contact lens designs

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/20

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:16 PM on 5/25/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

21 Terms

1
New cards

what is the main anatomy of a contact lens (5)

known as parameters:

  • front optic zone diameter - FOZD

  • back optic zone diameter - BOZD

  • total diameter - TD

  • back peripheral radius 1 + 2

  • back optic zone radius - Base curve - BC

2
New cards

what parameters are commonly found on the blister pack (3)

  • base curve - curvature measured in mm

  • TD - width of lens in mm

  • power - sphere/cyl - measured in diopters

3
New cards

describe lens diameter of a soft contact lens (2)

Total contact lens diameter – greater than HVID

lens is usually much bigger by a couple mm – drapes over cornea and rests on conjunctiva 

4
New cards

describe thickness of soft contact lenses (3)

  • prescription determines thickness

  • mid periphery and peripheral curves fixed in design

  • interested in central thickness, mid periphery and overall

5
New cards

describe curvature of soft contact lenses (2)

  • front and back optical radii will determine optical value; the power difference between the 2 determines the optical value - the power of the lens

  • other radii (peripheral) on contact lens determine physical design - the fit of the lens - ensure lens is smooth on edges and don’t irritate eye or bulge into conjunctiva

6
New cards

describe design of soft contact lenses (2)

  • further design of lens radii of peripheral curves; their widths, number and junctional curves

  • junctional curves - blended curves – from OZ to mid periphery – more to do with hard contact lenses – if hold up to light may see shadow which represents junctional

7
New cards

describe the ideal relationship of soft contact lenses with the eye (2)

  • parameters of the contact lens should closely meet the dimensions of the ocular surface 

  • ideal - alignment fit - measure surface of cornea – fit a CL which aligns with this – don’t want it to be too flat or steep

8
New cards

what are the basic lens designs (3)

  • Spherical – 1 power

  • Toric - astigmatic - 2 meridians - each with own power

  • Multifocal – aspheric in design – blended powers

9
New cards

show how there is a variety of designs of multifocal lenses relating to where the power lies

10
New cards

describe what the base curve is and how we calculate it - also state the average BC value (4)

  • is the fit of the lens of the eye - base line curvature of the eye - OZ radii how it fits onto eye

  • take the readings from keratometer or topographer - k readings

  • (K1 + K2) / 2 + 0.9mm

  • Normal base curve – 8.4-9.2mm – as fitting slightly flatter than eye – dependent on k readings but not based on it

11
New cards

describe how we calculate the total diameter (2)

  • Soft lenses must cover the cornea and drape onto the conjunctiva

  • related to HVID - HVID + 2mm - as we want it to drape

12
New cards

describe how we calculate the optic zone (3)

  • Where the power is on the lens - what makes the person see - centre of the lens - determines power of the lens

  • related to pupil size

  • OZ needs to be bigger than the scotopic pupil - usually 6-7mm - or a little bigger depending on px

13
New cards

describe how we calculate the power (3)

  • Based on the refraction

  • May be spherical or toric of a MF or a toric MF

  • Vertex correction applies >4D in any meridian

14
New cards

explain the term vertex distance and how the vertex distance affects the power chosen for the contact lens (5)

  • The distance between the front surface of the cornea and the back lens surface is called vertex distance

  • Vertex distance affects how light bends, which impacts vision clarity and lens power. 

  • Because the CL rests ON the eye - the vertex distance d is is essentially 0 - so effective power of the lens is impacted

  • for example - for a power of +6 - would need to prescribe +6.50 and for -6 would need to prescribe -5.62

  • Vertex distance changes mostly affect prescriptions over ±4.00 dioptres. 

15
New cards

how do we prescribe/work out the rx if the px has a low astigmatic rx (up to 1.00DC) in addition to hyperopia/myopia (4)

  • in this case a soft spherical lens may be prescribed

  • Best Sphere = Sphere + ½ Cyl

  • Can only use this when the CYL component is less than a 1/3 of the total prescription - eg: if the rx was plano / -1.00 DC we would NOT use it - but if it was: -6.00 Ds / -1.00 Dc then we CAN use it - have to look carefully at the px prescription

  • Best Sphere is fitted in cases of 1.00DC or lower

16
New cards

what should be considered if the prescription has a cyl exceeding 0.75DC

  • toric CL is to be considered and fitted for best visual acuity.

17
New cards

how do we work out the prescription if it is ± 4.00 D and give an example

  • then the vertex distance should be calculated to determine its effective power:

  • Fcl/BVPcl =      FSP / 1-dFSP

  • FSP = lens power / d = vertex distance (in m?)

eg:

  • +6.00 spectacle power and vertex distance of 12mm

  • FCL​=1−(0.012×6.00)6.00​

  • FCL​=6.00/0.928=+6.47D

  • therefore CL power is = +6.50D

18
New cards

describe the difference between spectacles and CLs in correcting hyperopia (3)

  • focal length of spectacles is longer than the focal length of CLs

  • therefore CLs have a SHORTER distance over which to bring light to a focus than do spectacle lenses, i.e.

fC Lens < fSpec Lens

  • Therefore, the BVP/BVD of a CL must be GREATER than the equivalent CL to correct HYPEROPIA - example +6 rx needs to be +6.50 as the BVP has to be GREATER than the equivalent CL

19
New cards

describe the difference between spectacles and CLs in correcting myopia (3)

  • focal length of spectacles is SHORTER than focal length of CLs

  • therefore CLs have a LONGER distance over which to bring light to a focus than do spectacle lenses, i.e.

fC Lens > fSpec Lens

  • Therefore, the BVP of a CL must be LOWER than the equivalent CL to correct MYOPIA - example -6 rx would need to be -5.62 as the BVP needs to be LOWER than the equivalent CL

20
New cards

explain why 2 lenses with the same sagittal height do not behave the same (3)

  • It is inappropriate to use sagittal heights in isolation without reference to the back surface design (at least) since assumptions of behaviour based only on a sagittal height value can be misleading

  • Sometimes the term sagittal depth is used rather than sagittal height.  There is no difference and usage is a matter of personal preference.

  • Lenses don’t have same peripheral design – may have same sagittal height and diameter – but will move differently on the eye

21
New cards

explain the effects of sagittal height and diameter on lens fit (5)

The diameter can be left unaltered and the sag changed by altering the BOZR.

The diameter can be altered and the BOZR changed in such a manner that the sag is left unchanged.

Both the diameter and sag can be changed.

By increasing the sag height independent of diameter, the fit of the lens becomes effectively steeper and, predictably, tighter

By decreasing the sag height independent of diameter, the fit of the lens becomes effectively flatter and, predictably, looser