1/114
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Nondeclarative memory type
skill/motor/procedural
skill
ability that can improve over time thru practice
depends on complexity, encoding level, frequency, conditions of recall
expert
person who performs a skill better than most
perceptual-motor skill
learned mvmt patterns guided by sensory inputs
cognitive skill
requires problem solving/application of strategies
features of skill memories
Difficult to convey except by demonstration
May be acquired w/o awareness
Require many repetitions
(vs declarative mem that can be conveyed flexibly, consciously accessible, single exposure)
Cognitive vs Perceptual-motor Skills
Cognitive depends on intellectual process
Perceptual-motor depends on physical dexterity/speed/strength
Perceptual-motor learned first THEN cognitive skills in bbs
nonhumans show cog skills via tool use (not all species can)
closed skill
predefined mvmts that never vary
open skills
mvmts based on predictions about changing demands of enviro
knowledge of results
feedback about performance—prediction error/learning signal
critical to effective practice
power law of practice
improved performance from practice decreases after a certain point, as practice inc
-learning occurs quickly at first then slows down
BUT, new sources of feedback can lead to a new burst of rapid mvmt
massed practice
concentrated, continuous
spaced practice
spread out over several sessions
improves perf better than massed
even if fewer total hrs than massed, it takes longer
constant practice
constrained set of skills
variable practice
wide variety of contexts (i.e. gradually inc difficulty/changing task condition)
implicit learning
happens w/o awareness of whats been learned
antero amnesia implicit skill learning
serial reaction time task
press a certain key when visual cue comes—perceptual motor skills
RT faster for fixed seq vs random
implicitly learned to anticipate the keys w/o awareness of a fixed seq
motor programs / habits
perceptual-motor skills with minimal attention
3 stages of skill learning
Cognitive stage: actively think to encode/perform a skill
Using written instructions or verbalized rules
Associative stage: stereotyped actions & rely less on actively recalled memories of rules
Setting up tent in a fixed seq w/o instructions
Autonomous stage: skill become motor programs
Mvmts seem automatic—setting up tent while talking ab art
talent
master a skill with little effort, “gift” for that skill
rotary pursuit task for percep-motor skill learning
Twin study showed that w/ prac, genetic predispositions for a skill can take over
identical twins = correls btwn them inc with training
fraternal = correls dec with training (less similar w/ prac)
shows that practice decreases effects of previous experience (nurture) & inc effects of genetic influences (nature)
transfer specificity
restricted applicability of learned skills to specific situations
Identical elements theory
transfer of learned abilities to novel situations depends on # of identical elements in new situation (playing on hard vs clay; playing tennis vs badminton)
Learning set formation
acquiring ability to learn novel tasks rapidly based on frequent experiences with similar tasks (opening doors)
skill decay
loss of a skill thru non-use (related to passive forgetting)
skill-memory systems
basal ganglia, cerebral cortex, cerebellum
modulates control of mvmt
assocs btwn sensory perceptions & motor mvmts formed thru repetition
info from all sensory modals & motor reaches striatum (BG)
BG & skill learning
gets lots of cortical input (first thru striatum), damage disrupts skill learning
imp for cog and percep-motor learning
control velocity, direction, amp of mvmt, prep to move
learning deficits after BG/hipp lesions
-learn to avoid revisiting arms: Hipp damage impairs this
-learn to enter arms w light (learned percep-motor assoc): BG damage impairs this
Deliberative decision-making system
Evaluations made "online" taking goal & motivation into account
Flexible, but computationally expensive & slow
deliberation
Determine potential possibilities (form cog map)
evaluate likely outcomes
select action
T maze deliberating: can self-correct at early pts but start over (punish) if wrong choice at last
Early trials = deliberation, later trials = habitual
Vicarious trial & err - VTE
pause at decision points & look back n forth at options (looks like deliberation)
when behaviorally looking back n forth, hipp place cells imagine going L/R
occurs at final choice pt
dec as beh becomes habit
mental time travel
imagines another time/place from one's past (episodic mem) or in future (episodic future thinking)
Stage 2 of deliberation (requires knowledge of past)
episodic future thinking
Imagining possible future events activates similar representational systems to remembering past events
Hipp damage impairs both episodic mem&future thinking
Neural activity during perceptual-motor skill task
Task: high or low freq. tone to indicate reward on L/R arm
in early training, neurons fire strongly when chose which way to turn
In late training, neurons shift to coding the beg and end of ea trial (autonomous stage)
This shows: BG neurons changes with learning percep-motor skill
cortical rep of skills
Practicing a percep-motor task can cause reps within motor cortex to expand—Plasticity/reorg
experience affects circuits!
cerebellum & skills
involved in encoding, retrieving, & forming skill mems
lesions disrupt mirror tracing BUT rates of learning same
WM
active & temp rep of info that is maintained for the short-term, available for manipulation
Rehearsal is imp to keep info active/accessible
cog/exec control
manipulation & application of WM for planning, task-switch, attention, stimulus selection, inhibit reflexive responses
LTM
permanent storage of memory that lasts beyond conscious attention
-accessed slowly, unlimited capacity, forgotten slower
STM
temporary memory maintained thru active rehearsal
active contents of consciousness, rapidly accessed, limited in capacity, forgotten quick
Broad class of transient mems
Atkinson-Shiffrin model = sensory & STM
transient memory
nonpermanent memory that lasts secs to mins; short-lasting
Sensory mems are brief transient sensations of what you perceived when you seen/heard/etc
Baddeley’s WM model
visuospatial sketchpad (object/location info) & phonological loop (aud/verbal info) controlled by central exec (add items from LTM, transfer info)
Assess CE by asking ppl to keep track of previous responses
Phonological loop
w/o rehearsal, ppl retain 2 sec worth of info in loop
Internal unspoken speech during rehearsal is vital
Word-length effect: tendency for a person to remember fewer words from a list as the length of words increases
Visuospatial sketchpad
Similar to loop, limited capacity but capacities are separate
Dual-task experiments provide evidence for the independence of the two buffers
Delayed nonmatch-to-sample is a test of visual memory
cog control tasks
Update STM: N-back task, self-ordered search
Goal setting/planning: Tower of Hanoi (keep track of subgoals)
Task switching: WCST
Stimulus attention/response inhibition: Stroop task
Behavior changes after frontal damage
loss of ability to plan & organize (Dysexecutive syndrome)
Deficits in ALL WM/cog control tasks
can learn initial rule but later, they show perseveration—fail to learn a new rule & persist on old rule
Tumors, surgery, strokes, blunt-force trauma
3 divisions of PFC
orbital
medial
lateral - DLPFC (top left & right sides) and VLPFC (lower left & right sides)
DLPFC for higher-order exec control (monitor/manipulate stored info)—central exec
VLPFC supports encoding/retrieval of info (rehearsal/maintenance)--visuospatial sketchpad/phonological rehearsal loop
Orbitofrontal cortex & predicting outcomes
Ventral surface of PFC, high-level association cortex
Involved in learning to predict outcomes of beh (R-->O)
input = sensory & output = goes to striatum
Eye-gaze task: frontal activity during WM task
inc firing during delay, showing holding info of cue location in WM until info is needed (persistent activity in DLPFC)
Sequential activity in delayed alteration task
activity passed from one neuron to another—chain of neurons trying to maintain same info one at a time
Specificity in the timing and L/R info, both on correct & err trials
anatomical mapping of cog control & WM
VLPFC supports encoding/retrieval
DLPFC supports higher order functions
Visuospatial (abstract items in self-order task) in right DLPFC activity
Phonological (verbal items in task) mostly in left DLPFC activity but strong in L&R
place models of memory
"multi-store" — 2+ places for memories to be stored
Cowan model where LTM info can be activated as STM focus of attention
state-based models
1 place for memory that can be in various states
WM emerges from a network of regions, all of which send/receive info to/from PFC
frontal-posterior circuits
Frontal activity projects back to posterior, which projects forward to frontal
Exec process in frontal & representations of items in posterior areas where they are stored
Frontal activity induces sustained activation of posterior regions
flow of control within frontal goes from anterior regions (for high levels of abstract goals) toward back of frontal (specific subgoals)
emotion
program of actions triggered by stimuli
Distinct emotions hardwired in humans (happy, sad, anger, fear, disgust, surprise)
Not all humans interpret emotions the same BUT physiological responses/conscious feelings associated w/ emotions are innate/universal
3 phenomena in emotion
-Physiological/autonomic responses
-Overt Beh (muscle mvmt)
-Conscious feel
Physiological/autonomic responses
Facilitate beh & mobilization of energy
ANS signals adrenal glands to release stress hormones (epinephrine & GCs/stress hormones like cortisol)
GCs bind to receptors all over body/brain
HPA Axis steps
Step 1: you feel stress & hypothalamus release CRH (from PVN)
Step 2: CRH causes pituitary to release ACTH
Step 3: ACTH causes adrenal glands to release GCs
Step 4: hypothalamus responds to GCs to reduce CRH if GCs are high (negative feedback system)
HPA axis influence on body
impacts memory
GCs can have long-lasting effects on regulating regions
More GCs can dec LTP & inc errors in task
Stress-induced hippocampal damage
conscious feeling
-Subjective experience / perceptions
-Occurs when the mind senses the physiological responses associated with fear/arousal
Two-factor theory of attention
combo of cog appraisal AND perception of biological changes determine conscious feelings of emotion
Cog awareness helps interpret bodily responses consistent with the current context
Somatic theories of emotion
bodily responses to stimuli first, then conscious feeling (Lange theory)
^not true....they occur simultaneously & independently
Bodily responses = hypothalamic structures, & emotion feelings = thalamus
fear response
physiological change, overt beh, & conscious reactions from fear
piloerection
fear response where body hair stands on end, making animal look bigger & more threatening
conditioned emotional response
a CR produced in response to a CS, that is paired with an emotional US
Overt behavior (freezing—innate) or high BP (autonomic response)
Conditioned escape
learn to make response in order to escape aversive stimuli
Escape learning = operant conditioning
S^D (shock) --> R (lever press) --> O (escape)
Negative reinforcement
learned helplessness
uncontrollable punisher teaches responses are ineffectual —> motivation to escape reduced
mood congruency of memory
easiest to retrieve mems that match emotional state
brain areas imp for emotion
Hippocampus (episodic mem formation)
Thalamus (sensory info relay)
Hypothalamus (regulate body response)
amygdala
-at anterior tip of hippocampi
-critical for learning/expressing emotions and mediate emotional modulation of memory formation
-activity triggers physiological arousal AND behavioral responses
Lateral nucleus > Basolateral nucleus > Central nucleus
Lesions to central nucleus disrupt learning/showing new emotional responses
amygdala + fear
Important for fear
Visual info reaches amygdala
Unilateral amygdala lesion (left)-->interhemispheric connections severed-->visual info to left eye >no fear response
But if using right eye, normal fear response
amygdala bilateral damage
deficits in learning emotional responses
fail to learn CCed emotional responses
Patient SM—recognized all expressions EXCEPT fear
2 pathways into amygdala
fast-and-rough VS slow-but-accurate
Direct pathway from thalamus to amygdala is faster BUT less detail
Indirect pathway from thalamus>cortex>amygdala is slower BUT more detailed
basolateral amygdala & CC/danger learning
neutral CS paired with a fear-evoking US
US: shock; CS: almond odor; Neutral: anise odor
Before CS-US pairing, neither odor elicited BLA response
After pairing almond + shock, BLA neurons strongly responded to almond but not neutral odor
where in brain context is learned
contextual info from hipp helps amygdala trigger emo responses
returning to context where an emo experience occurred is enough to evoke emo response
conditioned contextual learning
tone-shock assoc & show freezing to tone
assoc btwn context (chamber) & shock, and show freezing to just being placed back in chamber
Hippocampus necessary to learn context-shock assoc
amygdala & memory encoding
More amygdala activation during encoding assoc with better memory later ONLY FOR EMOTIONAL CONTENT
Activation unrelated for neutral vids
stress hormones & memory encoding
ANS signals adrenal glands to release stress hormones (GC's/epin)
blocking Norepinephrine (NT that can cross BBB, unlike epin) reduces memory for emotional material
Light-dark box study—shocked in dark side then given epinephrine
time-dependent enhancement of emotional memory
shorter delay before drug given = longer hesitation before reentering dark side
stress & hippocampus
-stress induced damage (decreased size & loss of neurons)
preg monkey given synthetic GCs & fetus have ^
social learning
actively monitor events then choose later actions based on those observations
Diff from CC/OC since we cannot reliably predict what an organism will learn from observing
copying
prereqs for copying: social modeling (Bobo doll experiment) & perspective taking (imagine yourself in place of another)
2 types of copying: true imitation & emulation
true imitation
reproducing motor acts
Two-action test—compare imitations
True imitation does not always entail perspective taking
emulation
replicating an outcome w/o replicating specific motor acts (novel actions that lead to same outcome of modeler)
Bandura’s 4 processes for copying
Presence of model
Memories for observed situation stored in accessible format so they can guide later actions
Ability to reproduce action
Motivation for reproducing action
social learning theory
the reinforcements observed in past social contexts creates a memory & determines future actions
Bandura says we gain info about rewards/punish by observing modeler’s outcomes
emotional contagion
emotionally react to visual/acoustic stimuli that show emotional responses
(typically by replicating the observed response—NOT b/c of imitation but b/c of unconditioned response)
observational conditioning
learn emo response after observing similar responses in others
hard to distinguish from imitative learning
Blackbirds' UR to an owl (US) = attack
Bottle becomes CS that elicits CR (attack)
stimulus enhancement
observations of others draws attention toward specific things within an enviro
Powerfully affects learning—focus is drawn to a subset of features within an enviro that might provide useful info
Increases likelihood of exposure to that stimuli + outcome
vocal imitation
Best in humans & birds, other animals show little ability
Animals training to produce sounds = conditioning, not vocal imitation
Vocal learning = adjusting sound production based on previous
song learning in birds
Abnormal singing in isolated birds
Template model of song learning: song memorization, song practices, song utilization
Birds learn proper social contexts to sing songs
social transmission of info
communicate info that may affect future actions of group members
Seen in ALL human cultures
social conformity
adopt behavior of the group
Protective & rapid acquisition BUT may hinder development of novel beh
Guppies chose same escape route as modeler, even if other option closer
stimulus enhancement
direct-matching hypothesis
mems for actions are stored in specialized cortical regions that map observed actions onto motor representations of the actions
mirror neurons
fire the same way during observations of an action and while performing the action
Mechanism for true imitation
emotional mirror neurons
Observer sees other get shocked & neurons in observer's ACC respond strongly
Observer rat then caused pain via laser & Same neurons in ACC respond
shows emotional mirror neurons responding to pain, not fear
mirror neurons in songbirds
High vocal center (HVC) controls timing
Robust nucleus of archistriatum (RA) controls detail
LMAN is frontal cortex-like in mammals & Area X = basal ganglia
sequential replay of future trajectories
Observer watch demonstrator make correct turn
Observer hippocampal neurons become active sequentially along the correct trajectory
developing memory
By 6 weeks, process/respond to sensory stimuli
By 25 weeks, brain & sense organs develop to start learning sounds
Habituation & recognition possible before birth
episodic memory matures slower than semantic
conditioning & skill learning
Explosion of learning in 1st few yrs of life
Complex motor skills come gradually, as physical development helps muscle strength & perceptual-motor coordination
During age 1-2, language basics
During age 4-5, complex grammar/reading
elicited imitation
technique for assessing mems in preverbal infants
Shown an action & tested for ability to mimic later
begin to imitate sounds during first few months