1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What was the primary purpose of the study by Dell et al. (2019)
To measure the objectives of a canine AAT program in a Canadian psychiatric prison and examine if it supported inmates' correctional plans. It was the first study of its kind in a Canadian psychiatric correctional facility.
What research design was used in the study?
A modified instrumental case study design. It involved three inmates over a 24-session program and used both quantitative (questionnaires) and qualitative (interviews) data.
What were the two measurable objectives of the RPC AAT program?
1. Whether inmates established a connection with a therapy dog.
2. Whether and how inmates' correctional plans were supported through that human-animal bond.
How did inmates experience the connection with the therapy dogs?
Through the animals' perceived offering of love, comfort, and support. Inmates felt "radical acceptance" and unconditional, non-judgmental support from the dogs.
How did the AAT program support inmates' correctional plans?
The human-animal bond increased inmates' recognition of their personal feelings and emotions. This supported their correctional plans, which were situated within a cognitive-behavioral skill development framework.
What specific emotional and behavioral changes were observed in participants?
Emotional: Reduced stress, agitation, sadness, and depression; increased positive affect (e.g., smiling more).
Behavioral: Increased compliance with unit rules and more open communication.
How did the focus of this Canadian study differ from many prison-based animal programs in the U.S.?
While many U.S. programs focus on animal training and community well-being, this study explicitly prioritized and measured inmate mental well-being and therapeutic goals
What were some key limitations of the study?
* Small sample size (n=3).
Selection bias (participants had to like dogs and be non-violent toward animals).
Lead researchers also served as the therapy dog handlers, introducing potential subjective bias