Occupiers liability 1957

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 12:07 PM on 4/29/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

20 Terms

1
New cards

S1(3)(A) OLA 1957

A premises is a fixed or moveable structure

2
New cards

Wheat v E Lacon

An occupier is someone who has a sufficient degree of occupational control over a premises

3
New cards

Lowery v Walker

Licenses (express/implied)

4
New cards

The calgarth

Claimant exceeds permissions becoming a trespasser

5
New cards

S2(2) OLA 1957

Reasonably safety

6
New cards

Laverton v Kapisha Takeaway

Reasonable safety is not complete safety

7
New cards

Chapter of Rochester v Debell

Slips trips and falls foreseeable of injury do not prevent reasonable safety

8
New cards

S2(3)(a) OLA 1957

Children are owed a high standard of

9
New cards

Glassgow v Taylor

Occupier must gaurd against allurements

10
New cards

Phipps v Rochester co

Occupiers can expect parents to be responsible for their children

11
New cards

S2(4)(a) OLA 57

Warning notices can satisfy the duty

12
New cards

S2(4)(b)

Workers must gaurd against ordinary risks

13
New cards

Non incidental risks

Owgo v Taylor

14
New cards

S2(5) OLA 57

Volenti

15
New cards

Law reform contributory negligence act 1945

Contributory negligence

16
New cards

Hazeldine v Daws and sons

Checked the competence of the contractor

17
New cards

Checked work was completed properly

Bottomley v Todmorden CC

18
New cards

Woodward v mayor of hastings

It was reasonable to get another person to do the work

19
New cards

Exclusion causes

S65 consumer rights act 2015

20
New cards

Roles v nathan

Same as 1(4)(a) - workers must gaurd against ordinary risks