1/52
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Language
distinctive to humans, flexible/evolving (slang), human communication/cooperation, mysterious
Language Definition
arbitrary system of communication, meaning is AS w/ symbols, mvmts, sounds
Language does
1) not require reading/writing → writing is recent, requires instruction, talking without reading/writing
2) not often use proper grammar → don’t always speak according to the rules for comprehension to be possible
3) may be separate from thought and cognition → thought preceded language → 1) think w/o language 2) think about language → different networks for cognition and language → ex. Infants → understand before speaking
Phonemes
smallest units of sound
vary by language, languages have diff sound libraries and distinctions
English (r/l) - Not in Japanese, Arabic (c/k) - Not in English, brain ties to native language by 1 year
Phonemes - Accent
sound distinctions in one language that aren't recognizable or differentiated in another
Morphemes
smallest units of meaning, ex. S (plural), un (changes meaning)
Making Words
parietal, frontal areas involved → vocal response, motor programs (speech/sound prod.)
Syntax
grammatical rules by which we construct sentences, varies by language
can recognize correct syntax even when a sentence is meaningless, ex. Colourless green ideas sleep furiously
correct syntax does not guarantee clear meaning, ex. we loving hurting people
Syntax - Ambiguity
ex. “Call me a cab” → very context-dependent and clear with context/experience
Contextual Information
important for understanding language, resolving ambiguity with context
Language Acquisition
learned by immersion into the language, slight innate ability to learn and use it
observational learning, experimentation, reinforcement, and shaping + innate ability to learn and use it
when language is absent in a population, they may develop one → Nicaraguan Sign Language + Creoles
ex. Creoles → forced labourers created language, ex. Nicaraguan Sign Language → isolated children
Language Acquisition - Development/Motivators
with age, sensitivity to non-native phonemes is lost, speech is slower in boys/bilingual homes
1) motivation for communication, 2) context varies (immersion), 3) neuroplasticity declines, 4) mechanisms of learning language change with age, 5) less likely to achieve native proficiency
Distribution Representation
any lobes can be involved in language, depending on task (speech prod, read, write) but language is thought to be partially separate from, but in connection with other cognitive networks
Language Lateralization
spoken + signed language are lateralized to left hemisphere, Wada Test or fMRI
Wada Test
invasive, use drugs to deactivate one hemisphere → task → measure performance
Implications of Lateralization
can still process information but cannot produce language
damage to left (stroke) → language impaired, cut corpus callosum → right hemisphere, appropriate actions
ex. Right stimuli → left hemi → verbal response, left stimuli → right hemi → no verbal, but can draw
Prosody
meaning of language can be affected by pattern of rhythm, pitch, stress, intonation
Linguistic
ex. “Lets eat grandma”, left hemisphere, IFG and STG
Affective
“i am fine” vs. “i am fine!” → emotion and right hemisphere
Aprosodia
seen in disorders, tendency to take things literally, right hemisphere injury
Music
speech is different than sound, speech → left lateral, inferior temporal, sound → right
Wernicke-Geschwind Model
brain areas though to be involved in two separate processes, older model
1) comprehension of written words → O (read) → T (comprehend) → P (articulation)
2) responses to heard question → T (auditory, hear) → T (comprehend) → P (articulation)
New Model for Language
1) Dorsal Pathway 1 → speech preparation, premotor cortex,
2) Dorsal Pathway 2 → syntax, pars opercularis, superior temporal gyrus
3) Ventral Pathway → word comprehension, STC (superior temporal cortex)
Visual Word Form Area (VMFA)
reading, left fusiform gyrus, recognizing words, objects, patterns
Neural Recycling
VMFA, brain area for a new purpose, originally visual pathway (object), now word
Lesion Studies
ventral temporal cortex lesions → category-specific semantic deficits
Suggestion → concept attached to these things are now mapped onto different parts of the brain
Dissociation Studies
some patients unable to name living, while others unable to name nonliving
Category-Specific Brain Activation
differences within and between categories (living, right) (tools, left)
ex. Cat morphs into dog → as the image changes, the portion of the brain that's responding, changes too
Bilinguals
different words are represented in different areas, but are similar across languages (-invariant)
Within a Category
specificity increases from domain-level at posterior (O/T) to specific-level at ant (MT)
patients with aphasia get the domain right but the specific name wrong
Concept Distinction Theories
1) Visual vs. Function Distinctions → living things defined by appearance, tools by utility
2) degree/kind of visual distinctions → living things have many visual features (complexity)
Brain Decoding
concepts → certain BAs in a predictive way → study brain → dictionary → BA → words
ERP
event-related potential, measured using EEG, neural activity related to brief mental process
Letter/Number
N/P → direction of potential (negative or positive), number → time after event
N400
process words in a sentence in context, words early may prime words expected later → when expectations are wrong (prediction error) → neural signal, the more unexpected = stronger signal (scaling)
not the result of surprise (ex. CAPITALS) but the result of surprising meaning (unusual word)
comprehension ability → amplitude is lower with injury, less surprised when we can’t understand
P600
syntactic violations (grammar errors), inferior frontal cortex active during complex syntactic processing
with experience, people exhibit a neural response to abnormal sentences in that language
N170
expertise with visual stimuli and reading proficiency, left-lateralized signal in reading experts (automatic), signal early in training is predictive of future reading proficiency
Aphasia
difficult in producing or understanding language, common after stroke
Dysarthria
difficulty in movement of muscles in producing language
Apraxia
difficulty in replicating actions
Dyslexia/Alexia/Hyperlexia
abnormal reading, inability to read, fixation but not comprehension
Strokes
interruptions in blood flow, in middle cerebral artery (MCA) of the brain
Word Comprehension
overlap with stroke lesion, include areas involved in comprehension, deficits common
Broca’s Aphasia
difficulty in producing language (non-fluent), comprehension less affected, aware of deficit
Broca’s Area (left inferior frontal, BA44), involved in motor for production, also impairs sign language
Treating Broca’s Aphasia
melodic intonation therapy (MIT), right hemisphere through music, re-routes
Wernicke’s Aphasia
receptive aphasia (meaningless sentences), unaware of deficit, left hemisphere damage → deficits in comprehension of sign language
Things to Remember
1) brain injuries affect many areas 2) brain areas have more than one function
Animal Vocalizations
specific sounds made in specific circumstances with clear meaning → ex. Rats laugh when tickled, male mice sing to find mates → most are food-associated vocalizations
Language vs. Vocalizations
species has limited number, tend to be for specific situations + specific meaning → not really emotional
human language is flexible, communicates infinite amount of ideas and interpretation is based on context
animals can learn human language but with low proficiency, do not generate own words or use w/e/o
Language Evolution
cortex development, white matter tracts (frontal), genetic mutations (FOXP2), vocal track
roots in gestural communications → ex. Mirror system for grasping, bipedal (free hands), tools → speaking
White Matter Tracts
humans have interconnected inferior F/P and lateral/inferior temporal, apes lack it
FOXP2
transcription factor, in basal ganglia, mutations in humans with impairments
adaptive variant accelraise language development, positive selection, transgenic mice = better performance