Diagnostic Tests and Probability in Diagnostic Decision Making (week 4)

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/123

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 8:54 PM on 4/28/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

124 Terms

1
New cards

Diagnostic testing

used to determine a specific disease condition or possible illnesses

2
New cards

Four examples of diagnostic tests

-heartworm or FeLV test

-clinical pathology parameter

-clinical sign (such as cranial drawer test)

-radiographic sign

3
New cards

Three types of data

1.) nominal

2.) ordinal

3.) continuous

4
New cards

nominal data

results are either a "yes" or "no" such as SNAP tests for heartworm

5
New cards

ordinal data

data categorized as mild, moderate, severe or high, medium, low; ex is urinalysis strips

6
New cards

continuous data

scale with known intervals, such as kidney values or liver enzymes

7
New cards

for continuous data, there are _____-_____ values

cut-off

8
New cards

Test result

apparent disease status based on a diagnostic test result

9
New cards

The words ______ or ________ refer to a test result

positive; negative

10
New cards

Disease status

Presence or absence of a health condition; assumed or known

11
New cards

The words ________ or __________ refer to a disease status

diseased or not diseased

12
New cards

probability

The extent to which an event is likely to occur, measured by the ratio of the cases where the event occurs to the cases possible

13
New cards

probabilities will range between ____ and ___

0 (will never happen) and 1 (will always happen)

14
New cards

Probability can be defined at two levels:

1.) population level

2.) individual level

15
New cards

population level probability

The proportion of animals in a population with a test result or disease status

16
New cards

individual level probability

Probability of a test result or disease status within an individual

17
New cards

Pre-test probability

The likelihood that the animal has the disease prior to the

diagnostic test

18
New cards

Three things pre-test probability is influenced by:

1.) prevalence in the population

2.) risk factors

3.) clinical exam findings

19
New cards

Example of prevalence in the population and pre-test probability

The prevalence of Salmonella in dairy cows in Ohio is 10%. We randomly select a single dairy cow from Ohio. The probability of the cow of being positive for Salmonella (prior to a culture) is 10%

20
New cards

Example of risk factors and pre-test probability

Cows close to calving have twice the risk of being positive for Salmonella

21
New cards

Example of clinical exam findings and pre-test probability

Cow with diarrhea is more likely to have Salmonella

22
New cards

Two types of disease testing:

1.) screening for disease

2.) testing for diagnosis

23
New cards

screening for disease

Apparently healthy individuals are systematically tested for the purpose of detecting a (often subclinical) disease

24
New cards

When screening for disease, the pre-test probability is equal to the...

prevalence

25
New cards

Testing for diagnosis

Individuals with clinical signs of disease are tested with the aim of diagnosing disease

26
New cards

When testing for diagnosis, the pre-test probability will be the cumulative probability given (4):

1.) prevalence

2.) risk factors

3.) clinical history

4.) clinical signs

27
New cards

True positive

a positive test in an animal known to have the disease

28
New cards

False positive

a positive test in an animal known to not have the disease

29
New cards

True negative

a negative test in an animal known to not have the disease

30
New cards

False negative

a negative test in an animal known to have the disease

31
New cards
<p>1</p>

1

test positive

32
New cards
<p>2</p>

2

test negative

33
New cards
<p>3</p>

3

diseased

34
New cards
<p>4</p>

4

not diseased

35
New cards
<p>a</p>

a

true positive

36
New cards
<p>b</p>

b

false positive

37
New cards
<p>c</p>

c

false negative

38
New cards
<p>d</p>

d

true negative

39
New cards
<p>a + b</p>

a + b

total test positive

40
New cards
<p>c + d</p>

c + d

total test negative

41
New cards
<p>a + c</p>

a + c

total with disease

42
New cards
<p>b + d</p>

b + d

total without disease

43
New cards
<p>a + b + c + d</p>

a + b + c + d

total population

44
New cards

True prevalence equation

total diseased / total population

45
New cards

Apparent prevalence equation

total test positive / total population

*what is actually measured

46
New cards

Post-test probability

The likelihood that the animal has the disease after the diagnostic test

47
New cards

Post-test probability is aka...

predictive values

48
New cards

The post-test probability depends on two things:

1.) pre-test probability

2.) characteristics of the test (sensitivity and specificity)

49
New cards

If a test is useful, the post-test probability will be ________ than the pre-test probability

higher

50
New cards

If a test is worthless, the post-test probability will be ________ than the pre-test probability

lower

51
New cards

The magnitude of change between the pre and post-test probability depends on...

sensitivity and specificity

52
New cards

Some tests are better than others. How can we objectively measure test performance?

-Calculate sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV.

-apply measures of sensitivity and specificity in clinical scenarios

53
New cards

Sensitivity

The proportion of animals that test positive out of a number of animals known to have the disease

54
New cards

Sensitivity is the probability of a _________ test in an animal ________ to have the disease

positive; known

55
New cards

Equation for sensitivity

true positives / (true positive + false negative)

56
New cards

Specificity

The proportion of animals that test negative out of a number of animals known to not have the disease

57
New cards

Specificity is the probability of a ___________ test in an animal known to _______ _______ the disease

negative; not have

58
New cards

Specificity equation

true negative / (false positive + true negative)

59
New cards

In a group of ten cattle known to have a disease, if the sensitivity is 80%, how many test positive and how many test negative?

positive: 8 (true positive)

negative : 2 (false negative)

60
New cards

In a group of ten cattle known to not have a disease, if the specificity is 80%, how many test positive and how many test negative?

positive: 2 (false positive)

negative: 8 (true negative)

61
New cards

Positive predictive value

The proportion of positive test results that are from diseased animals

62
New cards

Positive predictive value is the probability of __________ in an animal with a __________ test result

disease; positive

63
New cards

Positive predictive value equation

true positive / (true positive + false positive)

64
New cards

Another way of looking at positive predictive value is, "now that I have a __________ test result, what is the probability it is correct?"

positive

65
New cards

Negative predictive value

The proportion of negative test results that are from non-diseased animals

66
New cards

Negative predictive value is the probability that an animal __________ have the disease when the test result is _________

does not; negative

67
New cards

Negative predictive value equation

true negatives / (true negatives + false negatives)

68
New cards

Another way of looking at negative predictive value is, "now that I have a ________ test result, what is the probability it is correct?"

negative

69
New cards

"Ruling in" a diagnosis

The diagnosis is sufficiently likely that no other possibilities should be considered

70
New cards

"Ruling in" a diagnosis is a result of having a high ________ predictive value

positive

71
New cards

"Ruling out" a diagnosis

The diagnosis is sufficiently unlikely that it should no longer be considered as a possibility

72
New cards

"Ruling out" a diagnosis is a result of having a high ________ predictive value

negative

73
New cards

Sensitivity and specificity represent a...

head-to-head comparison of diagnostic tests

74
New cards

Are sensitivity and specificity dependent on pre-test probability?

no!

75
New cards

Predictive values represent...

the level of certainty of a diagnosis

76
New cards

Are predictive values dependent on pre-test probability?

yes!

77
New cards

Test characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) are the probability of a __________ _________ when we know the _________ ________

test result; disease status

78
New cards

Predictive values (PPV and NPV) are the probability of a __________ _________ when we know the _________ ________

disease status; test result

79
New cards

Sensitivity is the probability of a _________ test result when we know an animal _________ diseased

Specificity is the probability of a _________ test result when we know an animal _________ diseased

positive; is diseased

negative; isn't diseased

80
New cards

Positive predictive value is the probability of a _________ when we know the test is __________

Negative predictive value is the probability of a _________ when we know the test is __________

disease; positive

lack of disease; negative

81
New cards

A lower sensitivity means there will be more...

false negatives

82
New cards

More false negatives means there will be a ___________ positive predictive value

higher

83
New cards

A lower specificity means there will be more...

false positives

84
New cards

More false positives means there will be a ___________ positive predictive value

lower

85
New cards
<p>Based on this information, fill out the table:</p>

Based on this information, fill out the table:

a: 175

b: 1

c: 33

d: 31

e: 208

f: 32

g: 176

h: 64

86
New cards
<p>Based on this information, calculate sensitivity and specificity:</p>

Based on this information, calculate sensitivity and specificity:

sensitivity: 175/208= 84%

specificity: 31/32= 97%

87
New cards

Three things you will need to calculate predictive values:

1.) pre-test probability

2.) sensitivity

3.) specificity

88
New cards

Five steps for calculating predictive values:

1.) start with hypothetical population (such as 10,000 animals)

2.) determine the number of diseased and non-diseased animals based on the pre-test probability

3.) apply the estimates for specificity and sensitivity

4.) complete the 2 X 2 table

5.) calculate the predictive values

89
New cards
<p>Fill out the 2 X 2 table based on the information given about bovine respiratory disease:</p><p>Signs of clinical illness have been shown to have a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 61.8% and 75.3%, respectively</p><p>In a feedlot of cattle, the prevalence of respiratory disease is 10%</p><p>If a single ride through doesn't identify a diseased calf, how sure are we that the calf doesn't have respiratory</p><p>disease?</p>

Fill out the 2 X 2 table based on the information given about bovine respiratory disease:

Signs of clinical illness have been shown to have a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 61.8% and 75.3%, respectively

In a feedlot of cattle, the prevalence of respiratory disease is 10%

If a single ride through doesn't identify a diseased calf, how sure are we that the calf doesn't have respiratory

disease?

1.) First choose a hypothetical population

total population: 1,000 cattle

2.) Determine the # of diseased and non diseased based on pre-test probability

total with disease: (1,000 x .10) = 100

total without disease: (1,000 - 100) = 900

3.) Apply the estimates for sensitivity and specificity

true positive: (.618 x 100) = 62

true negative: (.753 x 900) = 677

false positive: (900 - 677) = 233

false negative: (100 - 62) = 38

4.) Finish the table by addition

total test positive: (62 + 233) = 285

total test negative: (38 + 677) = 715

90
New cards
<p>Signs of clinical illness have been shown to have a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 61.8% and 75.3%, respectively</p><p>In a feedlot of cattle, the prevalence of respiratory disease is 10%</p><p>If a single ride through doesn’t identify a diseased calf, how sure are we that the calf doesn’t have respiratory</p><p>disease?</p>

Signs of clinical illness have been shown to have a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 61.8% and 75.3%, respectively

In a feedlot of cattle, the prevalence of respiratory disease is 10%

If a single ride through doesn’t identify a diseased calf, how sure are we that the calf doesn’t have respiratory

disease?

How sure we are that the calf doesn't have disease is asking for negative predictive value:

Negative predictive value = true negative / total test negative

Negative predictive value = 677 / 715 = 95%

91
New cards
<p>Fill out the 2 X 2 table based on the information given about heartworm disease:</p><p>A five-year-old outdoor</p><p>laboratory retriever presents to you for exercise intolerance, weight</p><p>loss, coughing, and fatigue.</p><p>The dog is not on heartworm</p><p>preventive and the SNAP test is positive</p><p>What's the probability that it is</p><p>correct, given a pre-test probability of 25%, sensitivity of 84%, and specificity of 97%?</p>

Fill out the 2 X 2 table based on the information given about heartworm disease:

A five-year-old outdoor

laboratory retriever presents to you for exercise intolerance, weight

loss, coughing, and fatigue.

The dog is not on heartworm

preventive and the SNAP test is positive

What's the probability that it is

correct, given a pre-test probability of 25%, sensitivity of 84%, and specificity of 97%?

1.) First choose a hypothetical population

total population: 10,000

2.) Determine the # of diseased and non diseased based on pre-test probability

total with disease: (10,000 x .25) = 2,500

total without disease: (10,000 - 2,500) = 7,500

3.) Apply the estimates for sensitivity and specificity

true positive: (.84 x 2,500) = 2,100

true negative: (.97 x 7,500) = 7,275

false positive: (7,500 - 7,275) = 225

false negative: (2,500 - 2,100) = 400

4.) Finish the table by addition

total test positive: (2,100 + 225) = 2,325

total test negative: (400 + 7,275) = 7,675

92
New cards
<p>A five-year-old outdoor</p><p>laboratory retriever presents to you for exercise intolerance, weight</p><p>loss, coughing, and fatigue.</p><p>The dog is not on heartworm</p><p>preventive and the SNAP test is positive</p><p>What’s the probability that it is</p><p>correct, given a pre-test probability of 25%, sensitivity of 84%, and specificity of 97%?</p>

A five-year-old outdoor

laboratory retriever presents to you for exercise intolerance, weight

loss, coughing, and fatigue.

The dog is not on heartworm

preventive and the SNAP test is positive

What’s the probability that it is

correct, given a pre-test probability of 25%, sensitivity of 84%, and specificity of 97%?

Probability the test is correct is asking for positive predictive value:

positive predictive value = true positives / total positives

positive predictive value = 2,100 / 2,325 = 90%

93
New cards

Continuous data

scale with known intervals, such as kidney values or liver enzymes

94
New cards

For a continuous data set, there are ____-____ values

cut-off values

95
New cards

Advantages to cut-off values for continuous data:

1.) communicating

2.) clinical decisions are often dichotomous

3.) necessary to calculate the post-test probability of disease

96
New cards

Disadvantage to cut-off values for continuous data:

oversimplification of complex disease processes

97
New cards

An increase in a cut-off value for continuous data will ________ the amount of false positives and ____________ the amount of true negatives

decrease; increase

98
New cards

An increase in a cut-off value for continuous data will _______ specificity

increase

99
New cards

A decrease in a cut-off value for continuous data will ________ the amount of false positives and _______ the amount of true negatives

increase; decrease

100
New cards

An decrease in a cut-off value for continuous data will _______ specificity

decrease