First Amendment Freedoms

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/33

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 12:35 AM on 4/17/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

34 Terms

1
New cards

The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees

the equal protection of the laws and due process of law.

2
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines

Students were suspended for wearing black armbands as a symbol of protest against the Vietnam War. The Supreme Court ruled it a violation of the students' First Amendment rights. Heard by Supreme Court in 1969.

3
New cards

Bethel v. Fraser opinion

Student speech may be limited when speech is lewd or sexually explicit and the audience includes children.

4
New cards

First Amendment rights of students are not automatically...

coextensive (the same) with the rights of adults.

5
New cards

Administrators may suppress freedom of expression when

They view student behavior/speech will cause a "material and substantial disruption". The limitations were established in Tinker v. Des Moines.

6
New cards

Morse v. Frederick

Schools can suppress speech that promotes drug use. Student held "Bong Hits for Jesus" banner as class watched Olympic torch parade by. Supreme Court ruled in 2007.

7
New cards

Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier opinion

Administrators can regulate content of school-sponsored publications and plays that students, parents, and the public might reasonably perceive to bear the approval of the school. Iowa passed a state law making "Tinker" the standard

8
New cards

Schools can prohibit students from publishing and distributing material that:

is obscene, contains profanity, is slanderous or libelous, violates the rights of privacy, advocates breaking the law, would cause disruption of the orderly operation of the school.

9
New cards

Bethel v. Fraser background

Matthew Fraser, after being advised not to, gave a speech in front of 600 students at a school assembly during student council elections. The speech contained significant sexual innuendo. He was subsequently suspended.

10
New cards

Brandenburg v. Ohio 1969

Government can only forbid "imminent lawless action" speech. This is the test for what speech can be suppressed in the United States. 1969 case that involved a leader of the KKK. This is the test which is currently used to define what speech is protected.

11
New cards

Anti-Hazelwood laws

Laws passed in Iowa and a five other states in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. The state laws effectively made "Tinker" the standard for student expression instead of the limits established by the Hazelwood decision.

12
New cards

In Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier case, what were the two offending articles about

Divorce and teen pregnancy

13
New cards

In the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier case, why weren't the students given a chance to edit or change the articles?

There was no time. The paper had to be published that day or not at all. Consequently, the pages that contained the two articles were removed. The Hazelwood East students claimed their First Amendment rights were violated.

14
New cards

Incorporation

Process in which the Supreme Court has ruled that amendments in the Bill of Rights apply to the state governments also - not just the federal government,

15
New cards

Amendment used to incorporate Bill of Rights

14th Amendment

16
New cards

Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

A cheerleader in Mahanoy Area High School in Pennsylvania sent an off-campus snapchat that was deemed to have violated team and school rules, and she was suspended from jv cheer for a year. The 3rd Circuit ruled it violated her 1st Amendment rights. The Supreme Court agreed due to the precedent established in Tinker v. Des Moines

17
New cards

Defamatory Speech

False speech that damages a person's good name, character, or reputation. Slander is verbal defamation, while libel is written defamation

18
New cards

Pure Speech

Most common form of speech, relies only on power of words

19
New cards

Symbolic Speech

Type of speech using actions and symbols in addition to words

20
New cards

4 tests for speech

1. clear and present danger

2. bad tendency doctrine

3. preferred position doctrine

4. imminent lawless action

21
New cards

Preferred position doctrine

First amendment freedoms are more fundamental than other freedoms because they provide a basis of all liberties. Supreme Court case Murdock v. Pennsylvania involving Jehovah's Witnesses going door to door and the town requiring them to register and pay small fee.

22
New cards

Bad Tendency

A Supreme Court test for the freedom of speech developed in the 1920's that allowed the government more leeway to restrict speech

23
New cards

What is not protected?

Fighting words, threats, defamatory speech, speech that will cause imminent, lawless action

24
New cards

Abridging the freedom of speech

Limiting or reducing the freedom of speech

25
New cards

sedition

rebellion or resistance against the government

26
New cards

Yates v. United States

Communists convictions overturned saying speech that advocates for belief in the "idea" is protected speech as long as it doesn't lead to immediate danger.

27
New cards

Schenck v. United States

A socialist's speech urging drafted men to not report during WWI was not protected. Government can limit speech if the speech provokes a "clear and present danger" of substantive evils.

28
New cards

United States v. O'Brien (1968)

Burning a draft card is not protected. Court ruled symbolic speech can be limited if government agency has the power, the ban is narrow and allows for other opportunities to express the speech. Symbolic speech test case

29
New cards

Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)

speech that does not call for illegal action is protected, and even speech that does call for illegal action is protected if the action is not "imminent" or there is reason to believe that the listeners will not take action

30
New cards

Texas v. Johnson

First Amendment/Freedom of Speech/symbolic speech - flag burning is protected speech

31
New cards

Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)

The Court ruled that the first amendment did not protect "fighting words."

32
New cards

R.A.V. v. St. Paul (1992)

Reversed the conviction of a teenager burning a cross on the lawn of an African-American family since the ordinance was held to violate the First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech.

33
New cards

Gitlow v. New York

a socialist violated a New York criminal anarchy statute. Benjamin Gitlow distributed a pamphlet calling for mass insurrection and overthrow of the U.S. capitalist system. Using the bad tendency test, the Supreme Court upheld the statute and the conviction.

34
New cards

Still learning (33)

You've started learning these terms. Keep it up!