BUS 404 Governmental and Social Influences on Business - Final Exam Study Guide

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/23

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering employment discrimination (Title VII, ADEA, ADA), Section 1981, sexual harassment liability, and consumer protection laws (FTC Act, puffery, and relevant case law).

Last updated 5:28 PM on 6/10/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

24 Terms

1
New cards

EEOC Complaint Filing Period

The requirement for an employee to file a discrimination complaint with the EEOC within 180180 days of the incident, or 300300 days if a state filing exists.

2
New cards

Forced Arbitration

A confidential process some employers require instead of a court lawsuit. Under this, the EEOC can still bring a court claim on the employee's behalf even if the employee is restricted.

3
New cards

At Will Employee

An employment classification where an individual can generally be fired for any reason, offering fewer protections than a formal employment contract.

4
New cards

Disparate Treatment

Intentional discrimination where an employer treats an individual differently specifically because of a protected class status.

5
New cards

Disparate Impact

Unintentional discrimination involving a facially neutral policy that results in a discriminatory effect on a protected class based on statistics.

6
New cards

Pretext

A false reason provided by a defendant to hide the true, discriminatory motive for an employment action.

7
New cards

Business Necessity Defense

A defense in a Disparate Impact case where the employer proves the policy is both job-related and consistent with the needs of the business.

8
New cards

Title VI

A federal law governing government employment; it allows for disparate treatment claims but generally does not recognize disparate impact claims at the federal level.

9
New cards

Section 1981

Part of the Civil Rights Act of 18661866 that applies only to race and ethnicity discrimination, has no cap on compensatory/punitive damages, and features a 44-year statute of limitations.

10
New cards

Tangible Employment Action

A significant change in employment status, such as firing, demotion, or reassignment, resulting from sexual harassment which triggers strict employer liability if committed by a supervisor.

11
New cards

Hostile Work Environment

Unwelcome conduct because of sex that creates an abusive environment without necessarily resulting in a tangible employment action.

12
New cards

Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ)

A narrow exception allowing discrimination based on religion, sex/gender, or national origin when essential to the job; notably, BFOQ never applies to race or color.

13
New cards

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)

A law protecting workers age 4040 and older at companies with 2020 or more employees.

14
New cards

ADEA Forced Retirement Exception

A rule allowing forced retirement for high-level executives age 65+65+ who receive annual retirement benefits of at least 44,00044,000.

15
New cards

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

Prohibits discrimination based on physical or mental impairment and requires reasonable accommodations for qualified individuals unless it causes undue hardship.

16
New cards

Undue Hardship

An ADA defense where a requested accommodation is considered unreasonable because it requires significant difficulty or expense.

17
New cards

FTC Two-Factor Legal Test

To violate the FTC Act, a trade practice must be (1) false or likely to mislead a reasonable consumer and (2) material to the consumer's decision-making.

18
New cards

Puffery

In consumer protection, expressions of opinion or inherently vague and generalized terms (e.g., 'reliable' or 'durable') that are not objective, verifiable facts.

19
New cards

Tudor v. Jewel

A grocery scanner case where a 44%44\% error rate was found not to be 'unfair' because accurate receipts were provided and returns were accepted, negating intent to deceive.

20
New cards

ALDF v. Hormel

Established that compliance with USDA labeling regulations does not automatically equate to compliance with the FTC Act's false advertising standards.

21
New cards

FTC v. Kraft Singles

A case where a technically true statement about using 55 ounces of milk was a violation because it created a false impression regarding calcium content.

22
New cards

Williams v. Gerber

A consumer protection case ruling that accurate fine print (Nutrition Facts) cannot excuse potentially deceptive statements or images made prominently on the front of product packaging.

23
New cards

Social Media Disclosure Rule

FTC requirement that influencers disclose affiliations if they received something a reasonable consumer would think likely affects their opinion.

24
New cards

FIRAC

A structured legal analysis framework consisting of Facts, Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion.