1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Explain how Kant’s deontological approach to ethics might be applied to the issue of stealing. (12)
Kant argues that we have duties to do certain things which are right
Moral duties are discoverable by reason
Only the good will is good without qualification
To have good will is to do your duty because it is your duty
Moral duties are categorical and not hypothetical
Categorical imperatives come from the Categorical Imperative
Is a categorical imperative if it avoids contradiction in will + conception
State why you can’t steal bc it isn’t universalisable
Explain hedonistic utilitarianism and explain the criticism that it ignores the moral integrity of the individual. (12)
Utilitarianism = utility principle
Hedonist = pleasure is good
Argues that utilitarians ignore moral character, commitments, beliefs etc
For example, if a man is in poor health and is struggling to make ends meet, and is offered a job in chemical warfare
He is a pacifist, and if he says no, the job will go to someone else who will likely work harder
Should he take the job?
Hedonist utilitarians would say that he should
However, this ignores pacifist principles
Explain Aristotle’s view on how we develop moral character and how this is challenged by the issue of circularity in his definition of ‘virtuous acts.’ (12)
Moral character = possession of virtues
We do not have them by nature, but have the capability of acquiring them
Skills analogy
Could be argued that it is circular
Aristotle defines a ‘virtuous act’ as an act which would be performed by a virtuous person
A virtuous person = someone who does virtuous acts
Etc
Explain Bentham’s utilitarianism and explain how Nozick’s experience machine challenges this view. (12)
Bentham = hedonistic utilitarianism
Qualitative utilitarian
Intensity
Duration
Certainty
Propinquity
Fecundity
Purity
Extent
Machine gives you any experience that you desire
When connected, you can feel the pleasures from the inside, but not actually do them
The hedonist utilitarian would say yes
We should just care about what is actually the case