1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
glenn
fMRI scan on 17 p’s with varying psychopathy
p’s with higher psycho scores showed reduced activity in the amygdala during emotional moral decision making
amygdala functioning is disrupted during moral decision making in psychopathy
amygdala link to criminal behaviour
reduced amygdala activation may be undeterred from conning and manipulating others
predisposing them to impulsive behaviour and engaging in criminal behaviour without remorse
amygdala: correlation, not causation
cannot be said amygdala causes criminal behaviour
might be that committing crime causes changes in activity not the other way around
weakness, know amygdala plays role in criminal behaviour, cannot draw causal conclusions from evidence at this time
amygdala: pardini
study of 503 males, part of study at 6/7 years old
20 years later, identify indv who showed aggressive behaviour since first study
fMRI measured amygdala volume, found aggressive correlated with lower amygdala volumes
therefore, differences in amygdala volume could be used to predict involvement in crime
amygdala: non violent crimes
suggests amygdala has involvement in aggressive/ criminal behaviour
struggles to explain other crimes such as shoplifting and fraud
aggression/ violence plays no role
therefore, doesn’t explain all types of criminal behaviour
inherited criminality
criminal behaviour can be inherited
osborn and west: family
compared sons of criminal and non-criminal fathers
13% sons of non-crime fathers had criminal convictions, 40% sons with crime fathers
suggests criminal behaviour may be inherited
higher rates of criminality seen in sons with criminal fathers
raine: twin
reviewed the literature comparing the delinquent behaviour of twins
average concordance rate was higher for MZ twins (52%) than DZ twins (21%)
higher concordance rate in MZ than DZ
therefore, suggests some genetic influence on criminal behaviour
candidate genes
genes identified that could play a role in the development of a disease/ disorder
brunner: maoa gene
warrior gene - linked to aggressive and anti social behaviour
analysed dna of 28 male members of dutch family with history of impulsive & violent crim behaviour (rape and attempted murder)
men shared mutation in the maoa gene - low levels of maoa
suggests that criminality can be inherited
genes: tiihonen
supporting evidence
900 finnish offenders - evidence of low maoa activity, and CDH13
estimated 5-10% all violent crime in finland due to abnormalities in these genes
howver, generalisability of findings questioned, all Ps finnish
therefore, study suggests candidate genes → violent crimes, study lacks credibility
genes: reductionist
oversimplifies causes of criminal behaviour down to genetics
doesn’t consider other factors such as upbringing and environment
this means that the explanation is incomplete
reduces how understanding of what could potentially cause criminal behaviour
genes: biological determinism
say that criminal behaviour caused by genes, it can give people an excuse for their behaviour
this could cause people to have diminished responsibility in court proceedings and potentially get reduced sentences
however, makes criminal behaviour more predictable
therefore, could lead to problems determining guilt, but could give early intervention to mitigate this problem