1/76
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
📚 AP Gov Flashcards – 3.3–3.5 Speech, Press, Expression, Guns
🧠 Core Concepts
Clear and Present Danger Test
Speech can be limited if it creates an immediate threat to public safety; significant because it established that free speech is not absolute.
Prior Restraint
Government censorship of speech or publication before it happens; significant because it is usually unconstitutional and protects press freedom.
Symbolic Speech
Nonverbal actions that express ideas (like protests); significant because it expands First Amendment protections beyond just words.
⚖️ Supreme Court Cases (Speech & Press)
Schenck v. United States
Facts
Schenck distributed leaflets urging people to resist the draft during WWI.
Relevant Clause
1st Amendment (Freedom of Speech)
Decision
Ruled against Schenck.
Reasoning
Speech that creates a “clear and present danger” (like interfering with the draft) can be restricted.
Significance (baked in)
Set early limits on speech during wartime and introduced the clear and present danger test.
🎯 Modern Standard for Political Speech
Government can only restrict political speech if it passes strict scrutiny (must serve a compelling interest and be narrowly tailored); significant because it makes political speech highly protected today.
New York Times v. United States
Facts
The government tried to stop the New York Times from publishing the Pentagon Papers (classified documents about Vietnam).
Relevant Clause
1st Amendment (Freedom of Press)
Decision
Ruled in favor of the New York Times.
Reasoning
No sufficient justification for prior restraint; government cannot censor publication without extreme necessity.
Significance (baked in)
Strengthened press freedom and limited government censorship.
Tinker v. Des Moines
Facts
Students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War and were suspended.
Relevant Clause
1st Amendment (Freedom of Speech)
Decision
Ruled in favor of students.
Reasoning
Students do not lose free speech rights at school unless it disrupts learning.
Significance (baked in)
Protected student symbolic speech in schools.
🚫 Limits on Freedom of Expression
Libel & Slander
False statements that damage someone’s reputation (written = libel, spoken = slander); can be limited because they harm others and are not protected speech.
Hate Speech
Offensive speech targeting groups; generally cannot be limited unless it incites violence; significant because even offensive speech is often protected.
Obscenity & Pornography
Sexually explicit material lacking serious value; can be limited because it is not protected under the First Amendment.
Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions
Government can regulate when, where, and how speech occurs (not content); can be limited if rules are neutral and reasonable to maintain order.
🔫 3.5 Second Amendment
McDonald v. Chicago
Facts
Chicago banned handguns; citizens challenged the law.
Relevant Clause
2nd Amendment + 14th Amendment (Selective Incorporation)
Decision
Ruled against Chicago.
Reasoning
The right to bear arms is fundamental and applies to the states through the 14th Amendment.
Significance (baked in)
Extended gun rights to state/local governments nationwide.
🔗 Connection Case
District of Columbia v. Heller
Established an individual right to own firearms for self-defense at the federal level; significant because it defined the 2nd Amendment as an individual (not just militia) right.