Exam 4 Study Guide: Complex Designs and Research Methods

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/37

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering complex research designs, small sample research, quasi-experimental designs, and threats to internal validity based on the provided exam study guide.

Last updated 1:19 AM on 5/5/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

38 Terms

1
New cards

Complex Design

A study with more than one independent variable (IV).

ex: ● IV1 = caffeine vs no caffeine

● IV2 = sleep vs no sleep

This creates a 2 × 2 design

2
New cards

Conditions

The total number of groups in a complex design, calculated by multiplying the levels of each IV (e.g., a 2imes22 imes 2 design equals 44 conditions).

3
New cards

Main Effect

The effect of one IV by itself, ignoring the other IV.

ex: If caffeine improves scores overall regardless of sleep condition → main effect of caffeine.

4
New cards

Interaction

Occurs when the effect of one IV depends on the level of another IV.

Example: Caffeine only helps when participants are sleep deprived.

5
New cards

Ceiling Effect

A phenomenon where scores are clustered near the top of the scale, making differences hard to detect.

6
New cards

Floor Effect

A phenomenon where scores are clustered near the bottom of the scale.

7
New cards

Number of IVs in a 2imes32 imes 3 design

count the numbers in the design.22 independent variables.

8
New cards

How many conditions?

multiply the levels

ex:

9
New cards

Possible Main Effects in a 2imes32 imes 3 design

22 possible main effects, one for each independent variable.

10
New cards

Possible Interactions with 33 IVs

There are 44 possible interactions total: AimesBA imes B, AimesCA imes C, BimesCB imes C, and AimesBimesCA imes B imes C.

11
New cards

Case Study

An in-depth examination of one individual or small group.

12
New cards

Phineas Gage

A famous brain injury case showing the role of the frontal lobe in personality.

13
New cards

Nomothetic

An approach that seeks general laws that apply to many people.

14
New cards

Ideographic

An approach that focuses on understanding one individual deeply.

15
New cards

Testimonial

A personal report or anecdote which constitutes weak scientific evidence.

16
New cards

Single Subject Experiment

Research focused on one participant measured repeatedly over time.

17
New cards

Baseline

The normal behavior of a participant measured before treatment.

18
New cards

ABAB Design

A research pattern consisting of baseline (AA), treatment (BB), removal of treatment (AA), and reintroduction of treatment (BB).

19
New cards

Reversal

The act of removing a treatment to see whether behavior returns to baseline levels.

20
New cards

Multiple Baseline Design

A design where treatment is introduced at different times across individuals, behaviors, or situations.

21
New cards

Quasi

Defined as "almost" experimental, but lacking full random assignment.

22
New cards

Wait List Control

A control group that receives treatment at a later time.

23
New cards

External Validity

How well results generalize to other people or settings.

24
New cards

Internal Validity Threats

Confounds that make it difficult to determine whether the IV caused the observed results.

25
New cards

History

A threat to internal validity where outside events affect the study participants.

26
New cards

Maturation

A threat to internal validity involving natural changes over time, such as children aging.

27
New cards

Testing

A threat to internal validity where the act of taking a test changes later performance.

28
New cards

Instrumentation

A threat to internal validity where measurement tools or observers change over time.

29
New cards

Regression to the Mean

A threat to internal validity where extreme scores naturally move toward the average upon retesting.

30
New cards

Attrition

A threat to internal validity where participants drop out of a study.

31
New cards

Selection

A threat to internal validity where groups differ before the study begins.

32
New cards

Contamination

A confound that occurs when groups in a study influence each other.

33
New cards

Experimenter Expectancy

When researchers unintentionally influence participants based on their own expectations.

34
New cards

Novelty Effects

Participants improve simply because a treatment or situation is new or interesting.

35
New cards

One-Group Pretest–Posttest Design

A design that measures participants before and after treatment without a control group.

36
New cards

Nonequivalent Control Group Design

A design that uses a comparison group without using random assignment.

37
New cards

Interrupted Time Series

A design involving repeated measurements before and after a treatment or intervention.

38
New cards

Time Series with Nonequivalent Control Groups

A design that adds a comparison group to an interrupted time series design.