COMM LAW

0.0(0)
Studied by 4 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/74

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 7:16 PM on 4/9/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

75 Terms

1
New cards

SLAPP

Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation, suppress journalists and civic activists by suing them into silence or inaction.

2
New cards

Can a question be a defamatory statement?

Yes, if it amounts to a statement of putative fact

3
New cards

What are the six things a plaintiff in a libel or slander lawsuit must prove

  • 1. Defamation 

  • 2. Identification

  • 3. Publication

  • 4. Fault 

  • 5. Falsity 

  • 6. Actual malice/harm

4
New cards

Categories of defamation per se:

  • 1. Crime, accusing someone of being a criminal

  • 2. Having a loathsome or contagious disease (particularly STDs)

    • One alone is not enough, gotta be both

  • 3. Homosexuality/Transgender 

  • 4. Incompetence in trade or profession

  • 5. Female promiscuity (not male)

5
New cards

Is mislabeling someone’s race or nationality defamation?

No

6
New cards

Are jokes defamatory?

No, because a reasonable person would not take them as serious statements of fact

7
New cards

Defamation

Expression that damages a person’s standing in the community through words that attack a character's individual character or professional abilities 

8
New cards

What are the two types of defamation?

Libel: Written defamation

Slander: Spoken or gestured defamation

9
New cards

What is trade libel?

Trade libel (aka Product Disparagement) defames the quality or usefulness of a product rather than the company that produced it

10
New cards

How many federal/circuit courts are there in the United States?

13

11
New cards

Forum shopping

Strategic practice of choosing a court or jurisdiction with favorable laws to that case

12
New cards

Renting certiorari

Formal order from a higher court directing a lower court to send a case up for review

13
New cards

Denying certiorari

The term for when a higher court refuses to hear a case from a lower court

14
New cards

How do you cite court cases?

Litigant v. Litigant,

1.Reporter Volume
2.Court Reporter
3.First page of decision
4. (Year of decision )

Ex: NY Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 264 (1964).

15
New cards

What is the typeface used for books and their authors?

Large and Small caps

16
New cards

Four privacy torts

  • Public disclosure of private facts

  • Intrusion upon seclusion 

  • False light distortion

  • Appropriation of likeness or image

17
New cards

What makes a case a criminal case?

If the government (DA) is prosecuting

18
New cards

What source can you not use supra for?

Court cases

19
New cards

Which tort is not a publicity tort?

Intrusion upon seclusion

20
New cards

The standard of proof in a criminal case is proof

beyond a reasonable doubt   

21
New cards

Which medium gets the highest level of First Amendment protection?

Supermarket tabloids

22
New cards

If at the conclusion of a civil trial there is a tie vote by the jury, who wins the case? 

The defendant

23
New cards

What are the five freedoms protected by the first amendment?

Freedom, press, assembly, religion, and petition

24
New cards

What type of speech is never protected by the First Amendment?

Fighting Words

25
New cards

Which part of the U.S. Constitution specifically mentions a right to privacy?      

None of it

26
New cards

Actual Damages

Court-awarded monetary compensation designed to make a plaintiff "whole" by covering proven, tangible losses resulting from a defendant’s wrongful conduct.

27
New cards

Special Damages

Specific, quantifiable financial losses resulting from a defendant's wrongful act or breach of contract.

28
New cards

Absolute privilege

Protects statements made in official proceedings 

29
New cards

Qualified/Conditional Privilege

Protects statements made in good faith on matters of shared interest, such as employment references or internal business communications

30
New cards

Which free speech philosopher says First Amendment protection should be given to any person who criticizes government officials?

Vincent Blasi

31
New cards

Actual Malice

Publishing a statement with knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard for the truth

32
New cards

Marketplace of Ideas

First Amendment metaphor holding that truth emerges from the free competition of ideas, rather than censorship, allowing the best ideas to prevail

33
New cards

Central hudson four part test

Determines whether a government regulation of commercial speech is constitutional

34
New cards

Four parts of Central Hudson test

  • 1. Is commercial speech eligible for first amendment protection?

  • 2. Does the government regulation serve a substantial government interest?

  • 3. Does the government regulation directly advance that government interest? 

  • 4. Is the government regulation of commercial speech narrowly tailored to advance that government substantial interest? 

35
New cards

What is an advertisement, legally speaking?

An inducement to engage in a commercial transaction

36
New cards

Payola

Secret or undisclosed advertising in radio

37
New cards

Plugola

Secret or undisclosed advertising in broadcast television

38
New cards

Types of information that journalists can publish that may taint a jury

Confessions (may be false), Criminal Records (doesn’t matter), and Failing or refusing to take a lie detector test (flawed machine)

39
New cards

What trial establishes the precedent that criminal trials must be open to the public

Richmond Newspapers vs. Virginia

40
New cards

To avoid a tainted jury, the judge can do the following

  • Grant a change of venue: Meaning if the news media in a particular area have posted info on criminal records, etc, the judge can move it somewhere else 

  • Change of venire, pulling jury from another area and bringing them to the original location 

  • Granting a continuous (delaying the trial), usually done to let media hype die down 

  • Sequestration: Locking away the jury from the outside world 

  • Voir dire: Eliminate biased jurors after questioning

41
New cards

What is the highest level of fault?

Actual malice

42
New cards

Invasions of privacy most often cause harm to:

Psyche

43
New cards

Privacy rights have been linked to which part of the U.S. Constitution?

4th amendment

44
New cards

What is a journalist’s best defense to a lawsuit for publishing private facts? 

Newsworthiness

45
New cards

What is the standard of proof in a libel case?

Clear and convincing

46
New cards

What is the standard of proof in criminal prosecution?                      

Beyond a reasonable doubt

47
New cards

Briefly explain the difference between compensatory and punitive damages

COMPENSATORY DAMAGES MAKE THE PLAINTIFF WHOLE WITH MONEY TO REPAIR WHATEVER IS HARMED OR REPLACE THE MONEY THAT IS LOST                                                                           

PUNITIVE DAMAGES ARE DESIGNED TO PUNISH THE DEFENDANT / WRONGDOER

48
New cards

What types of cases are NOT open trials?

Juvenile trial preceding, family court preceding, and grand jury preceding

49
New cards

Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia (1980)

Supreme Court ruled that criminal trials must be open to the public, establishing a First Amendment right of access.

50
New cards

Challenge for cause

A request during jury selection (voir dire) to disqualify a potential juror by providing a specific, valid legal reason why they cannot be fair and impartial. Requires justification and judge approval (unlimited amount)

51
New cards

Peremptory challenge

A right in jury selection for attorneys to dismiss a limited number of potential jurors without stating a reason. You cannot use this challenge to get rid of someone based on any demographic (selected amount)

52
New cards

Batson challenge

An objection raised during jury selection, arguing that the opposing party is using peremptory strikes to exclude potential jurors solely on the basis of race, ethnicity, or gender (usually done after a trial)

53
New cards

Gag orders

A judge’s order that a case may not be discussed in public. Can be used against prosecutors, defenders, witnesses, and officers

54
New cards

Civil contempt

Used to coerce compliance and lasts until compliance, proof standard is clear and convincing, is purgeable if order is followed

55
New cards

Criminal contempt

Used to punish the offender and lasts on a fixed term, proof standard is beyond a reasonable doubt, is not purgeable

56
New cards

A "no bill"

Means a grand jury has decided there is insufficient evidence to charge a person with a crime, resulting in no formal indictment

57
New cards

What is a jurors right to nullify?

It means they can interpret what they think is right in terms of justice, in a way ignoring the law. Based on John Peter Zenger’s trial.

58
New cards

Res judicata

A broader procedural doctrine (civil/criminal) barring relitigation of claims already decided on the merits

59
New cards

Freedom of information act (FOIA)

Allows access to records held by the federal government 

(Does not apply to white house, congress, supreme court or any federal court)

60
New cards

Five exemptions to FOIA:

  • Records that would impinge upon national security

  • Confidential business information

  • Personnel files 

  • Medical and similar files 

  • Ongoing law enforcement investigations

61
New cards

What case led to FOIA protections lasting beyond a person’s death?

Vince Foster case (National Archives and Records Administration v. Favish)

62
New cards

Branzburg v. Hayes precedent

A reporter cannot claim First Amendment protection in withholding confidentially received information from a grand jury

63
New cards

Subpoena:

A court order that requires a person to do something

64
New cards

Nike v. Kasky

Court said: Even though at no point did you tell your audience to buy Nike shoes, the entire reason you responded was because your sales and stock price went down (ONLY APPLICABLE IN CALIFORNIA)

65
New cards

Duces tecum

A court order requiring a person or entity to produce documents, electronically stored information, or tangible evidence for a trial

66
New cards

Ad testificandum

A court order requiring a person to appear at a specific time and place 

67
New cards

Search warrant

Judicial document authorizing law enforcement to search a specific location, cannot be fought

68
New cards

Quashing a subpoena

A formal legal request asking a court to invalidate, void, or modify a subpoena that is improper, unreasonable, or burdensome

69
New cards

Zurcher v. Stanford Daily (1978)

Ruled that law enforcement can use a search warrant to search newsrooms for evidence, even if journalists are not suspected of crimes

70
New cards

Privacy protection act

Prohibits government officials from searching for or seizing a journalist’s "work product" or "documentary materials" intended for public dissemination

71
New cards

Exemptions to Privacy Protection Act

  • The material sought is related to national defense or is classified 

  • Material sought is to prevent death or injury to a human being

  • That there is probable cause that the person possessing the materials committed the crime

72
New cards

Documentary materials

Information or records that the journalist did not create (PPA would be lenient in allowing a search warrant for these)

73
New cards

Work-product materials:

  • Stuff the journalist created (hard for a search warrant to get these)

    • Ex. transcripts, photos created by journalist

74
New cards

Chilling Effect

The inhibition or discouragement of legal rights by the threat of sanction, surveillance, or government overreach

75
New cards