1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
International Allocation
The allocation of sovereignty from the state to either regional or global institutions
Thought that it is facilitated by new forms of information and communication technologies (ICTs), which in turn promote the growth of supranational relationships and identities
Drivers of International Allocation
Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and Globalization
Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs)
Greater access to information increases state and non-state actors' power both domestically and internationally
Governments (state actors) may use the dissemination of information across borders as a means of influencing other states as well as non-state actors
Greater + freer flow of information around the world can undermine the authority and power of governments
Economic benefits can be generated that rely less on government (e.g., mobile money transfers and banking, education, etc.)
Globalization
Refers to the increasing level of human interaction across both national borders and the world, which results in myriad new economic, political, technological, intellectual and cultural developments; an economic process with political consequences
Has both negative (e.g., criminal networks, counterfeit products) and positive (e.g., transnational advocacy networks) impacts on society
Economic Globalization
The reduction of barriers to trade, such as tariffs and quotas, which is entailed by the expansion of free trade blocs and zones, and bilateral and multilateral trade agreements
Enables capital to become increasingly unfettered and unregulated in its movements both within and among domestic markets
Pro-Globalizers
Also known as “deregulators” and “internationalists”
Job creation and economic growth by reducing barriers to capital, increasing consumer choice through competition and innovation, socio-cultural exchanges to decrease xenophobia and promote decidedly “Western” conceptions of democracy and human rights (e.g., economic liberals)
Anti-Globalizers
Also known as “skeptics” and “reversers”
Tend to believe that globalization is eroding democratic governance
Globalization increases inequalities and various forms of injustice
It may lead to a single-world culture, dominated by the US as a form of cultural imperialism
Global Governance
Refers to efforts or initiatives that aim to solve, in a collective manner by state and non-state actors - transnational issue-areas or problems
Not a single institution, but the networks and linkages that bring together different organizations, interest groups, and forms of authority in relation to specific regulatory tasks
Initiatives often seek to provide a global collective good (i.e, something that unfettered markets cannot deliver, such as conflict-free diamonds)
Supranational
The subordination of state authority or national identity to larger institutions and groupings
International Integration
The process by which supranational institutions comes to replace national ones; the gradual shifting upward of sovereignty from the state to regional or global structures
Regionalism
Expression of a common sense of identity and purpose combined with the creation and implementation of institutions that express a particular identity and shape collective action within a geographical region
Integration Theories
Functionalism, Neofunctionalism, Intergovernmentalism
Functionalism
Key theorists - Émile Durkheim, Talcott Parsons
Holds that social and political phenomena can be explained by their function within a larger whole - for regional integration, it seeks to explain why regionalism has functional advantages over state independence
Neofunctionalism
Key theorists - Jean Monnet, Ernst B. Haas
Holds that economic integration (functionalism) generates a “spillover” effect, resulting in increased political integration
Intergovernmentalism
Key theorists - Stanley Hoffman, Andrew Moravcsik
Characterized by state centrism, argues that European integration is driven by the interests and actions of states