1/49
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Random sampling
When everyone in the target population has an equal chance being selected as a ppt
Systematic sampling
Selecting every nth person in the target population
Opportunity sampling
Research takes the opportunity to take anyone to be available at the time of the study
Volunteer sampling
Ppl in target population select themselves to be ppts
Stratified sampling
The ratio of the target population of categories then same ratio for sample (pie chart one)
Advantages of repeated measures
no ppt variables
Only need half as many ppts as other experimental designs
Disadvantage of repeated measures
order effects (practicing) so can’t use same stimulus material E.g. same crossword puzzle
What’s counterbalancing
Half the participants do condition A then B, and the other half do B then A. Each participant experiences all conditions in a forward and reverse order.
Advantages of independent groups
Use exactly same stimulus material in the two condition
Demand characteristics, practice effects and order effects less likely
Disadvantage of independent groups
Participant variables
Advantages of matched pairs design
no ppt variables
Use the same stimulus material
Disadvantage of matched pairs
Very time consuming to match ppt on variables, especially multiple variables
What makes an experiment reliable
If the same results can be given time after time
Difference between single and double blind control
Single blind control is when the ppt is told there is a fake aim of the study, double blind is when the investigator is not told of the aim so they can’t bias their behaviour
Advantages of lab
highly controlled variables
High in internal validity
Disadvantages of lab experiments
lower ecological validity
Risk of demand characteristics
Advantages of field
high ecogological validity
No risk of demand demand characteristic
Disadvantages of field
harder to replicate as less controlled
Lower in internal validity
Difference between natural and field experiment
Field purposefully manipulates the IV, natural has the IV naturally occurring
Advantages of natural
high ecological validity
No risk of demand characteristics
Disadvantages of natural
low internal validity
Impossible to replicate
What is a quasi experiment
Naturally occurring IV, DV can be measured in a lab
E.g. studying men and women in lab
Advantage of quasi
high ecological validity
Disadvantages of quasi
Can’t randomly allocate so other participant variables may be acting
Low ecological validity so hard to establish cause and effect
Acronym for ethical considerations
Can Do Can’t Do With Participants
C - Consent (informed)
D - Deception
C - confidentiality
D - Debrief (at end)
W - Withdrawal (right to)
P - Protection from harm
Advantage of correlation
Let’s us make predictions
Disadvantage of correlation
Doesn’t imply causation
Participant vs non-participant observation
Non-participant is when the researcher does not take part in the experiment, participant is when they do
Covert vs over experiment
Covert is when the ppts don’t know they’re being studied (informed consent issues - however if in public presumptive consent)
Overt is when they do know (validity issues)
Difference between naturalistic and controlled observations
Naturalistic observations record spontaneous behavior in real-world settings without interference. Controlled observations occur in structured environments (like a lab), where researchers manipulate variables and standardize procedures to isolate specific behaviors
Difference between time sampling and event sampling
Time sampling is recording behaviour for a fixed period of time at specific intervals
Event sampling is recording a complete event which is believed to be important each time it occurs
How to perform an observation
Decide what to observe
Choose behaviour categories
Carry out observation with either time or event sampling
Quantify data
Advantages of naturalistic observation
High ecological validity
Useful when behaviour cannot be recreated in a lab
Disadvantages of naturalistic observation
little to no control of variables so cause and effect cannot be inferred
May be observer bias
Advantages of controlled observations
easily replicated
Less time consuming than naturalistic as data is quantitative
Disadvantages of controlled observation
observer bias
Low ecological validity
Advantages of case studies
provides rich data about specific issue
Sometimes is the only method available to use
Disadvantages of case studies
difficult to generalise
Not replicable
What is a content analysis
Converting content into an objective measure
How to perform content analysis
Decide what content to analyse
Decide coding units
Carry it out
Quantify it
Advantages of content analysis
no demand characteristics
High ecological validity
Disadvantage of content analysis
researcher interprets things differently (investigator effect)
What are the two self report techniques
Questionnaires and interviews
Advantages of questionnaires
versatility
Can produce a larger amount of info and easy to analyse (quantify)
Disadvantages of questionnaires
social desirability bias
Structured = lack of freedom, unstructured = difficult to analyse
Advantages of interviews
used to explore complex issues
Allows researchers to gain subjective meaning
Disadvantages of interviews
interviewees may struggle to put thoughts into words
Appearance and behaviour of interviewer may effect interviewee

If a normal distribution curve is positively skewed this means its too difficult or too easy?
Too difficult
If a normal distribution curve is negatively skewed this means its too difficult or too easy?
Too easy
What does nominal mean