Similarity-Rights protection

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 6:09 PM on 5/27/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

12 Terms

1
New cards

Topic 1

Freedom of rights and expression 

2
New cards

US 1

Both US and UK uphold freedom of speech and expression as core democratic principles. In the US, this right is protected under the First Amendment, allowing individuals to voice opinions freely, as demonstrated by landmark ruling like counterman v Colorado (2023) clarifying rules around what counts as illegal ‘true threats’ vs protected free speech

3
New cards

UK 1

In the UK, freedom of speech is safeguarded through common law and the Human Rights Act 1998, aligning with article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).  

For instance, UK courts have defended press freedom in cases involving public interest journalism, like ZXC v Bloomberg LP (2021) 

4
New cards

Similarity 1

Cultural theory

- shared liberal democrat culture with both societies strongly valuing civil liberties with both countries provide strong legal frameworks to uphold freedom of expression, with protections against gov infringement on speech. 

5
New cards

Topic 2

Role of independent judiciary in upholding rights

6
New cards

US 2

Both US and UK have independent judiciaries that interpret and uphold citizens’ rights.  
US, the judiciary protects rights through judicial review, the power which derives from the landmark 1803 case Marbury v. Madison, cementing the Court's authority to declare any law invalid if they violate the Constitution 

 
Example: 

cases like Obergefell v Hodges (2015), which extended marriage equality. 

7
New cards

UK 2

Similarly, in UK, judiciary applies the Human Rights Act to review government actions to uphold rights, such as in Rwanda Bill 2024 Supreme Court ruling that declared the Rwanda policy unlawful due to risks of "refoulement", declaring acts of incompatibility with HRA 

8
New cards

Similarity 2

Structural analysis;

Rights protection in both countries sit with the judiciary through formal legal channels (Article III in USA, HRA 1998 in UK).

and both judicial systems serve as independent judge in protecting individual rights, ensuring executive actions align with legal and constitutional principles.  

9
New cards

Topic 3

Protection against discrimination 

10
New cards

US 3

Both countries enforce robust anti-discrimination protections. In the US, federal laws like Civil Rights Act 1964 prohibit discrimination based on race, gender, religion, and more, with recent expansion including protection of LGBTQ+ individuals under the Civil Rights Act in Bostock v Clayton Country (2020) 

11
New cards

UK 3

In UK, the Equality Act 2010 offers similar protections, making it unlawful to discriminate based on characteristics like race, gender, age and disability, with For women Scotland v Scottish ministers 2025 clarifying the meaning of sex to biological sex under the act.

12
New cards

Similarity 3

structural theory,

Anti discrimination protection in both systems rest on formal statute (civil rights act 1964 in USA and Equality Act 2010 in UK), ensuring enforcement of framework on all legislation and gov action, protecting individual against discriminatory practices