Carnivorous Plants

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/8

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Exam 3

Last updated 5:15 PM on 5/4/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

9 Terms

1
New cards

Are all Carnivorous plants monophyletic?

No. Modern molecular data shows multiple origins of carnivorous plants, not just one.

2
New cards

Which order contains the most CP species?

Mostly Lamiales, because Lentibulariaceae includes Utricularia (~250 sp), Pinguicula (~80 sp), and Genlisea (21 sp).

>95% of carnivorous plant species belong to Lamiales or Caryophyalles

3
New cards

Givnish’s 1984 cost-benefit model

Carnivory evolves when the nutrient/photosynthetic benefits of capturing prey exceed the cost of making traps, It is favored in sunny, wet, nutrient-poor habitats.

4
New cards

Why high sunlight, low nutrients and wet habitat

Low nutrients make prey valuable; high sunlight provides enough carbon gain to “pay for” costly traps; wet conditions reduce the drought cost of modified leaves/traps. In shade or dry sites, the photosynthetic / water cost can outweigh benefits.

5
New cards
<p>How does Benzing’s model differ from Givnish’s model?</p>

How does Benzing’s model differ from Givnish’s model?

Benzing adds litter-derived nutrients as a third axis, along with light and moisture. Instead of carnivore being mainly restricted to sunny, wet, nutrient-poor sites, his model allows tradeoffs among light moisture, and litter availability, especially for bromeliads.

6
New cards

Ellison and Gotelli 2009: two models

  1. Energetics hypothesis: complex traps evolved through changes in regulatory/metabolic genes that helped meet the high energy demands of active traps.

  2. Predictable prey capture hypothesis: complex traps evolved because they capture prey more frequently and predictably.

7
New cards
<p>What does Figure 4 indicate?</p>

What does Figure 4 indicate?

Shows that carnivorous plant genera differ in prey specialization.

  • Low PIE = more specialized

  • High PIE = more generalized

Pitcher plants, such as Brocchinia, Nepenthes, and Sarracenia, were more specialized and captured many more ants, while Utricularia was more generalized

8
New cards

What is Cox1 and why is it significant?

Cox1 is a mitochondrial gene encoding subunit 1 of cytochrome C oxidase.

Its significant because changes in this gene may relate to energy metabolism, especially the energetic demands of active traps such as Utricularia bladders.

9
New cards

Which model fits best (Energetics or Predicatble Prey)?

The energetics hypothesis is better because the data does not match the predictable prey hypothesis.