1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What is the basic structure of the U.S. Court system (federal v. state and what are the roles of each?)
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. District Courts
One in each 50 states and DC
Primary duty is to be trial courts of general jurisdiction
Circuit Courts/ U.S. Court of Appeals
13
Losing party in District court trials may appeal decision to circuit court of that region
No juries; hear appeals from federal administrative agencies (FTC/FCC)
California is ninth circuit
What is the difference between trial and appellate courts?
Trial courts: decide issues of fact (guilt or innocence of someone accused of a crime)
Appellate courts: make “precedent-setting decisions that interpret the meaning of law”
How many justices are on the Supreme Court and what are their names? Who is the chief justice and what is his role?
Chief Justice: John Roberts
Brett Kavanaugh
Samuel Alito
Clarence Thomas
Neil Gorsuch
Amy Coney Barrett
Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Ketanji Brown Jackson
Is a law that contradicts the U.S. Constitution still a valid law? Why or why not?
No; Constitution is the supreme law of the land
What are some key roles of the U.S. court system? For state law, do state supreme courts have the final say?
Interpret laws and maintain rule of law
Settle disputes
Determine guilt or innocence
Safeguard people’s liberties
Determine if laws violate the Constitution
YES, state supreme courts have final say on interpretation of their own states laws\
decisions can be appealed to supreme court if case involves federal law or constitution
Do courts have the power to establish legal precedent? Do they always follow precedent?
Yes, but not all court decisions establish legal precedent
List and briefly explain the different types of law
U.S. Constitution - The Supreme law of the land
Common Law - The oldest form of law developed out of English court decisions. Follows legal precedent
Statutory law - Encompasses acts of Congress, laws enacted by state legislators, and even ordinances adopted by city and county governments
Administrative law - Regulating agencies, judicial review, checks and balances that limit authority for government agencies like the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) and FTC (Federal Trade Commission)
Equity law - An alternative to the law; remedy for legal wrongs
Criminal law - Criminal offense against society as a whole
Civil law - Dispute between two individuals, corporations or government agencies
What are the different standards of proof for criminal v. civil law?
Criminal case: Must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt bc defendant could have life or liberty at stake
Civil case: Lower burden'; preponderance of evidence (greater than 50% probability); evidence by one side is more likely true than not
What are the basic steps in a lawsuit?
Initiating the lawsuit, file the papers
Serve the papers
Pretrial motions (demurrer or motion to dismiss OR summary judgement, no factual basis for the suit)
Discovery (each side finds strengths and weaknesses of the other side’s case)
Trial — If it goes to trial, not all cases do
Appeal
What are torts? What is an example of a tort?
Any civil wrong that creates a right for the victim to sue the perpetrator. Almost any time one party injures another, the resulting lawsuit is a tort action.
Ex. negligence, medical malpractice, products liability, libel
Is the First Amendment absolute? Why or why not, and in which landmark case did Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., say “free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.”
The Supreme Court said the First Amendment is not absolute in Schenck v. U.S.\
“Congress may abridge freedom of speech whenever that speech presents a “clear and present danger” to some other national interest that is more important than freedom of speech at the moment.””
Does not protect true threats and intimidation, incitement (imminent lawless action), fighting words, defamation, obscenity, harassment (must be targeted, discriminatory, and part of a pattern of behavior), or lawful conduct (like vandalizing property)
What’s the difference between ethics and law?
The law is a system of rules enforced by the state, which can result in punishment.
Ethics are standards of behavior or moral principles guiding conduct
Which landmark Supreme Court case “made it clear that prior restraints are generally improper in America?”
Near v. Minnesota (1931) – A newspaper may not be
censored before publication except under very
exceptional circumstances.
In which case did the government seek for the first time to censor major newspapers to prevent them from publishing secret documents that would allegedly endanger the national security? What did the U.S. Supreme Court decide in this particular case?
New York Times v. U.S./Pentagon Papers
The Supreme Court voted 6-3 to set aside the prior restraint and allow publication of the articles. Many journalists declared it a victory for the press, but was it a true victory?
Who were the key players in The Post?
Katherine Graham (publisher
Ben Bradlee (executive director)
Badigkian (Top reporter on the story)
Which landmark Supreme Court case protects First Amendment rights to free speech, unless it’s likely to produce imminent lawless action?
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
Imminent lawless action— the current incarnation of the clear and present danger test; speech can be suppressed if it causes or results in immediate violence or other lawlessness.
Chapter 2 mentions a famous seditious libel
case that “became a cause celebre on both
sides of the Atlantic. What was this case (trial
about) and who was the defense attorney in
that case?
John Peter Zenger in 1735. He
was a German immigrant who published and printed
the New York Weekly Journal. “His paper was a
leading voice of oppositions to particularly unpopular
royal governor, William Cosby. Cosby had Zenger
jailed and charged with printing and publishing a
false, scandalous and seditious libel.”
Andrew Hamilton defended Zenger. Hamilton
appealed to the jury on the basis of liberty and the
right to write and speak truth, and the jury found
Zenger not guilty.
Who were the copperheads as mentioned in chapter 2?
They were a “vigorous antiwar movement” during the Civil War that had
emerged in the North, and antiwar editors came to be known as
Copperheads. They openly advocated for Southern victory and hindered
recruiting efforts for the Union Army.