1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Bonaventure’s ways of seeing
eye of the flesh: using senses (empiricism)
knowledge of physical world
eye of reason: rationalism
knowledge of mathematics and philosophical truth
eye of contemplation
using faith to gain knowledge of god
Polkinghorne - binocular vision
eye of science to learn about physical processes in world
eye about spiritual truths of God and purposefulness of world
need both eyes
NT - seen in order of creation
paley’s design arg - loving God
bible: some writers claim this view e.g. Psalm 8 and romans 1
Calvin: analogy of world as mirror
“skilful ordering of the universe is for us a sort of mirror in which we can contemplate God” The institutes of the C religion
God manifests himself thru creation that works best thru human minds (humans finite)
we see =/= essence = appearance of God
‘sparks of glory’
principle of accommodation
god =/= in nature, nature reflects God’s beauty and orderliness
can understand God’s power and eternity, care for humanity, justice and mercy
thru senses and reasoning
Swinburne: world displays order, design, purpose
“best of all possible worlds”
NT - innate human sense of divine
humans imago dei - inbuilt capacity and desire to know god
opennes to beauty and goodness of God
intellectual ability to reflect on and recognise God’s existence
CofCat Church
“desire for God is written in the human heart”
“openness to truth and beauty”
Calvin: “sensus divinitatis” = sense of divinity
universal (even “ignorant” ppl)
conscience = God-given faculty which allos sense of moral judgement
John Henry Newman: when feel “responsibility”, “ashamed”, “frightened”
NL, Aqui - all have innate sense of fairness and justice
innate sense of morality: Butler, Newman, CS Lewis
guilt/ “inner voice”
Cicero
all cultures and times in history have had sense of infinite being
unaware of each other but similar
🙂 NT
everyone has access
long tradition
reasonable given sheer no. of ppl with some sort of faith
appreciation of awe and wonder take us beyond physical
diff level to material things
God can be known from earthly things
Aquinas
God revelas truths to us thru reason, reason can be used to access God
but gave up philosophising about God at end of life
writing ‘ike straw’
God basically unknowable
☹ NT
desire? Freud
not specific to one faith
is religion universal? (s.d.)
human supposed god-given characteristics not necessarily universal
not enough to gain personal knowldge
God’s nature beyond unaided human understanding
humans = fallible and sinful
fall
can’t know everything thu reason and NT
e.g. trinity, prodigal son → unlimited love of God
special importance of jesus lost
need faith
need guidance of church to understand god
order and purpose can be explained by other factors
awe from beauty =/= from God
RT
unveiling/ uncovering
knowledge God has chosen to show ppl
immediate revelation
direct
e.g. gave exact words to prophets to speak to their listeners
e.g. A&E with God before Fall (walked with them in Garden of E)
mediate revelation
< direct
e.g. reading about someone’s RE/ hearing religious ideas in sermon in church
bible = either
barth: God can only be revealed thru RT
result of God’s grace and accepted thru faith
RT - God’s grace
shown thru e.g. gift of wisdom, w of scripture, gift of faith, bringing ppl to salvation
leap to faith deepened thru life with church e.g. worship
Calvin: ‘firm and certain knowledge of God’s omnibenevolence to us’
Aquinas
empirical and logical knowledge - ‘scientia’
faith = voluntary choice
knowledge about diff things
faith =/= opinion = solid and certain
emotional level of redemption won by Jesus
faith = virtue
Cat church: need knowledge (reason) to access faith
John: diff between know and believe
can only have full knowledge when God chooses
HS = work of God in today’s world
give prophets of OT right words to say at right time
guide writes of scripture → w of God
give ppl wisdom to understand what is revealed
Calvin: ‘till the spirit has become our instructor, all that we know is folly and ignorance’
Acts 17 Luke
apostle Paul speaking in marketplace to ppl of Athens
‘to an unknown God’
desire to worship God (no context)
asks them to look for 1 cause, not be superstitious about little gods
God ‘does not live in temples built by human hands’
he is everywhere
God =/= idol made by humans
God makes us
tells them reason → some attributes of almighty God
grace gives them everything
Bible
both
NT
beauty
historical events
natural laws and design
RT
RE
scripture
person of Jesus
life of church
🙂 RT
only God can properly reveal something as indescribable as himself
e.g. RE
RT → special nature of Jesus, special importance emphaised
understanding Bible as revelead texts - shows God has left revelation for all to access
grace shows how humans need to appreciate God much > humans and require revelation
Kierkagard: ‘leap to faith’
can’t know everything thru reason/ empiricism
☹ RT
not useful to non-believers bc cannot interpret/ understand it
suggests God who only reveals in certain circumstances - biased
ppl who claimed God revealed himself might contradict with others
assumes C = correct revelation
Karl Barth
NT = idolatry = make up and worship false ideas
RT = only means
fallible human reason
BUT witnessed rise of Nazism
God ultimately revealed in christ
no truth in other religions
CA
too extreme
need human reason to judge true and false
contradictory ‘revealed truths’ in claiming God had disclosed truth to them
fall completely removed all natural human knowledge of God
Augustine - fall and OS
Karl Barth (protestant)
sinful nature
finite capacities
knowledge reached ourselves = distorted/ misleading
no need to work out God for ourselves as have already been given truth
fall HAS NOT removed all natural human knowledge of God
Aquinas (catholic)
God gave us reason and senses for purpose
+ RT so use BOTH
RT to guide reason and work out natural knowledge
e.g. 5 ways
against barth
bible suggests humans can gain natural knowledge of God
if Bible revealed by God and that revelation suggests we can learn truths naturally
x faith
Dawkins: “faith is the great cop-out”
Hume: ‘a wise man… proportions his belief to the evidence’
don’t believe without evidence
Jesus Christ
ultimate revelation of God to world
Calvin: J = ultimate mediator to understand God
J’s redemption of world = lens to see everything
see OT knowing incarnation saves humanity later in NT
lens strengthened by HS
Cat church
revelation gradual in OT
completed by J and no further revelation needed until end of time
revelation understood by
incarnation, only way to account for A’s sin
life and ministry of J
teachings
salvation thru crucifixion, overcoming death in resurrection
incarnation so that ppl could understand God at own level
bc God = infinite
reveals extent of God’s love for humanity e.g. miracles
J calming storms = God’s omnipotence over laws of nature
J healing ppl from leprosy, bleeding, blindness, paralysis reveals God’s grace in restoring ppl
raising of lazarus = god as giver of LAD
bible and church
liberals
fundmaentals
conservatives
Calvin: Bible = preparation for Christ (OT) + outworkings of Christ’s incarnation (NT)
RCX: God = author, written by breath of HS
Church helps understand scripture
church leaders → access God’s grace e.g. 7 sacraments
Calvin: Church = body of Christ
Martin Buber
belief that God exists diff to belief in God
relationship
so need BOTH
Emil Brunner
🙂 NT
conscience and sensus divinitas
can’t save ppl but → discussion that points to existence of God
awareness
Fall didn’t damage us on spiritual level, can still connect with God
NB both Brunner and Barth from Calvinist Reformed tradition
RT and NT are same
Pope JP II: "Faith and reason are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth."
Aquinas - they are complementary not separate