bias where we assume that a person with one positive trait (like physical attractiveness) also possesses other positive traits (like kindness or intelligence).

29
New cards

Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love

Three components: Intimacy (emotional), Passion (motivational), and Commitment (cognitive).

30
New cards

Investment Model (Rusbolt)

Commitment to a relationship depends on satisfaction, the quality of alternatives, and the size of investments (time, effort, shared memories.

31
New cards

Exchange vs. Communal Relationships

Exchange involves strict reciprocity (strangers); Communal involves responding to the other's needs over time without "keeping score" (family, close friends).

32
New cards

Hostile vs. Instrumental Aggression

Hostile is driven by anger and the goal is to inflict pain; Instrumental is a means to some other end (e.g. self-defense).

33
New cards

Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis

The idea that frustration (interrupted goal progress) increases the motive to aggress, especially if the obstacle is unexpected or you are close to the goal.

34
New cards

The Weapons Effect

The mere presence of an aggressive cue (like a gun) can increase aggression in someone who is already angry.

35
New cards

Social Learning Theory (Bandura)

Aggression is learned by observing and imitating models (e.g. the Bobo Doll study).

36
New cards

Culture of Honor

A culture where small insults are seen as threats to status, triggering an aggressive response (e.g. Southern vs. Norther US males).

37
New cards

Alcohol Myopia

Alcohol narrows attention to the most salient cues (e.g. an insult) while ignoring inhibiting cues (e.g. consequences).

38
New cards

The Myth of Catharsis

Contrary to popular belief, "venting" or watching aggression actually increases subsequent aggressive behaviour.

39
New cards

Effective Aggression Interventions

Training in empathy, self-control, and cognitive reappraisal are more effective than venting or physical punishment.

40
New cards

ABC Model of Attitudes

Affective (feelings), Behavioural (observations of actions), and Cognitive (beliefs/facts) components.

41
New cards

Implicit Association Test (IAT)

An indirect measure of attitudes that uses reaction times to pair concepts, bypassing social desirability bias.

42
New cards

Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)

Predicts intentional behaviour based on Attitudes, Subjective Norms (others' approval), and Perceived Behavioural Control.

43
New cards

Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)

Persuasion occurs via the Central Route (strong arguments, high motivation) or Peripheral Route (superficial cues, low motivation).

44
New cards

The Sleeper Effect

A delayed increase in the persuasive impact of a message from a non-credible source because the source is forgotten but the message is remembered.

45
New cards

Fear Appeals Requirements

To be effective, fear must be moderate and accompanied by specific instructions on how to reduce the threat (Self-Efficacy).

46
New cards

Cognitive Dissonance Theory

Discomfort felt when behaviour is inconsistent with attitudes; reduced by changing behaviour, changing cognitions or adding new cognitions.

47
New cards

Attitude Inoculation

Making people immune to persuasion by exposing them to small, weak doses of counter-arguments first.

48
New cards

Milgram’s Obedience Study

65% of participants delivered the maximum 450-volt shock when commanded by a legitimate authority figure.

49
New cards

Factors Decreasing Obedience (Milgram)

Proximity to the victim; remote experimenter; and the presence of dissenting peers.

50
New cards

Informational Social Influence

Conforming because we see others as a source of information in ambiguous situations (e.g. Sherif’s autokinetic study); leads to private acceptance.

51
New cards

Normative Social Influence

Conforming to be liked or accepted by the group (e.g. Asch’s line study); usually leads to public compliance without private acceptance.

52
New cards

Group Size and Conformity

Conformity increases with group size up to about 5 people, after which additional people have little impact.

53
New cards

Minority Influence

A minority can influence the majority if they maintain a consistent behavioral style.

54
New cards

Idiosyncrasy Credits

Tolerance earned over time by conforming to group norms, which eventually allows a person to deviate or lead a minority view.

55
New cards

Foot-in-the-Door Technique

Getting someone to agree to a large request by first having them agree to a smaller, related request.

56
New cards

Social Facilitation

The tendency to perform better on simple tasks and worse on complex tasks in the presence of others when being evaluated.

57
New cards

Social Loafing

Putting in less effort when in a group where individual performance cannot be evaluated (motivation loss).

58
New cards

De-individuation

The loss of self-awareness and personal accountability in a crowd, often leading to impulsive or antisocial behaviour.

59
New cards

Groupthink

Flawed decision-making in highly cohesive groups where maintaining solidarity is more important than evaluating facts realistically.

60
New cards

Group Polarization

The tendency for group members to make decisions that are more extreme than their initial individual inclinations.

61
New cards

Tragedy of the Commons

A social dilemma where individuals acting in their short-term interest deplete a shared resource, leading to long-term disaster for everyone.

62
New cards

Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment

Demonstrated that social roles (guards vs. prisoners) can be so powerful they erase personal identity and drive extreme behavior.

63
New cards

Prejudice (ABC Model)

Affective (emotions/hatred), Behavioural (discrimination), and Cognitive (stereotypes).

64
New cards

Stereotype Definition

Generalizations about a group where traits are assigned to all members regardless of variation.

65
New cards

Microaggressions

Subtle, everyday, typically "automatic" forms of discrimination that are often hard to pinpoint.

66
New cards

Realistic Conflict Theory

Prejudice and discrimination arise from actual competition between groups for scarce resources (e.g. Robbers Cave study).

67
New cards

Social Identity Theory (Prejudice)

We gain self-esteem from our group memberships, leading to in-group bias and out-group derogation.

68
New cards

Out-group Homogeneity

The perception that "they" (the out-group) are all the same, while "we" (the in-group) are diverse.

69
New cards

The Contact Hypothesis (Allport)

Intergroup contact reduces prejudice only under conditions of:

  • Prolonged cooperative activity

  • Official sanctioning (supported by laws)

  • Shared similarities are emphasised

  • Equal social status

  • Out-group members are seen as typical of their group

70
New cards

Altruism vs. Prosocial Behavior

Prosocial behavior is any act helping another; Altruism is helping with no benefit (and often cost) to the self.

71
New cards

The Bystander Effect

The more people who witness an emergency, the less likely any one person is to help.

72
New cards

Pluralistic Ignorance

Bystanders look to each other for cues; if others are calm, they assume there is no emergency (social influence).

73
New cards

Diffusion of Responsibility

Each bystander's sense of duty decreases as the number of witnesses increases.

74
New cards

Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis

If we feel empathy for someone, we help for purely altruistic reasons; if not, we help only if it serves our interest.

75
New cards

Urban Overload Hypothesis

People in cities keep to themselves to avoid being overwhelmed by constant environmental stimulation.

76
New cards

Mood and Helping

People are more likely to help when they are in a good mood ("Feel Good, Do Good”) or feeling guilty.

77
New cards

How to Get Help

To reduce the bystander effect, single out one person, make eye contact and give a specific command (e.g. “You in the red shirt, call 000”).

78
New cards

Environmental Psychology Definition

A multidisciplinary field investigating the effects of the physical environment on human behavior and welfare.

79
New cards

Field Theory (Kurt Lewin)

Behavior is a function of the Person and the Environment (B=f(P,E).

80
New cards

Hawthorne Effect

Increased productivity or behavior change that occurs simply because people know they are being studied.

81
New cards

Proxemics Zones

Intimate, personal, social, and public spaces; invisible bubbles that regulate interaction.

82
New cards

Types of Territory

Primary (exclusively mine, e.g. bedroom), Secondary (regularly used, e.g. "my" lecture seat), and Public (temporary use).

83
New cards

Place Attachment

Feelings of connection to a geographic location that provide comfort and identity (e.g. Indigenous "Connection to Country").

84
New cards

Descriptive vs. Injunctive Norms

Descriptive is what people actually do (e.g. "75% reuse towels"); Injunctive is what is approved/disapproved of.

85
New cards

Induced Hypocrisy Paradigm

Highlighting the gap between a person's attitudes and their actual (often non-sustainable) behavior to motivate change.

86
New cards

Perceptual salience

we attribute causes to whatever stands out to us visually (E.g. Taylor and Fiske Actor A and B experiment)

87
New cards

Sherif’s Robbers Cave study

  • Split boys at a summer camp into waring groups. Friction was created through competitive games with a single trophy prize

  • To reduce this prejudice, Sherif introduced superordinate goals—tasks that required interdependence to succeed, such as pulling a bogged food truck or pooling money for a movie. These shared goals transformed led to reduced tension and greater interpersonal liking between members of rival groups

88
New cards

Identity threat strategies

If a group's identity is threatened (e.g., they perform poorly), members may use social creativity to redefine the value of an existing dimension (e.g., "we may have lower grades, but we have a better social life") or compare themselves to a different out-group that performed even worse