1/29
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Labor intensive
High % of expenses are in wages
High Wage
measured in $ not %
cottage industries
work done at home
cheap labor > transportation
Site Factor: Land
back: factories in cities. Built up over one story like today. Rural locations today
Site Factor: Capital
area familiar with type of industry = easier to borrow money
Central Europe
US outsource to:
human resources
Agglomeration
Similar industries benefit from factories nearby
-silicon valley
-hospitals near each other
outsourcing
moving individual steps in the production process to a supplier, who offers a cost savings
offshoring
outsourced work that is located outside of the country
right to work law
work must maintain “open-shop”, close shops are illegal
Close shop: everyone who works in the company is in a union. Part of salary is taken out to pay union fee
Open shop: union is optional
Where is Industry Expanding?
Large movement to the S and W
China
cheap labor and cheap consumer
SEZ- China
special tax incentives for foreign investments, mostly in populated areas, not for china’s benefits
America outsourcing
Pros: competitive, low labor costs, more ideas, frees up time
Cons: lost of control over process (Apple), sluggish response times, irate customer base, lost of company culture (loyalty)
India outsourcing
Pros: role for women, better-paying jobs, undermines caste system
Cons: discourages home growth, lost of culture (holidays, work culture, social norms), destroys small business, tradition vanishes
Fordist
each worker performs one task only
Multiplier effect
growth of something around something else
Economics of scale
cost advantages reaped by customers when production became efficient
increasing cost, lowering production
growth poles
agglomeration of high tech companies
Complementary trade
trade is greater if each side has something the other wants or needs
countries trading specialites with each other
Comparative advantages
one trade partner might be better at producing agricultural goods, while the other partner might be better at manufacturing products. Each will specialize at what they are good at
suburban sprawl
more miles for private transport in suburbs
more expensive pricing for houses
poverty in small urban areas
core cities paying more for services that are consumed by whole region but only paid by core residents
retail shops moving to suburbs
reverse commuting
city to suburbs
malls moving out, jobs are further away
gated communities
residential segregation: low-income people cannot purchase homes or travel without invitation here
megalopolis
cities combining into one
motor vehicles
pros:
comfort, choice, flexibility
low perceived cost
cons:
consumption of land
traffic congestion
social and physical challenges
underclass resident of inner cities
inadequate job skills
culture of poverty
homelessness
drugs
crime
filtering
filtering
housing unit becomes more affordable by age
old houses will become cheaper compared to new houses
pro if enough housing
con if shortage