1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Ideal of law
Justice
Distributive justice
Equal distribution amongst equals
Corrective justice
Aims to restore inequalities
Our legal process towards formal justice
Cases must be treated alike
Innocent until proven guilty
Legal positivism
Say law is and not what it ought to be
Morality and law are seperate
Judges’ role is mechanical as they just speak the law but do not create it
S v Adams and S v Werner 1981
- Coloured person left the area designated for coloureds under the Group Areas Act and was convicted
Natural law
Has moral and justice approach
The law is not only that which is promulgated, but ehat ought to be
Unjust law
Positive law conflicts with morality
Law has to be:
Certain
Predictable
Applied consistently
Fixed and certain content
Language
Laws are cast in language
Words don’t have fixed meanings
A word or sentence can have multiple meanings
Tool of legal argument
Changing values
Law needs to adapt and remain effective
Judges should take account of changing values
Judicial discretion
Interpretation of words/norms mean that judges has a discretion when applying the law
Judicial activism
Use their discretion in creatively interpreting the law to give effect to social change
Deference
Curtail their discretion by deferring to the executive or legislature derived from legal positivists outlook
Formal legal language characteristics
Formal language and archaic or foreign words are used
Formal style is apparent
Sentences are written in passive
Long and complicated sentences
Overly specific
Verbs are formed into nouns
‘shall’ is used repeatedly
Sentences are written as conditions
Plain Legal language
short and concise writing
avoid passive form
write in paragraphs
avoid negative formulations
use punctuality functionally
write in ordinary English
Legal argumentation
how we formulate an answer to a legal problem
Induction
Technique of argumentation where conclusion is drawn from specific facts
Judicial notice
Facts are so well known and evidence is not needed
e.g. sky is blue
Res Ipsa loquitur
Matter speaks for itself