📚 AP Gov Flashcards – 3.3–3.5 Speech, Press, Expression, Guns

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/76

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:39 PM on 4/13/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

77 Terms

1
New cards

📚 AP Gov Flashcards – 3.3–3.5 Speech, Press, Expression, Guns

2
New cards
3
New cards

🧠 Core Concepts

4
New cards
5
New cards

Clear and Present Danger Test

Speech can be limited if it creates an immediate threat to public safety; significant because it established that free speech is not absolute.

6
New cards
7
New cards

Prior Restraint

Government censorship of speech or publication before it happens; significant because it is usually unconstitutional and protects press freedom.

8
New cards
9
New cards

Symbolic Speech

Nonverbal actions that express ideas (like protests); significant because it expands First Amendment protections beyond just words.

10
New cards
11
New cards

⚖️ Supreme Court Cases (Speech & Press)

12
New cards

Schenck v. United States

13
New cards
14
New cards

Facts

Schenck distributed leaflets urging people to resist the draft during WWI.

15
New cards
16
New cards

Relevant Clause

1st Amendment (Freedom of Speech)

17
New cards
18
New cards

Decision

Ruled against Schenck.

19
New cards
20
New cards

Reasoning

Speech that creates a “clear and present danger” (like interfering with the draft) can be restricted.

21
New cards
22
New cards

Significance (baked in)

Set early limits on speech during wartime and introduced the clear and present danger test.

23
New cards
24
New cards

🎯 Modern Standard for Political Speech

25
New cards
26
New cards

Government can only restrict political speech if it passes strict scrutiny (must serve a compelling interest and be narrowly tailored); significant because it makes political speech highly protected today.

27
New cards
28
New cards

New York Times v. United States

29
New cards
30
New cards

Facts

The government tried to stop the New York Times from publishing the Pentagon Papers (classified documents about Vietnam).

31
New cards
32
New cards

Relevant Clause

1st Amendment (Freedom of Press)

33
New cards
34
New cards

Decision

Ruled in favor of the New York Times.

35
New cards
36
New cards

Reasoning

No sufficient justification for prior restraint; government cannot censor publication without extreme necessity.

37
New cards
38
New cards

Significance (baked in)

Strengthened press freedom and limited government censorship.

39
New cards
40
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines

41
New cards
42
New cards

Facts

Students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War and were suspended.

43
New cards
44
New cards

Relevant Clause

1st Amendment (Freedom of Speech)

45
New cards
46
New cards

Decision

Ruled in favor of students.

47
New cards
48
New cards

Reasoning

Students do not lose free speech rights at school unless it disrupts learning.

49
New cards
50
New cards

Significance (baked in)

Protected student symbolic speech in schools.

51
New cards
52
New cards

🚫 Limits on Freedom of Expression

53
New cards
54
New cards

Libel & Slander

False statements that damage someone’s reputation (written = libel, spoken = slander); can be limited because they harm others and are not protected speech.

55
New cards
56
New cards

Hate Speech

Offensive speech targeting groups; generally cannot be limited unless it incites violence; significant because even offensive speech is often protected.

57
New cards
58
New cards

Obscenity & Pornography

Sexually explicit material lacking serious value; can be limited because it is not protected under the First Amendment.

59
New cards
60
New cards

Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions

Government can regulate when, where, and how speech occurs (not content); can be limited if rules are neutral and reasonable to maintain order.

61
New cards
62
New cards

🔫 3.5 Second Amendment

63
New cards

McDonald v. Chicago

64
New cards
65
New cards

Facts

Chicago banned handguns; citizens challenged the law.

66
New cards
67
New cards

Relevant Clause

2nd Amendment + 14th Amendment (Selective Incorporation)

68
New cards
69
New cards

Decision

Ruled against Chicago.

70
New cards
71
New cards

Reasoning

The right to bear arms is fundamental and applies to the states through the 14th Amendment.

72
New cards
73
New cards

Significance (baked in)

Extended gun rights to state/local governments nationwide.

74
New cards
75
New cards

🔗 Connection Case

76
New cards
77
New cards

District of Columbia v. Heller

Established an individual right to own firearms for self-defense at the federal level; significant because it defined the 2nd Amendment as an individual (not just militia) right.