1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Definition
An unlawful indirect interference with another persons use or enjoyment of land or rights over it - Fern v Tate gallery
Claiment
Claiment must have proprietary interest - Hunter v Canary wharfe
Only a tenant or owner of property can sue
Claiment
Claiment must have proprietary interest - Hunter v Canary wharfe
Only a tenant or owner of property can sue
Type of damage
Physical - automatically a nuisence
Indirect
Indirect interference
Interference must be indirect - interference from D’s use and wnjoyment of the land
Some forms will not be protected by the courts :
Right to a view
Right to have television reception- Hunter v Canary wharfe
Right not to be viewed
Unreasonable - Locality
St Helens smelting
Sturges v bridgemen - Whether something amounts to a nusience the court must have regard to its locality
Unreasonable- Malice
Christie v Davey - The defendants actions were motivated by malice and therefore did not constitute a nusience
Unreasonable - Social benefit
Miller v Jackson - If D is providing a benefit to the community this may be a consideration but is likely to have no effect at all.
Unreasonable - Duration
The longer the lasts, the more likely it is to be a nuisance but sometimes a short interference can be a nuisance if it causes substantial harm.
Unreasonable- Sensitivity
If the C’s land/property is particularly sensitive then the interference may not be a nuisance- Robinson v Killvert
Defences - Prescription
if an interference has continued for twenty years or more without complaints D may use the Defence of prescription - Sturges v Bridgeman
Defences - planning premission
Coventry v Lawrence - Where planning premission is given for a development or change of use, the question of nusiance will thereafter fall to be decided by reference to a neighbourhood with that development or use and not as it was previously.
Defences - statutory authority
Allen v Gulf - If parliament has authorised an activity which could amount to a nusience, it will not be actionable as long as D has taken all due care and skill to avoid it
Remedies - Damages
These can be given for any harm or damage or loss of enjoyment
Remedies- injunction
Adams v lindsell the injunction that was granted was worded in such a way that the shop could be set up in a different part of the street where the C would not be affected by the nusiance