1/85
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Technological advances
increasingly necessary for meeting many human needs
not necessarily bad
useful, efficient & revolutionary
Costs of technology
stress & wellbeing
bodily dysregulation
motivation & addiction
misuse & abuse
confusion & uncertainty
polarization
Cyberpsychology
discipline of understanding psychological processes related to, & underlying, all aspects & features of technologically interconnected human behavior
Machine & Mind
series of systems, each with independent functions that operate together to perform task(s)
Critical quality of brain
constantly receives & uses info in environment to adjust behavior
typically not seen in machines
Machine Learning
not inherently a bad thing, but utility depends on goal & task
Media & attracting attention
time is MONEY, especially for free subscription services
time exposed to ads
amount of highly useful data compiled
Thiune Brain Theory
brain is organized into hierarchy of evolutionary developement
low level: auto, emo, guttural
high level: thoughtful, rational, planning
Implications of Thiune Brain Theory
species evolve linearly, & humans are at the end of the line
reptiles don’t have the more evolved human parts of the brain
impulsive behaviors = lizard brain, otherwise it’s our more evolved human brain
dual process models of cognition
Dual Process Models
hot regulates cold, dominates many areas of psychology
implicit vs explicit attitudes
affective vs cognitive
subconscious vs conscious
associative vs propositional memory & conditioning
fast vs slow processing
Empirical Work for Dual Process Models
when shut down explicit/slow/conscious process
implicit/automatic processes affect attitude & behavior
limit time vs give ample time
cognitive load vs low effort
Usefulness of Dual Process Models
very useful heuristic for understanding many aspects of human psychology
Nuance of Dual Process Models
processes are not mutuall exclusive
multiple dimension simultaneously
both controlled & automatic features
Brain organization
vertical spectrum along neuroaxis
brain stem
diencephalon (thalamus & hypothalamus)
limbic structures (hippocampus, amygdala & basal ganglia)
cerebral cortex
Features lower down on neuroaxis
more directly wired to bodily systems
cranial & spinal nerves leaving brain stem
highly structured at brith & generally lacking in plasticity
critically involved in neurochemical production
adjusts higher brain regions & bodily functions
Features higher up on neuroaxis
indirectly wired to bodily systems
connect via brainstem & lower regions (except smell)
relatively unstructured at birth & highly plastic
implicated in conscious/effortful processing
Dynamic & connected systems
info constantly updated up & down neuroaxis to coordinate & organize appropriate responses
optimal, flexible interaction between auto & conscious control
balance/interaction can get dysregulated
Why we doomscroll late at night
auto desires for stimulation arise, more conscious, controllable processes fail to override
having conscious, deliberate thoughts about planning day, work etc. that override auto desires for sleep
Circadian Rhythm
the physical, mental & behavioral changes an organism experiences over a 24-hour cycle
modulated by brain structure lower down neuroaxis
Blue light & Circadian Rhythm
exposure ot light (especially blue light) impacts melatonin production
disruptive at night when melatonin peaks
most common source are screens
blue light not inherently bad, but timing of exposure matters
Blue light in evening
melatonin suppression
shorter sleep duration
poorer sleep quality
Day after evening with blue light exposure
slower reaction times
daytime sleepiness
Shortened &/or poor quality sleep
havoc all over the neuroaxis
working memory & cognitive performance
academic performance
cognitive biases & attention
risk-taking
depression & anxiety
high perceived stress
Cyclical effect (using phone at night)
smartphone use
impacts automatic sleep-wake cycle
impacts stress, focus & depression
more smartphone use
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
various models, but largely holds today
physiological & psychological needs
biggest critique: order of hierarchy is culturally limited
often our goals may serve multiple needs/goals OR conflict with one another
Goal pursuit
goals help ensure need fulfillment
systems in place to keep track of meeting goals
Progress/completion of goals
positive affective & cognitive outcomes
accomplishment
pride
content
satiation
Falling short/fear of not meeting goals
negative affective & cognitive outcomes
dejection
disappointment
unease
irritability
Goal pursuit regulated by dopamine
reward cues → phasic, active finding of dopamine
failure cues → depression of dopamine
Expectancy Value Framework
intentionally set goals that are high in success expectation & value
but might not be the whole story
Unconscious goal pursuit
goals can arise & operate automatically
we have chronic but not always accessible goals
we hold learned associations between goals & environmental/situational cues
cue present/accessible (whether consciously or not) → activate associated goals
goals → behavior
Psychological associations with money
money → independence & self-reliance goals → impart behavior
reduced requests for help & helping towards others
placed more physical distance between self & others
decreased feelings of personal connection to others
Strength of cue-behavior association depends on
how worthwhile is goal-pursuit?
how strong is association between cue & goal? (practised, rehearsed, habitual)
both learned through prior experience
Extremely effective behavioral cue
present in many different contexts
high reward utility
likely to lead to many successful goal outcomes
Phone as constant unconscious goal prime
gateway for all kinds of goals
mobilizing mobile phone for goal pursuit → high utility
grabs our attention → repeated/chronic use → enhance learning of associations
Learning
relatively permanent change in knowledge/behavior that results from experience
Conditioning
learning by association
2 things “go together”
co-occur repeatedly
different from unconscious goal pursuit
Classical conditioning
type of learning that occurs when a neutral stimulus produces a response/reflec after being paired with stimulus that naturally produces the response
How to classical condition
pair neutral stimulus with unconditioned stimulus
after repeating, eventually the neutral stimulus invokes a conditioned response
Operant conditioning
behavior → approaching incentives, moving away from punishment
behavior more likely to be repeated with favorable consequences
Positive reinforcement
increases behavior by presenting pleasurable stimulus
social rewards
validation
connection
Negative reinforcement
increases behavior by removing an aversive (unpleasant stimulus)
Schedules of reinforcement
patterns of how reinforcers are presented over time
influence how rapidly oragnism learn behavior/how resistant behavior is to extinction
Continuous schedules
reinforcement occurs with every response
Partial schedules
reinforcements happen part of the time
fixed
variable
Fixed schedule
reinforcement provided after a fixed number of responses/set time
Variable schedules
reinforcement provded after a varying amount of responses/set time
Which schedule of reinforcement is more effective
variable schedules
tend to generate higher response rates & greater resistance to extinction
unpredictability = every time COULD bring rewards
Goal pursuit interruption
we don’t like when goal pursuit is interrupted
adaptive and helpful
Apps and goal pursuit interruption
endless scrolling/streaming promotes fluid & enjoyable experience
purposefully interrupt goal pursuit e.g. sell you something to continue
Stress
a state of mental/emotional strain/tension/effort resulting from demanding circumstances
does not have to be intense or life-altering
Stressor categories of this generation
similar to those of prev generations, but differ in scope & nature
career prospects & AI
rising costs
online relationships
largely psychological rather than physical
What we do when stressed
seek comfort
take break from stressors
one place to go to: smartphone
Security with smartphone
immediate source of comfort & retreat from stress
especially for young people
#1 reason for pulling out smart phone: relaxation/escapism
up to 99% students have at leat moderate levels of “nomophobia”: fear of being detached from mobile phone connectivity
Greater stress and phones
phone check frequency → greater depression, stress, anxiety
millenials most likely to attribute stress to smartphone/device
Melumad et al. study 1
participants viewed smartphone as source of comfort
stronger than PC
portability, privacy, personal, haptic qualities
enjoyment & entertainment → more comfort
younger → more comfort
Melumad et al. study 2
high stress condition: write speech about why they’d be perfect candidate for job, and later recite speech by memo + visible camera
low stress condition: write advice for someone who was applying for job, no reciting & no visible camera present
participant left to be filmed for 10 min
Melumad et al. study 2 results
high stress
more likely to use phone
quicker to use phone
spent more time on phone
Concerns for Melumad et al. study 2
due to nature of high stress task, participants could have been using phone to prepare for the speech rather than just seeking comfort
Melumad et al. study 3
measure comfort before stressor, after stressor, & after manipulation task
manipulation task: use phone or laptop to view Tumblr page
Melumad et al. study 3 results
all participants felt better after manipulation task
starker increase for those in smartphone condition
may also be due to stressful associations with laptops
Melumad et al. study 4
apply stressor before manipulation task
view tumblr page on own smartphone/lab’s smartphone
measure comfort before stressor, after stressor, & after manipulation task
Melumad et al. study 4 results
increase in comfort from time 2 to time 3
but moreso for own device than when using lab’s device
but there could also be paranoia discomfort surrounding lab’s smartphone
What makes something stressful
perceived importance & self-relevance
uncertainty & unpredictability
Active coping
awareness of stressor, followed by attempts to reduce impact/scope
problem-focused
emotion-focused
Problem-focused coping
attacking stressor directly
Emotion-focused coping
reframing emotional response & instilling skills to manage stressors
Avoidance coping
changes in behavior to avoid thinking about/feeling/doing things related to stressor
What’s wrong with avoidance coping?
evading/delaying stressor exacerbates/extends stress, without helping resolve issue/reframe response
greater work[place burnout
lower self-esteem
anxious & depressive symptoms
Hoolahan et al.
10-year longitudinal study of 1211 late-middle-aged people
avoidance coping style → more incidences of stressors → future depressive symptoms
range of negative life events from acute to chronic
Resilience
adapted ability to manage well in face of stressors
cope productively with stressors
performing well in difficult/new/uncertain situations
emotional stability in times of stress
developed through experiences with stressors
Previous resilience theory
more adversity → more adverse
linear relationship
Seery et al. on resilience
some adversity → greater resilience
exposure to moderate & manageable amount of lifetime stressors
more positive responses to ongoing & future stressors
Damage to aMCC
associated with
motivational impairment
apathy
inability to plan for long-term goals
aMCC & mental/physical health
bigger aMCC/stronger connectivity predicts
less apathetic symptoms of depression
greater cognitive performance in old age
greater exercise capacity
healthier food choices
stronger academic performance
grit, persistence, willingness to exert effort
Phones giving comfort & stress
short-term benefit: reprieve from stressor
long-term consequences: avoidance coping, stifling resilience & tenacity
Panova & Lleras
internet & mobile use → greater depression & anxiety
but only when people used it to avoid negative experiences/feelings
using for boredom reduction = little association
Pew Research survey on internet use
worn out by amount of news/info they encounter
worn out by political posts & discussions seen on social media
stressful & frustrating to talk about substantiative policy issues on social media
Self-esteem
overall self-evaluation
affective: not necessarily conscious, but emotional gut feeling
Self-discrepancy theory
feelings about self affected by how we see possible, hypothetical selves
how close is actual self to positive hypothetical selves
Bringing discrepancies to mind
when we fail or feel we could fail at something (especially for important domains)
situations that heighten self-awareness
Self-awareness trap
constant comparisons fo current self to high personal standards/desirable hypothetical selves
the more examination, the more discrepancy we might see
chronically heightened focus on self → negatively impacts self-esteem
Narcissism
exagerrated feelings of grandiosity, vanity, self-absorption &/or entitlement
self-focused attention in hyperdrive
Grandiose/overt narcissism
more prototypical form
external expressions of entitlement/superiority
Vulnerable/covert narcissism
self-absorbed neuroticism
need for recognition & praise
hypersensitive to feedback
Narcissism & social media
high in narcissism (especially overt) → more likely to carefully monitor & construct favorable online personas