1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
New Confucianism 當代新儒學
Its symbolic origin is the 1958 manifesto:
Tang Junyi.
Mou Zongsan.
Xu Fuguan.
Zhang Junmai / Carsun Chang.
The manifesto asks the West to understand China through Chinese values.
It presents Chinese culture as continuous Confucian thinking.
New Confucians also argue Confucianism must be open to modern science.
They admit China focused too much on morality and neglected logic/mathematics.
Politically, they support openness to modern democracy.
They claim Confucianism already contains democratic roots:
Mencius says government should benefit the people.
People may revolt against bad rulers.
Everyone has ren 仁 and can become wise.
They argue democracy did not develop in China because of social and academic conditions, not because Confucianism was inherently anti-democratic.
oppose Marxism-Leninism.
They contrast:
Western square penetration: logical, abstract, deductive.
Chinese round penetration: holistic, particular, contextual.
Goal:
Mutual learning between China and the West.
Philosophical and political understanding.
Global harmony.
The First Generation New Confucians
Main figures:
Feng Youlan.
Liang Shuming.
China is between Western individualism and Indian denial of individuality.
Chinese tradition has a future.
Opposed May Fourth anti-traditionalism.
Xiong Shili.
Philosophical knowledge comes through intuition.
Knowledge must express itself in practical life.
Emphasized the religious dimension of Confucianism.
Zhang Junmai.
Developed political New Confucian theory.
Wanted harmony between East and West.
Supported combining Confucian virtue-rule with Western democracy.
Qian Mu.
Defended traditional Chinese culture against New Culture critiques.
Argued Confucian dynasties often limited imperial power through institutions.
Confucian literati protected the people against absolute monarchy.
The Second Generation
He Lin forms the transition to the second generation.
He studied in the US and translated Western philosophy.
He helped give New Confucians their name.
Tang Junyi
Left China in 1949.
Established New Asia College in Hong Kong with Qian Mu.
New Asia College became a major New Confucian center.
sees the Confucian sphere as the highest because it unites human and Heaven.
Xu Fuguan
Confucianism is inseparable from Chinese culture.
Confucius represents the whole historical-cultural tradition, not just one school.
Rejects forcing Confucianism into metaphysics.
Wrong to try and modernize confucianism.
Its ethics arise from daily life and aim to improve society.
Confucian ethics may help the West escape metaphysical/religious crisis.
Politically, virtue allows every citizen to become a political actor.
Supports combining Confucian political ideals with democracy.
Mou Zongsan also belongs to this second generation.
Tang Junyi’s system has three directions and nine spheres:
Objective direction:
Difference between individual things.
Classification by type/category.
Cause-and-effect relations.
Subjective direction:
Reflection and sensory perception.
Reflection on reflection, including language, literature, arts, math, logic, philosophy.
Moral action and ethical choice.
Transcendental direction:
Monotheistic religion, belief in one God.
Buddhist emptiness.
Confucian unity of Heaven and humanity.
The Third Generation
Third generation = pupils of Mou Zongsan, Tang Junyi, and Xu Fuguan.
They mostly lived in Hong Kong, Taiwan, or the US.
Main figure:
Du Weiming 杜維明
Du Weiming’s “third era” of Confucianism:
First era: Confucius.
Second era: Song Neoconfucian revival.
Third era: modern/global Confucianism after confrontation with the West.
would be wrong to say confucianism is just political
He agrees with Radical Confucians:
The problem was not Confucianism itself.
The problem was state use of Confucianism.
Confucian humanism
concept of Du Weiming
Puts humans first.
Does not oppose nature or Heaven/God.
Supports unity of Heaven and humanity.
The Fourth Generation
From the 1990s, a fourth generation is identified.
Confucianism became more popular because of the economic rise of:
Japan.
Korea.
Taiwan.
Hong Kong.
Singapore.
New Confucians used this to argue Max Weber was wrong that Confucianism blocks democracy/industrial progress.
Confucianism also returned in mainland China.
Difference:
PRC New Confucians often focus on Xunzi.
The PRC use of harmony under Hu Jintao has links to Xunzi’s disciplinary idea of social order.
Taiwanese New Confucians often focus on Mencius.
Confucian Constitutionalism
China’s reform/opening after the late 1970s made it a major economic and political power.
This encouraged renewed interest in Confucianism.
Jiang Qing proposed Confucian constitutionalism as an alternative to:
CCP rule.
Western liberal democracy.
Jiang Qing Confucian constitutionalism system
Jiang Qing’s system is tricameral: he wants a king back
House of Ru = Heaven, natural morality.
The House of Ru is selected by Confucian scholars.
House of the Nation = Earth, history and culture.
The king selects members of the House of the Nation.
House of the People = Man, popular will.
Only the House of the People is elected, and even then from restricted candidates.
A hereditary descendant of Confucius acts as symbolic king.
Conditions for implementation:
Restore Confucianism fully.
Train Confucian scholars.
Integrate Confucianism into the constitution.
But this is based on the gongyangzhuan, so not the earliest. this has influence from outside influence
Critiques on Jiang Qing Confucian constitutionalism system
Jiang relies on Gongyang zhuan, which is not the earliest Confucian doctrine and contains non-Confucian influence.
His system may be influenced by Christianity, especially the transcendent Heaven and Academy.
China is not purely Confucian; it is also Daoist, Buddhist, Christian, Islamic, popular religious, and modern/pluralist.
Imposing Confucianism today risks oppression.
Past attempts to revive Confucianism politically failed.
Liberal democracy does not necessarily destroy values people actually care about.
Confucians are not morally superior by default.
A descendant of Confucius is not automatically politically/morally pure.
Harmonious Society
Since reform and opening, China described its rise as:
Peaceful rise 和平崛起
Peaceful development 和平發展
Harmonious society 和諧社會
to go to a Harmonious world 和諧世界
projects Chinese values globally.
The “China model” presents China as an alternative development path for Africa/Latin America and other postcolonial societies.
This reverses the nineteenth-century hierarchy:
Instead of China being judged by Europe,
Europe/world is now judged through Chinese/Confucian categories.
Beijing Consensus
Economic liberalization.
Authoritarian political control.
Alternative to the Western “Washington Consensus.”
Problem harmonious world
Harmony often means conformity.
In China, harmony can mean compliance with CCP-defined order.
Internationally, this raises the question:
Does “harmony” mean respecting difference?
Or transforming others into sameness?
Another issue:
“Harmony” is used for everything in China, so it risks meaning nothing.
Even if East Asia still has Confucian political culture, that does not prove:
It should stay that way.
People want it that way.
Confucianism should be exported.
Confucian values changed throughout history.
Absorbing Western values would change Confucianism too.
Many Chinese, especially younger people, are inspired more by liberal values than by Confucianism.
Hu Angang’s view
Hu Angang’s view:
Harmonious world abolishes borders and gaps.
Civilizations merge into a shared destiny/community.
China leads the Global South against the Global North.
China must break Northern cultural hegemony.
What has been defrosted cannot be deep-frozen again
Contemporary China’s rise forces Europe to rethink itself.
Europe is no longer only the one defining the “Other”; Europe itself becomes the Other from China’s perspective.
Once Confucianism has been revived, reinterpreted, and globalized, it cannot simply be frozen back into its old imperial form.
The key lesson:
Do not only see others as we see them.
Try to see others as they see themselves.
Mao’s quote to Nixon captures the syllabus’s final point:
Even revolutionary China could only change parts of China’s ancient civilization.
Deep civilizational continuities remain.