1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Difference between binding precedent and persuasive precedent
1. Binding precedent: previous decision MUST be followed and applied
Persuasive precedent: previous decision is NOT binding but will be considered and MAY be followed
General Agent
appointed by the principal to perform all acts/transactions related to a particular trade or business
Special agent
appointed by principal to perform a particular transaction over a limited period of time
Universal agent
one appointed by powers of attorney and given unlimited powers to act on behalf of the principal and do all acts that the principal can do in their transactions with 3rd parties
duty of an agent
duty to follow the principals instructions
duty to act in person
duty to act in good faith
duty to exercise reasonable care and skill
duty to make full disclosure of any personal interests
duty not to make a secret profit
nature of agents authority
principal is not affected unless principal ratifies unauthorised act
principal may be bound but agent may be liable to principal for breach of agency contract
agent is directly liable for 3rd parties for breach of implied warranty of authority
Ratification
principal may retrospectively confirm acts of an agents that were outside of the agents actual authority
Requirements of ratification
agent must contracgt expressly on behalf of the principal
principal must exist at the time of the contract
principal must have legal capacity to make contract
principal ratifies whole contract
ratification must be within a reasonable period of time and before the performance of the contract
Liabilities of an agent
The principal: where the agent disobeys the principal’s instructions or is negligent and the principal suffers the loss
3rd party where there has been a breach of authority and where the agent doesn’t disclose the existence of any agency
breach of warranty of authority
where the agent doesn’t disclose the existence of any agency
termination of agency
completion of agency (assigned task)
impossibility of performance
agreement between the principal and the agent
bankruptcy of either principal or agent
death or insanity of either principal or agent
revocation of the agents authority by the principal - valid even if it breaches agency contract
contract
an agreement between 2 or more persons under which they acquire rights and obligations which can be enforced in court
Elements of a contract
agreement
intention to create a contract
form or consideration
legal capacity
geniune consent
legality of object
In order to create a deed certain formalities must be met
a deed must be made through a written document
the document must be signed by the promisor
the promisors signature must be attested by at least one witness who also signs the document
deed
a contract under seal is a binding promise to do something which can be enforced against the promisor whether or not the promise has given consideration or not
difference between a contract and a deed
with a contract there must be an exchange of consideration (something of value) between the promisor and promisee whilst there is no requirement for consideration for a deed to be valid
Valid contract
a contract where all essential elements have been met and is legally enforceable in court
void contract
one that was not a contract in the first place. as far as the law is concerned the contract never existed. such contract has no force or effect
voidable contract
a valid contract but one has some kind of flaw that makes it possible for one party to avoid or get out if they wish
Rules of acceptance
must be absolute and unqualified: must be in the exact terms of the offer
acceptance must follow the conditions if any is stated in the offer
acceptance must be made within the time prescribed or if no time has been prescribed within a reasonable time
acceptance must be made in reliance on the offer. only persons who offer was made to and have offer in mind at the point of acceptance
acceptance must be communicated to the offeror for there to be a binding agreement
communication through words, writing or conduct
can’t be inferred from silence or inaction
unless expressly or impied performance of stipualted act will be accpeted
EXCEPTION: POSTAL ACCEPTANCE RULE
acceptance must be communicated
communication by words, writing or conduct (past dealings or reasonable person would infer there has been acceptance)
silence is not acceptance
communication must be in a refular and authorised manner
exceptions to communication
postal acceptance: agreement is concluded when acceptance is posted and not when it’s received
rule will be excluded in situations where the offeror requires actual communication of acceptance (stating “acceptance will be effective upon receipt“
rules for consideration
consideration may be executed or executory but not past
consideration must be sufficient but not needed to be adequate
consideration must move from the promise but not necessarily to the promisor
performance of an existing obligation is not good consideration
Past consideration is not valid
consideration can be executed or executory but not past
excpetion to Past consideration is not valid
past consideration can be good if the act was
rendered at the request of the promiser
understanding that the act would be remunerated
promise had been made before the act in question
consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate
consideration must have some value in the eyes of the law BUT it doesn’t necessarily have to be equal to what other party gives
consideration must move from promise but not necessarily to the promiser
only persons who have provided consideration can enforce a promiSE (doctrine of privity) however a person can provide consideration for a contract that would benefit a 3rd party
performance of an existing legal duty is not good consideration
there is no consideration if all that the promiser does is no more than what they are already obliged to do/not do