1/42
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Case studies on changing leisure patterns
Saudi Arabia and USA
Saudi Arabia facts
67% of Saudi Arabia’s population is under 35
Saudi Arabia has now an e-visa to encourage more tourists
Saudi Arabia made sports a priority in 2016 as a part of 2030 Vision Programmes → three main objectives include: achieving a 40% participation rate, develop elite performance atheletes and grow and empower the sports commhnity
Saudi invested $1.8 billion into sports industry
Mass partcicipation and activity levele increases to 23% from 13% in 2015
Saudi is now home to 9 international sporting events
Saudi is undertaking a construction of a new $100 million Olympic village
Saudi is bulidng a new city: Qiddiya which aims to be a primer turist destination, with theme parks, cultural experineces and entertainemnt facilities. They want to diverse their economy and provide new jobs
Engagement in sport and leisure in Saudi Arabia
Historical constraints: Saudi had strict societal and cultural norms that limited women’s partciipiation in sports and reacrational activities. Wome’s access to sport facilities restricted
Recent reforms: Now want to increase women’s partcipiation. Now goverment introduced initatives to encourage physical activity amongst women
Sports education and facilities - now enhancing sports education for women. New gyms and sport clubs for women created
International participation: Saudi began sending female athletes to Olympics
Challanges and opportunities: Conservative attitudes reamins. Womes partcipation expected to improve further
USA
pop of over 331 million
IN 2022 95% of people engaged in sport or leisure activities on a daily basis
Rates for engagement slightly higher for men than women
Engagement in physical activites was around 73% over the last two decades
There is a link betwen income and activity levels: People with incomes below $25 000 are less liekly to do sports (60%) while people with higher icnome over $75 000 more likely to engage (80%)
Engagement in sport and leisure in the US
leisre time increases: american adults have gained 4-9 extra hours per week of leisure time since the 1960s due to shorter working weeks
Impact on low-wage earners - they have experiences a more significant icnrease in leisure time
Single-person household - in 2022 about 30% of househodl in US were single people
High wage vs low wage workers: hogh wage workers may allocated a higehr proportion of income to going out - average ameircan hosuehold spends $3008 per year on dining out
Income inequality growth - wealthies 1% accounts for 20% of welath in 2010, compared to 10% in 1969
Racism - median black household inocme is 61% of median while household income in 2018
Ethnic variation in leisure activites - 71% of whites, 60% of african americans, and 56% of hispanic reported playing video games
Student leisure habits: students spend on average 15 hours watching tv weekly and 5 hours per week partcipiating in organised activities
Changes in facility sizes: Cinemas an theatres replaces by multiplexes. Online stremang increased: Netflix had over 77 million subscribers in 2022
Evolution of leisure: 21st centrury trend towards home-based leisure such as online streaming services. Covid 19 saw an icnrease in lesiure options being promoted such as streaming exercise programs
Urban tourism hotspot
New York
New York facts
56.5 million visitors in 2022
over $40 billion in direct visitor spending
410 000 people emplyed in tourism in the city
Popular tourist attractions: times square, central park, statue of liberty, MET
Primary reosurces inlcude hisorical monumnets and museums
Secondary resources have been developed to provide for tourists including hotels retstaurants and modern museym
Challanges of tourism in New York
Brooklyn Bridge closed twice in 2018 due to overcrowding
Overselling of acess to the Statue of Liberty
Over 400 feet queue of people who wanted to see Empire Stata Bulding in July 2019
Tourism is seasonal due to climate peaks in sumer low in feb etc
2020 - tourism declined by 65% due to covid
New York strategies
Infrastrutcture development → A lot of transport and accomodation with over 120 000 rooms available in hotels and invetsment of $20 billion in airports
Marketing campaigns: „NYc Homecoming” provided weekly concerts to encourgae tourism, „It’s Time For New York City” campagin to attarct domestci and international tourists
Cultural events → New York Fashion Week
Sustainability inititaives → Bike sharing with Citi Bike, zero emission buses
Digital innovation → smart apps like „sit or squat” monitor cleanliness of toilets in city.
Collaboration with stakeholders → collaboration with business hotels and atraction to ensure a coordinated approach
New York city aim
Not to be seasonal
Increase transport 0 a new railway oepned in 2021 to relive pressure from penn Strett station
Rural tourism hotpost
Yosemite National Park in California
Yosemite facts
proetcetd area since 1864
Primary resource: landscape and ecosystems
Secondray reousce: built aorund primary
Park covers 1200 miles
Over 4 million visitors per year
special passes are needed for entry due to high numbers of visitors
Atractions: glacier point, yosemite falls (waterfall), sequoia tress, diverse ecosystems and El Capitan and the Half Dome (big mountanoius wall)
A lot of accomodtaion in the area including campsites and hotels
transporation availble by shuttle services
private cars can be used with a permit
Yosemite strategies
Annual Visitor Cap (restrictions on tourist numbers ) → prevents overcorwidng and damage to ecosystem
Shuttle servies → reduces car traffic traffic and individual emissions
Partnership with local communities → „Ask a Climber” program to learn about the hisory of the park
Habitat restortaion → Programs to proetct endangered species
Ecosystems studies → resrach carried out in area to adapt to climate change
Fire managemnts → controlled fires used to mainatin ecosystems
Visitor education → many progarsm showcasing how diffrent groups contributed to teh area
National Sports Leagues
Netball in Australia
Netball in Australia
Played with two teams of 7 people
Recognised as an Olympic Sport in 1995
Netball was intorduced in Australia 1897
Most popular women sport in Asutralia - over 1 million players nationwide
Foudning memebrs: New SOuth Wales, Queensland, South Australiam Victoria and Western Australia in 1927
Tasmania joined in 1933, Asurralian Capital Territory in 1975 and Nortehrn terriotiry in 1977
Oragnisation officaliy known as Netball Australia
National Domestic league calles: Suncorp Super Netball → 8 teams make it up: Thunderbirds, Ginats, Mavericks, Vixens, Swifts, Firebirds, Ligthing and Fever/ Season begins in March and ends in July
Average sallary for player is $89 221
Supprters of Netball
2023 over 265 000 fans attented a match
Games are also shown on television around teh world and on youtube
More teams located in east austraia
Netball venues
each team has their own venue with Swifts having the Sydney SUper Dome with a capacity of 18 000 in new South Wales and Lighting the UniSC Arena in queensland with only a capaicty of 3000 even though the team won in 2017 and 2018
Festival
Glastonbury
Worthy Farm in Somerset
Site of cultural tourism and temporarily site of leisure
Situated on many farms - 800 acres
Started in 1970
Many secondary tourist attractions
Dance classes, circus activities, workshops on craving plates
Price of ticket 360 pounds with 210 000 tickets available
Secondray resoucres: 400 food stalls, over 5000 toilets, two pharmacies and three medical centres
Factors affecting the location
Flat space → easy to occupy
Little disruption to local population as there are 10 000 people living there
Limitation: lack of proximity to major routes leading to congestion and air pollution
Economic costs of the festival
Clean up: 780 000 pounds
Total cost of festival: 22 milion pounds
Revenue: 82 million pounds
in 2016 the cost of security was 800 000 pounds and performers get around 2 million
Economic benefits
Emplyment given to local population
Visitors spend around 293 pounds
Some profits go to charity → Water Aid and Oxfam
Revenue helps in local projects → giving provisions to schools and sporting
Social impacts
Dealing, drugs, alcochol, substance abuse
2017 - 188 crimes reported with 71 arrested which is an increase from 2016 when 40 crimes reported → potentially linked to drug abuse
2015 - they organised blood donations to give back to the community
2007 - 700 journalists reported on festival
Environmental impacts
Noise pollution: until late night, disrupting residents a potential solution is organising silent discos
Air pollution: Increased CO2 emissions due to transport of people and equipment
Provision of resources: High energy consumption - 120 generators. 1 million gallons of food and water
Waste - due to large crowds which is expensive to clean (780 000 pounds)
TNC’s and global tourism case study
Thomas Cook - oldest travel company - began in 1841 in England
How do TNC’s affect international tourism
Cheaper travel: due to economies of scale. → Having the same website to deal with several diffrent countries and changing the language that appears on screen. → Skyscanner enables 60 mil customers to view identical info in more than 30 languages each month. They also have only 10 regional offices saving money. TNC’s also encourage competition by price chekcing sites people can compare prices
Simpler travel: package holidays. Thomas Cook offers full package tours from arrival on airport to back home. The travel company does everything for the tourists. Diffrent comapnies also offer local tours in many countries in diffrent languages
More accessible travel: Airlines and airports expanding. Building of smaller airports such as Modlin and developemnt of low cost airlines like Ryanair and Easy Jet allow for more people from diffrent regions to travel.
Horizontal versus vertical tourism integration
Vertical integration: company owns each step of tourism including travel agent,airline, coach company, hotel and tour guides. For many years it was easier to make a proft this way
Horizontal integration: company owns sevral companies offering the same level of tourism. Many airlines are owned by airline groups allowing to make a greater profit as when buying airplanes they can negioatte a better discount for more planes
Industry consolidation
Many brands in travel are owned and operated by the same parent company → making it cheaper for tourists to travel
Costs of TNC involvement in tourism for diffrent stakeholders
Tourist → lack of choice due to consolidation and prices may be higher because of lack of competition with TNC’s
Tourism employee at destination → little choice of job opportunites as TNC’s are the only employed. Much monmey repatriated back to host country. Sometimes poor working conditions
Local person → Loss of local culture and political power compared to TNC’s
People intrested in development and environemntal issues → more people traveling for longer leads to more pollution - noise, water and visual
Benefits of TNC’s for diffrent stakeholders
Tourist → lower prices due to economies of scale, similar experince regardless of location, can speak own langauge when on holiday
Tourism employee at destination → job opportunities, possible training, international standards in terms of contracts (paid leave, fixed hours)
Local person → Investment of TNC’s in local infarsturcture like airports can stimulate the economy
People intrested in development and environmental issues → TNC’s are barnd counscious and often have sustinability policies and support charities
Unsustinable tourism case study
Venice
Venice facts
series of islands of the Adriatic Sea
700 heactres
carrying capacity of Venice: 9780 who use hotel accomodation, 1460 staying in non hotel and 10857 day trippers on a daily basis
Annual carrying capacity: 8 million people
Known as „City of Water”
Population: 50 000 peole
50 000 day trippers daily → exceeding carrying capacity which is 20 000
Annually 20 million tourists
Often day tripper
Decrease of local population from 120 00 in 1960 to 50 000 in 2025
Many attractions: St Marks Basilica and Gondolas → Gondolas are a secodnray attraction
Socio-political conflicts between locals and tourists
Venetians complain of the loss of culture as for example tourists go to St.Marks Basilica and take photos during massess
Many day trippers → no added value only leave polution
Large cruise ships → block natural beauty and the locals protest against them
Congestion and overcrowding
Disrespect of historical and herritage sites
Tourist pigeon culture: tourists give food to the pigeons on St Marks square causing the pigeons to poop everywhere and its acidic so destoys the infrastucture
Inflation → causing many to move as cant afford necesities
Local services become overpriced like the post office or medical causing migration
Management of unsustainable tourism in Venice
5 to 11 euro tax to visit
banned unauthorised coach trips
People that travel by car may be tuned away if they have not pre-booked parking
People have to buy tickets and come on specific days
They limited the cruize ship size since 2014 by 20% while ships who weigh over 96 000 tonnes are banned. Cruise ships banned from historic centre of venice
torugroups limited to 25 people
Some routes are one way
There are stict rules and fines for breaking rules from 25 to 500 euros
Vendors were banned from selling grains for pigeons
Builidng more affordable housing → not working
Stewards patrol St Mark’s Square reminding toruists to throw away their litter etc
Encouraging drinking from drinking fountains
Maldives facts and figures
archipelago of 1190 island only 200 inhabited
pop of 300 000
temps 26-31 celcius
400 000 tourist annually
tousim: 26% of GDP
90% of tax revenue comes from import
Growth fo tourism led to decraese in fishing and growth of eocnomy and job opportuniyties, multiplier effec
garment production, biats bulding and handicrafts now only 7% of GDP
Maldives vulnerbaility to external shocks
sea level rise - average only 1.5 m abose sea level - lowest on earth, predocted that sea will rise by 59 cm by 2100
Tsunamis - islands in tectonically active zone badly afected by tsunami in 2004 killing 100 people dispalcing 12 000 and causing $300 million of property damage
maldives vulnerability to internal limitations
High consumption of energy and water - toruist conume more than average amldivian - almost all wate prdiuced by desliantion and all eneegy produced by generator except on Male and Hulhule isnalds
Pollution - solid and liquid wsste is dumped to landfill sites, incinerated or dumped at sea - all unsustianable
maldevies strategy
All new trousim development must:
produce mitigation against flood - a 40 m setback from high water mark
Compulsory instalation of incinerators, bottle crushers and compactors
Must have own waste water traetment plan - instaling deasliantions plants
Maledives aim
carbon neutarlity within decase
encouraging wind and solar energy
foreign investment
and icnrease employemny
Hosting an international event
London 2012 Olympic Games
Advanatges of hosting the Olympics
helped regenarte one of London’s poorest areas
Created 12 000 jobs
17 billion pounds spent on upgrading infrastucture
2800 new homes buit - 50% affordable housing
1.2% reduction in London’s unemployment
46 000 people worked at the Olympic Park - 10% previously unemployed
Women found jobs - 266 placed in construction
30 billion pounds spent to transform the Olympic iste into „Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park” whihc included housing, new schools, healt centres, business space and sport venues
2800 flats created
6.5 billion pounds invsted into infrastcuture
10 million pounds to upgrade pedestrain cycling routes
90% of demolition waste recycled
62% waste reused, recycled or composted
Encouraged biodiveristy: 300 000 plant were planted in the area
1000 new trees planted in East London
Disadvanatges of hosting the Olympics
Cost 11 billion pounds - stadium 560 million, atheletes village and park 650 million, securit 200 million, running the games 1.5 billion
Received 675 million pounds lottery funding which could have gone elsewhere
peopelp and business forced to relocate
Increased inequalities as Lodnon and South East received funds
still the area is deprived compared to West London
Waiting list for social housign in the area is 22 000 with only 28% affrodable
Still higher unemployment rate than London’s average
Eco tourism in LIC
The Gambia
meeting the needs of the present without comprosmising the needs for future generations