1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Push and pull factors
push: conditions forcing people to leave (war, poverty, instability like the Opium Wars in China)
pull: attractions drawing people in (jobs, gold rush, railroad work in the U.S.) Chinese migration was not random—it was structured by global capitalism and labor demand
Chinese Exclusion Act
The first U.S. law to explicitly ban immigration based on race and nationality
Suspended Chinese labor immigration and denied naturalization
Created systems of state surveillance: Identification papers (early immigration documentation), Detention centers
Marked a shift toward federal control over immigration
Bigger meaning: This law institutionalized the idea that race determines belonging, shaping future immigration policy.
Johnson-Reed Immigration Act
Established strict national origin quotas favoring Northern/Western Europeans
Effectively banned Asian immigration (Asiatic Barred Zone)
Its main objective was to preserve American homogeneity by severely restricting immigration from Southern/Eastern Europe and totally excluding Asian immigrant
Rooted in eugenics (belief in racial hierarchy)
Bigger meaning: It turned racism into formal population engineering—deciding who should make up America.
Legal Construction of Whiteness
The Naturalization Act of 1790 limited citizenship to “free white persons.” After the Civil War, this was expanded to include people of African descent. There were a lot of people coming from places that did not fit either category.
From 1878 to 1972, the ban on people from Asia and the new laws of naturalization led to over 50 federal court cases between 1878 and 1952 on behalf of “non-white” immigrants suing for the right to naturalize
Part of their claim to naturalization is that they should be defined as white and should therefore be able to naturalize as citizens of the United States.
Courts had to define what “white” meant
Result: race was revealed as inconsistent, flexible, and political—not biological
Ozawa v. United States
A Japanese immigrant argued he should be considered white because of his light skin and assimilation
Court ruled: Whiteness = “Caucasian” (scientific definition)
Speaks to the arbitraryness of who gets to be classified as white, both rise to the level of the Supreme Court and reflect the messy thinking of justices
Key insight: Race was framed as scientific, but this standard didn’t hold consistently.
United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind
He is literally of the same racial group as the people from the Caucasus mountains who historically moved there from India
He is technically caucasian and descends from this group
Court rejected him, saying: Whiteness = “common sense” understanding of white people
Key insight: The Court contradicted itself, proving race is socially constructed.
Sovereignty
The right of Native nations to govern themselves independently
Includes:
Legal systems
Land ownership
Cultural autonomy
U.S. policy repeatedly undermined sovereignty to expand territory and industry
Chicago World’s Columbian Exposition
Showcased the U.S. as a global economic power
Promoted the idea that the frontier shaped American identity
Suggested westward expansion created a unique, democratic, self-reliant culture
Framed the frontier as a “safety valve” that reduced social conflict and overcrowding
Homestead Act
Under the homestead act, anyone over 21 could claim 160 acres of public free land and were required to pay a public filing fee, and live on the land for 5 years and improved the land by raising livestock, building a home, growing crops, after 5 years if they showed that they improved the land they would receive a deed to that land.
Promoted westward expansion and settlement
Helped some individuals escape poverty
BUT: Benefited corporations (railroads) and speculators. Ignored that land belonged to Native Americans
Buffalo extermination
Buffalo population dropped from ~50 million to ~200 by 1889
U.S. policy encouraged killing buffalo
Purpose: Destroy Native Americans’ main food source and economy and make the land unlivable, forcing relocation
Treaty of Fort Laramie
Granted Sioux control of Black Hills
Promised land access “as long as buffalo roam”
Required:
Native Americans → hand over criminals to U.S.
U.S. → regulate settlers
Crow Dog and “Chief” Spotted Tail
Spotted Tail, oversaw Soo nation and was working with the U.S
Crow Dog took his life, Crime was a soo person against Soo person
Happened under Soo jurisdiction, settled through restitution, order to give spotted tails family a sum of money, justice should have been restored, but then the U.S intervened against their preferred public leader
Arrested crow dog in territorial court and sentenced him to death
The court's ruling angered the executive branch
2 years later congress passed the major crimes act
Major Crimes Act
Gave the federal government authority over major crimes on reservations
Overrode tribal justice systems
Bigger meaning:
Reduced Native sovereignty
Expanded federal control into tribal life
expanded federal jurisdiction over crimes in Indian Country
Jim Crow as a “Spatial Project”
Segregation wasn’t just social—it was geographic and enforced through space
Determined:
Where people could live
Work
Travel
Maintained racial hierarchy through physical separation
Powell v. Alabama
Established that defendants must have access to legal counsel
Based on Scottsboro Boys case
Bigger meaning: First step in weakening Jim Crow legal practices
De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation
De jure = segregation enforced by law
De facto = segregation that appears “natural” but is actually produced by policy
According to Richard Rothstein:
De facto segregation is not accidental—it is the result of hidden government action
The Scottsboro Cases
he Scottsboro Boys case refers to a series of trials involving nine Black teenage boys falsely accused of raping two white women on a train in Alabama.
Shelley v. Kraemer
Ruled that courts cannot enforce racial housing covenants
Did not eliminate segregation, but weakened legal enforcement
Brown v. Board of Education
Declared that racial segregation in public schools is unconstitutional
Overturned “separate but equal”
Key reasoning:
Segregation harms Black children psychologically
Violates Equal Protection Clause (14th Amendment)
Grassroots Activism
Change driven by ordinary people, not just leaders
Examples:
Sit-ins
Boycotts
Marches
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Banned discrimination in:
Public spaces
Employment
Allowed federal enforcement
Bigger meaning:
Marked a major expansion of federal power to enforce equality
Voting Rights Act of 1965
Prohibited voting discrimination (literacy tests, etc.)
Allowed federal oversight of elections
Bigger meaning:
Directly targeted systemic barriers to Black political power
Bracero Program
Temporary labor agreement between U.S. and Mexico
Brought millions of Mexican workers to the U.S.
Key issue:
Workers faced:
Wage theft
Poor conditions
No legal protections
Hart-Cellar Act
Eliminated racial quotas from immigration policy
Signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson on October 3, 1965, it replaced quotas with a preference system prioritizing family reunification and skilled immigrants, dramatically diversifying American immigration
Prison Industrial Complex
Expansion of prisons as a solution to economic and social problems:
Unemployment
Surplus land
Political instability
➡ Bigger meaning:
Criminalization replaces social welfare → controls marginalized populations
American Indian Movement
Activist group fighting for:
Treaty rights
Sovereignty
Cultural preservation
Used protests (Alcatraz, Wounded Knee) to demand recognition
Civil Rights Act of 1964
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a landmark federal law that ended legal segregation and banned discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in public places, schools, and employment. It also gave the federal government the power to enforce desegregation and ensure equal access to public accommodations and jobs.
Voting Rights Act of 1965
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a major civil rights law that protected the right to vote by banning racial discrimination in voting practices, such as literacy tests and other barriers used to disenfranchise Black voters. It also allowed the federal government to oversee elections and enforce voting rights in areas with a history of discrimination.
Allotment
division of communal tribal land into individual plots
Tribal sovereignty
right of Native nations to govern themselves
Assimilation
pressure to abandon Native culture and adopt white American norms
Blood quantum
measuring Native identity by ancestry percentage
Racial etiquette
informal social rules enforcing Black deference and white dominance
The Poor People’s Campaign
a major effort led by Martin Luther King Jr. and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference to fight poverty and economic inequality across all races in the United States.