Stability of Weimar democracy 1924-29

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/20

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:17 PM on 4/7/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

21 Terms

1
New cards

Evidence of stability (6)

-Stresemann continues as Foreign minister

-No attempted coups from Left or Right

-No major political figures were assassinated

-Democratic parties increased their vote in 1928

-More votes for main democratic parties in 1924 than 1920

-Extremist parties didnt gain mass support

2
New cards

What is

-Stresemann continues as Foreign minister

-No attempted coups from Left or Right

-No major political figures were assassinated

-Democratic parties increased their vote in 1928

-More votes for main democratic parties in 1924 than 1920

-Extremist parties didnt gain mass support

Evidence of instability

3
New cards

How did Stresemann being foreign minister help Weimar’s stability?

Meant continuity in diplomatic policies that benefitted Weimar

4
New cards

2 lack of political violence that shows stability in Weimar’s 1924-29

-No attempted coups from Left or Right

-No major political figures were assassinated

5
New cards

Weimar voting 1924-29 that shows stability

-Extremist parties didnt gain mass support

-More votes for main democratic parties in 1924 than 1920

6
New cards

Evidence for instability due to political system (4)

-Growth of narrow sectional interest encouraged by PR eg: Reich party for People’s Rights + revaluation

→ reduces chance for broad compromise

-Voters in the 35 electoral regions vote for party, not deputy so dont get to choose

-6 short lived coalitions 1924-29, most didnt have a secure majority in Reichstag

-Need for constant bargaining to stay in power discredited gov

7
New cards

3 causes of instability

-Political system

-Poor leadership

-Influence of CONS elites

8
New cards

What is

-Political system

-Poor leadership

-Influence of CONS elites

3 causes of instability

9
New cards

What is

-Growth of narrow sectional interest encouraged by PR eg: Reich party for People’s Rights + revaluation

→ reduces chance for broad compromise

-Voters in the 35 electoral regions vote for party, not deputy so dont get to choose

-6 short lived coalitions 1924-29, most didnt have a secure majority in Reichstag

-Need for constant bargaining to stay in power discredited gov

Evidence of instability due to political system

10
New cards

How many govs 1924-29?

6 short lived coalitions

11
New cards

Problem with voting for deputies

Voters in the 25 electoral regions voted for parties, not deputies so didnt get to choose

12
New cards

How did growth of narrow sectional interest parties effect Weimar?

Made it difficult for the broad compromise needed for a democratic government

Eg: Reich party for people’s rights + revaluation - compensation for losers of hyperinflation

13
New cards

Evidence of instability due to poor leadership (4)

-Parties often divided amongst themselves

-On any issue, the moderate left (SPD) + moderate right (DVP) might join forces w/ radicals to defeat gov policy

-Politicians in coalitions couldn’t cooperate

-Weimar lacked a charismatic leader

14
New cards

What is

-Parties often divided amongst themselves

-On any issue, the moderate left (SPD) + moderate right (DVP) might join forces w/ radicals to defeat gov policy

-Politicians in coalitions couldn’t cooperate

-Weimar lacked a charismatic leader

Evidence of instability due to poor leadership

15
New cards

What might moderate left (SPD) or moderate right (DVP) do to defeat gov policy?

Join up with radicals

16
New cards

What did Weimar lack?

A charismatic leader

17
New cards

Evidence of instability due to influence of CONS elite (3)

-Many industrialists resented what they saw as growing burdens of the welfare state + tried to reassert greater control of wages

-Centre right moved to the right in the late 20s, some leaders like Bruning began to favour more authoritarian

-Many employees of the state retained distaste for democracy eg: judged + civil servants + army full of generals who wanted a more authoritarian state

18
New cards

What is

-Many industrialists resented what they saw as growing burdens of the welfare state + tried to reassert greater control of wages

-Centre right moved to the right in the late 20s, some leaders like Bruning began to favour more authoritarian

-Many employees of the state retained distaste for democracy eg: judged + civil servants + army full of generals who wanted a more authoritarian state

Evidence of instability due to CONS elite

19
New cards

What happened to centre right in the 1920s?

Moved to right + some leaders like Bruning began to favour more authoritarian leaderships

20
New cards

Why did many industrialists resent Weimar?

Saw it as growing burdens of a welfare state + tried to reassert greater control of wages

21
New cards

Who retained distaste for democracy?

Many employees of the state such as judges + civil servants