Contrast two approaches for explaining prosocial behaviour ERQ

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/25

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:11 PM on 4/21/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

26 Terms

1
New cards

INTRODUCTION - Approaches to Prosocial Behaviour

Prosocial behaviour is any action intended to benefit others. Explanations for prosocial behaviour can be biological, focusing on innate and evolutionary mechanisms, or psychological, focusing on cognitive and emotional processes.

2
New cards

Definition - Prosocial Behaviour

Prosocial behaviour refers to actions intended to help or benefit another person or society, including sharing, donating, cooperating, and assisting others.

3
New cards

Definition - Altruism

Altruism is a selfless form of prosocial behaviour in which the helper provides aid at a cost or risk to themselves, with no expectation of personal gain.

4
New cards

Definition - Kin Selection Theory

Kin selection theory (biological approach) suggests that people are more likely to help close genetic relatives to ensure the survival of shared genes, enhancing evolutionary fitness.

5
New cards

Simmons et al. (1977) - Aim

To test kin selection theory by investigating whether close relatives of kidney patients would be willing to donate a kidney.

6
New cards

Simmons et al. (1977) - Participants

Opportunity sample of potential kidney donors who were relatives of patients at University of Minnesota hospitals.

7
New cards

Simmons et al. (1977) - Procedure

Participants completed questionnaires asking if they would donate a kidney to a close relative. Patients rated their emotional closeness to each potential donor before the choice was made.

8
New cards

Simmons et al. (1977) - Results

Parents agreed to donate 86% of the time; siblings 47%. Donors reported feeling closer than non-donors (63% vs 42%).

9
New cards

Simmons et al. (1977) - Conclusion

Kin selection theory explains some prosocial behaviour: people are more likely to help close relatives to preserve shared genetic material.

10
New cards

Simmons et al. (1977) - Strengths

High ecological validity because actual kidney patients were used. Supports evolutionary reasoning for altruism.

11
New cards

Simmons et al. (1977) - Limitations

14% of parents refused to donate, suggesting other factors influence helping. Age, sex, health, and personal preferences also affect willingness, reducing the explanatory power of the theory.

12
New cards

Definition - Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis (EAH)

The EAH (psychological approach) proposes that empathy motivates prosocial behaviour. Helping may be altruistic or influenced by self-oriented motives such as relieving personal distress or gaining social approval.

13
New cards

Toi & Batson (1982) - Aim

To investigate how empathy and ease of escape influence prosocial behaviour.

14
New cards

Toi & Batson (1982) - Participants

84 female psychology students.

15
New cards

Toi & Batson (1982) - Procedure

Participants listened to an interview of "Carol," a student who broke her legs. Empathy was manipulated (focus on Carol's feelings vs. factual info). Ease of escape was manipulated (Carol returning next week vs. staying home). DV: willingness to help by sharing class notes.

16
New cards

Toi & Batson (1982) - Results

Participants in the high-empathy condition were more likely to help. Low-escape participants were slightly more likely to help, but empathy was the stronger predictor.

17
New cards

Toi & Batson (1982) - Conclusion

Empathy motivates prosocial behaviour. Emotional concern can increase helping independent of personal gain.

18
New cards

Toi & Batson (1982) - Strengths

Controlled lab study with clear manipulation of empathy and escape, increasing internal validity. Provides evidence for psychological mechanisms behind altruism.

19
New cards

Toi & Batson (1982) - Limitations

Small, all-female student sample reduces generalisability. Lab setting may reduce ecological validity. Motivation may still involve some self-interest, complicating interpretation as "pure altruism."

20
New cards

Holistic Discussion - Biological vs. Psychological Explanations

Biological approaches explain prosocial behaviour as innate and adaptive. Kin selection theory shows that genetic relatedness predicts helping, suggesting an evolutionary mechanism. Psychological approaches emphasise cognition and emotion, such as empathy, which motivates helping regardless of genetic relatedness.

21
New cards

Holistic Discussion - Role of Motivation

Biological explanations assume prosocial behaviour is largely unconscious and reflexive, aimed at gene preservation. Psychological explanations highlight conscious processes and affective states, suggesting that motivations can be egoistic or altruistic.

22
New cards

Holistic Discussion - Methodological Considerations

Biological studies like Simmons et al. often use real-world scenarios (high ecological validity), whereas psychological studies like Toi & Batson use lab experiments (high internal validity). Each method has trade-offs for generalisation.

23
New cards

Holistic Discussion - Scope and Applicability

Kin selection theory mainly applies to helping relatives and does not fully account for helping strangers. Empathy-altruism theory can explain helping of both close others and strangers, offering a broader explanatory scope.

24
New cards

Holistic Discussion - Integrative View

Prosocial behaviour is likely influenced by both biological predispositions and psychological states. Evolutionary mechanisms may predispose humans to help close relatives, while empathy and social cognition can extend helping to non-relatives in society.

25
New cards

Holistic Discussion - Limitations and Interactions

Neither approach fully explains all prosocial behaviour alone. Individual differences, cultural norms, and situational factors interact with both biological and psychological mechanisms to influence helping behaviour.

26
New cards

Holistic Discussion - Evaluation of Evidence

Empirical evidence supports both approaches: Simmons et al. validates evolutionary predictions for kin, while Toi & Batson demonstrates empathy's role. Combining evidence provides a more comprehensive understanding of prosocial behaviour.