1/65
Final exam
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Prejudice
evaluative or affective component (A)
Most prejudice is more subtle and complex than before
Conscious and unconscious levels
discrimination
behavioral component (B) Not permitting people certain jobs or opportunities
stereotypes
cognitive component (C) belief about members of a group based upon their group membership
A group belief about a group
Stereotypes vs attitudes
Stereotype- A group belief about a group
Ex. Jew are cheap
Asians are good at math
Typical attitudes- an individual belief about a group based on experience
Descriptive
what one believes about a group
Women are weaker than men
Prescriptive
what we think they should or should not do
Women should keep to the house
Prejudice today
Open prejudice is generally frowned upon
Reduction in overt prejudice
Open racial prejudice is generally discouraged, but: There are still active hate groups nationwide, Some antagonism had grown acceptable
Why do we call it ambivalent sexism? What are the two parts
-hostile and benevolent
Social identity theory
Three processes:
We categorize
We identify and associate ourselves with an ingroup
We compare ourselves with an outgroup
Identity biases and categorization effects
Ingroup bias- we favor our own group
Outgroup Homogeneity Bias- Members of other group appear similar to us (other race effect)
Accentuation effects (Corneille, 2004)- we recall members of a group as more stereotypical than they are
Social psychological sources of prejudice
cognitive, emotional, and social processes, including social identity theory (favoring in-groups, derogating out-groups), realistic group conflict (competition for resources), and social learning through socialization
Dehumanization/infrahumanization
we see members of outgroup as less human than ourselves
Stereotype content model
We sort outgroups in terms of
Warmth
Competence
High in warmth but low in competence are the disabled, housewives and elderly
High competence low warmth are black professionals, Asians, northerners, feminists, and jews
priming
exposure to one stimulus influences how a person responds to a subsequent, related stimulus. These stimuli are often conceptually related words or images.
we associate African Americans with guns
The implicit association task
Indicates that whites tend to have a basic preference for white over black faces
Situational Ambiguity
a lack of clarity, certainty, or information in a social context, making it difficult for individuals to interpret events, predict outcomes, or determine the appropriate course of action
People exhibit discrimination when it can be blamed on another situation
Implicit prejudice
unintentional, hard to control, conditioned early on
Crutches movie study
Explicit prejudice
intentional, reflective, with awareness
effects on victims of prejudice
Self-fulfilling prophesy (Allport, 1958)
Blaming oneself: Withdrawal, self-hate, aggression against one’s own group
Blaming others: striking out, being suspicious
Self-loathing
Clark & Clark’s (1947) doll studies
Negatively performance effects
Stereotype threat (Steele, 1990s)- self-fulfilling belief that one will conform to a negative stereotype
Stereotypes of people with disabilities
Asexual
Unappealing
Dependent
Entitled
Isolated
Unemployable
Roots of prejudice
Illusory correlation- the intersections of unlikely events
Just world beliefs
Selective pressure (evolutionary) to avoid
Outsiders
Non-reciprocators
Potentially diseased or hazardous
Media effects
Frustration (scapegoat theory)
Personality
Religion
Empathy
Authoritarianism
Aggression
Physical or verbal behavior intended to hurt someone
Harm
Intentionality
In the eye of the beholder (or receiver)
A social act
Hostile Aggression
Aggression driven by anger and performed as an end in itself
Instrumental Aggression
Aggression that is a means to some other end
Hobbes
Life is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short
We develop a social contract to live cooperatively
Develop a set of rules
Freud
We are all born with nothing but id
We do the social contract in our heads
Internalize a set of rules
We are born like animals with sexual and aggressive drives
By age 5 ego and super ego have developed
So we all are still animals, but we work out acceptable, cathartic ways of releasing aggressive and sexual impulses
roots of aggression
Friends, media, upbringing
Is aggression learned?
Social learning- imitation
Albert bandura’s bobo doll study- social learning theory
What predicts aggression- peers delinquency, media violence, peer victimization, sex, neighborhood crime, abusive parenting
Aggressive cues
Heat, crowd, pain (aversive events)
Weapons effect (Berkowitz, 1970s, 1980s)
Pornography and aggression
The frustration aggression theory
Frustration-> aggression
Frustration<- aggression
Frustration- the blocking of goal directed behavior
Aggression is always a consequence of frustration
Frustration invariably leads to aggression
Displacement- directing aggression a safer, more socially acceptable target
Aggression as a learned social behavior
learned through observation, imitation, and reinforcement
Aggression as a cultural norm
Is it normal for some cultures to fight more than others
Is gunplay normal in some cultures
southerners more angry than northerners when bumped
Upbringing and aggression
. High-level, persistent aggression is often linked to factors like harsh physical punishment, inconsistent discipline, and poor parental monitoring
How does aggressive gaming link to aggressive personality
Repeated violent game playing
Aggressive beliefs and attitudes
Aggressive perceptions
Aggressive expectations
Aggressive behavior scripts
Aggressive desensitization
Increased aggressive personality
Aggression and catharsis
People came out of watching violent completions more aggressive
People who came out of high stakes competitions did not get more aggressive
Pornography and aggression
Excitation transfer theory- people are becoming excited in one way, but expressing it in another
Rape myth acceptance
Social scripts and altered perceptions
Affiliation
Social comparison- we are brought together, in part, from our need for comparison
seek company from others, form positive relationships, join social groups
We are social animals
We are shaped that way by the past (evolution)
We are healthier with others than we are alone
Misery and company
Misery, in many cases loves company
individuals facing distress or sadness often seek out others in similar situations to normalize their feelings, reduce isolation, and gain emotional validation
Affiliation in our modern world
Older 2000 theories
Computers isolate people and they do weird things (maladaptive things)
The internet can bring otherwise lonely people out of isolation
Beware of internet addiction
More refined theories
Internet can deepen preexisting relationships
Or replace offline interaction with superficial online interaction
Or provide interaction for those who lack
Depends upon the use
Physical and Genetic explanations of attraction
Traits that suggest fertility/health (the environmental security hypothesis)
Traits that Suggest Fertility/health
Symmetry and averageness: Symmetry of features as a predictor of attraction
Inherited mechanism for avoiding incest
Did I see my mom repeatedly care for this person as a newborn
Kin- intense sexual aversion
Have I co-resided with this person since my birth
Kin- duration dependent sexual aversion
If neither- fair game
Chemicals
Neuropeptide oxytocin
“the love hormone” or “liquid trust”
Strengthens maternal/protective bonds in female rats. Human results mixed
Release in humans triggered by: Breast feeding, Sexual stimulation, Empathy
In lab, nasal spray can result in increased trust and generosity
Why do people have sex
Physical
Stress reduction, pleasure, experience seeking, physical desirability
Goal attainment
Resources, status, revenge
Emotional
Love and commitment, expression
Insecurity
Self-esteem boost, duty/pressure, mate guarding
Proximity
Who did people list as their closest friends in a dorm at MIT- people who were more likely to be encountered were liked more
Familiarity
The mere exposure effect
Similarity
Couples are similar in terms of
Physical attractiveness
Demographic characteristics
Psychological characteristic
Explanations
Assortative mating (choose similar partner)
Social homogamy (choose partner from same group/social class)
Convergence (become more like partner over time)
The two factor theory
An encounter on a bridge with Dutton and Aron (1974)
Interviewer male or female, all participants male
At end of questions interviewer gives phone number
Experiment repeated on a less scary bridge
primary colors of love
Eros (passionate/romantic), Ludus (playful/game-playing), and Storge (friendship/familial). These styles are intended to be mixed, forming secondary styles like Agape (selfless), Pragma (practical), and Mania (obsessive) to explain complex romantic behaviors
Love in the age of the internet
As the internet changes, concerns regarding the internet change
The internet makes certain things more possible, Good and bad things
Different people will use the internet and social media differently
People show off accomplishments: Stoke jealousy, Invade privacy, Meet strangers
Ostracism
We are evolutionary primed to be adverse to ostracism
4 needs that ostracism threatens:
Need to belong
Need for control
Need for self esteem
Need for a meaningful existence
Rejection
We feel bad when someone values us less than we wish they would
Many forms: Romantic rejection, Social ostracism, Job termination, Stigmatization
Reactions vary: Anti-social, Pro-social, Withdrawal
Depending upon how we construe the situation: Relationship value, Perceived fairness, Can relationship be repaired, Are there alternatives
Altruism
a motive to increase another’s welfare without regard for one’s self interests
Some argue that there is no such thing as true altruism
Egoism
a motive to increase one’s own welfare
Looking for your name in the back of a program after you donated
Egoism vs altruism
Emotion | Motive | Behavior |
Distress (upset, anxious, disturbed) | Egoistic motivation to reduce own stress | Behavior (possibly helping) to achieve reduction of own distress |
Empathy (sympathy and compassion for others) | Altruistic motivation to reduce others stress | Behavior (helping) to achieve reduction of other’s distress |
Why do people volunteer?
Career (job experience)
Understanding (hands on experience)
Enhancement (grow psychologically/ raise self-esteem)
Social (meet people)
Protective (get away from things/ troubles)
Values (concern for others, humanitarianism)
Disguised self interest
We do things, both helpful and not, that help ourselves
Social exchange theory
Human interactions are transactions that aim to maximize rewards and minimize costs
Empathy
We suffer at the thought of other people suffering
Social norms
Reciprocity norm- an expectation that people will help those who have helped them
Social responsibility norm- an expectation that people will help those dependent upon them
Evolutionary bases
Kin- altruism toward close relatives enhances survival of shared genes
Reciprocity- evolution has selected behaviors that lead others to help us when our lives are in danger
Bystander effect
We are less likely to help when there are other bystanders
Pluralistic ignorance
when others are present, we are less likely to notice/interpret an emergency
Diffusion of responsibility
when others are present, we are less likely to take responsibility
Stages of needing help supermarket example
Did they notice- have an employee routinely walk around the store, camera, staff meetings
Interpret as an emergency- have employee training about falls
Did they feel responsible- include helping customers in the job description, see something say something
Try to help- hold trainings
Who helps?
The Altruistic personality: Jew rescuers in Nazi occupied territories
Extensive moral orientation
Feelings of responsibility for those outside their families and community
Attachment and empathy, justice and caring for others
Belief in personal principles over laws and threats
Religion and helping
Extrinsic vs intrinsic
(extrinsic) Church attendee- observing rules, rituals, practices
(intrinsic) High power/ afterlife/ faith- sense of duty, responsibility
Intrinsic better for helping
Religious obligation
Karma in Hinduism and Buddhism
Charity in Islam
East vs west
Receiving help can trigger a loss of face
Eastern cultures tend to have stronger obligation to help family
Voluntary helping is valued in western cultures
Latin American cultures emphasize simpatica- an emphasis on social harmony and friendliness
Mood and helping
Dime planted in payphone
Confederate drops papers
People who found dime were more likely to help
Lost letter
People who found dime were more likely to put letter in mailbox
Who gets help?
Women over men
Those of similar race
People older than 60
Attractive people