1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Definition: Personality
Personality = stable pattern of Affect, Behavior, and Cognition
Various historical & contemporary perspectives:
Temperament approaches
Psychodynamic approaches
Learning approaches
Humanistic approaches
Biological approaches
Trait approaches
Temperament approaches
-Hippocrates
-Galen
-Inmanuel Kant
-Wilhelm Wundt
Hippocrates
Temperament
Theorized that personality traits and human behaviors are based on four separate temperaments associated with four fluids (“humors”) of the body.
4 temperaments influenced by 4 humors (fluids) in body to explain personality
Choleric– yellow bile from liver
Melancholic– black bile from kidneys
Sanguine (optimistic/– red blood from heart
Phlegmatic – white phlegm from lungs
Galen
Temperament
Believed both diseases and personality differences could be explained by imbalances in the humors and that each person exhibits one of the four temperaments.
Extended Hippocratic view; focus on imbalances of humors (for disease and personality)… popular for around 1000 years
Choleric = passionate, ambitious, bold
Melancholic = reserved,, anxious, unhappy
Sanguine = joyful, eager, optimistic
Phlegmatic = calm, reliable, thoughtful
Immanuel Kant
Temperament
Added lists of traits to describe each of the 4 temperaments
•Very ”black and white” approach… there’s no overlap between the 4 “types”
Wilhelm Wundt
Temperament
Suggested 2 axes of temperaments:
1. Emotional/Non-emotional
2. Changeable/Unchangeable
Emotional/non-emotional
separated strong emotions (melancholic, choleric) from the weak emotions (phlegmatic, sanguine).
Changeable/unchangeable
divided the changeable temperaments (choleric, sanguine) from the unchangeable ones (melancholic, phlegmatic).
Frans Gall
•Proposed relationship between skull bumps & areas with personality = phrenology
•Developed chart mapping skull areas with traits & characteristics
•However, lack of empirical support (pseudoscience)
PSYCHODYNAMICS
•Common emphasis on the unconscious as well as childhood experiences
Freud (1900s)
Neo-Freudians (Adler, Jung, Horney, Erikson)
Freud
psychodynamics
•First comprehensive personality theory
•Main idea: unconscious drives & childhood experiences; emphasis on sex & aggression
Neo-Freudians
psychodynamics
•Adler, Jung, Horney, Erikson
•Agree on importance of childhood experiences
•Still focus on unconscious
•Less emphasis on sex; more emphasis on social environment & culture
Freud’s Personality Theory
•We are only aware of a small amount (about one-tenth) of our mind’s activities and most of it remains hidden from us in our unconscious.
•Unacceptable urges and desires are kept in our unconscious through repression.
•The information in our unconscious affects our behavior, although we are unaware of it.
•Mind consists of 3 layers
Conscious
Preconscious
Unconscious = unaware & unable to access; stores unacceptable urges & desires; impacts our behavior
-Freudian slip
Freudian Slip
•when you say something you didn’t mean to (esp. sexual or aggressive in nature)… but, you only ”didn’t mean to” because it represents an ”unacceptable” thought or urge
Idea – it slipped out of your unconscious
Dowd note: The best way (only way) to analyze Freudian slips is via self-acceptance and self-knowledge.
In OCD treatment, for instance, it’s really important to understand the difference between ego-dystonic and ego-syntonic thoughts, behaviors, feelings, etc.
Both of these terms also come from Freud
Id
- Contains primitive urges (for hunger, thirst, and sex).; Impulsive, instinctual.; Operates on the “pleasure principle” – seeks immediate gratification.
•Primitive urges
Unhealthy Dominant id= Narcissistic and Impulsive; maybe psychopath if no
Ego
reality principle = helps id satisfy desires in a realistic way
seeks balance
Navigates conflict between id & superego
”reality principle”
Observable by others
HEALTHY” personality = good balance of 2 other forces. If no healthy balance, neurosis (negative emotions)
Superego
develops through interactions with others & learning right vs wrong (conscience)
•seeks control
•Socialized; ”right vs wrong”
•“morality principle”
•Too strong superego = controlled by guilt, fails to experience pleasure
Neurosis
•anxiety, or, not experienced at all thanks to depression/psychopathy/narcissism) = ego’s inability to maintain balance
defense mechanisms
•Ego’s attempts to navigate conflict (get rid of anxiety) = may result in defense mechanisms
•Unconscious protective behaviors to reduce anxiety
•Goal: restore balance between id & superego
•Freud: everyone uses them sometimes; overuse is problematic
Mixed empirical support
Denial
refusal to accept real events because they are unpleasant
EX: refusing to admit one has a vaping problem
Displacement
transferring inappropriate urges/behaviors to a more acceptable or less threatening target
EX: mad at one’s boss so instead kicking one’s dog
Projection
attributing unacceptable desires to others
EX: someone cheats on their partner & suspects partner is cheating on them
Rationalization
justifying behaviors by substituting acceptable reasons for less-acceptable reasons
EX: “I didn’t fail test because I didn’t study – the test itself was bogus”
Reaction formation
reducing anxiety by adopting beliefs contrary to your actual beliefs or feelings
EX: angry at a person for always being late, but instead you act overly nice to them and even say they shouldn’t be in a rush, “take your time”
Regression
returning to coping strategies for less mature stages of development
EX: after failing an exam, rather than working harder, reverting back to just binging cartoons
Repression
suppressing painful memories and thoughts – and UNABLE to even access them (ex: in trauma)
Sublimation
redirecting unacceptable desires through socially acceptable channels
EX: rather than seek revenge for someone who died by drunk driving accident, instead starting a support group