1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
S1(3)(A) OLA 1957
A premises is a fixed or moveable structure
Wheat v E Lacon
An occupier is someone who has a sufficient degree of occupational control over a premises
Lowery v Walker
Licenses (express/implied)
The calgarth
Claimant exceeds permissions becoming a trespasser
S2(2) OLA 1957
Reasonably safety
Laverton v Kapisha Takeaway
Reasonable safety is not complete safety
Chapter of Rochester v Debell
Slips trips and falls foreseeable of injury do not prevent reasonable safety
S2(3)(a) OLA 1957
Children are owed a high standard of
Glassgow v Taylor
Occupier must gaurd against allurements
Phipps v Rochester co
Occupiers can expect parents to be responsible for their children
S2(4)(a) OLA 57
Warning notices can satisfy the duty
S2(4)(b)
Workers must gaurd against ordinary risks
Non incidental risks
Owgo v Taylor
S2(5) OLA 57
Volenti
Law reform contributory negligence act 1945
Contributory negligence
Hazeldine v Daws and sons
Checked the competence of the contractor
Checked work was completed properly
Bottomley v Todmorden CC
Woodward v mayor of hastings
It was reasonable to get another person to do the work
Exclusion causes
S65 consumer rights act 2015
Roles v nathan
Same as 1(4)(a) - workers must gaurd against ordinary risks