1/63
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
personality
psychological systems that contribute to an individual’s enduring and distinctive patterns of experience and behaviour
personality disposition - enduring
somewhat consistent across contexts and time
personality disposition - distinctive
unique / different / distinct to me / not universal
goals of personality research: to understand…
structure
growth and development
personality process
psychopathology and behaviour change
main goals for personality theorist
scientific observation
scientific theory
observation and theory → application/practice
main goals for personality theorist: CATSS
theory that is Comprehensive
Application: from theory to practice
theory that is Testable
theory that is Systematic
observation that is Scientific
toolkit theory
theories are like toolkits - include concepts, research methods, techniques for assessing personality, therapy
three major methods used in personality research
case studies
correlational studies
experimental studies
case studies strengths/weaknesses
strength: allow for in-depth study of individuals in their setting/context
weakness: subjective (therapist’s beliefs may inadvertently bias presentation of case study); do not establish causal relationships
correlational studies strengths/weaknesses
strength: study relationships between many variables; large samples easily obtained
weakness: problems with reliability and validity of self-report questionnaires; do not establish causal relationships
experimental studies strengths/weaknesses
strength: can establish cause-effect relationships
weakness: lab-based (are findings generalisable to the real world?)
cross-sectional studies
different people measured at same time
groups differ by age, cohort, condition
fast and low cost - single data collection
cannot distinguish aging from cohort effects
no tracking of individual change over time
longitudinal studies
same people measured repeatedly over time
tracks individual change across lifespan
time-intensive - months, years, decades
avoids cohort confounds, reveals true development
risk of attrition (participant dropout over time)
LOTS of data
L-data = info that can be obtained from person’s life history/records
O-data = info provided by knowledgable observers such as parents, friends, teachers
T-data = info obtained from experimental procedures or standardised tasks
S-data = info provided by subject, typically in form of responses to questionnaires
Dunedin study
862 participants, 93% Pākehā
longitudinal research design
temperament rated at 3 years by interviewers at end of home visit
personality assessed at 18 years with multidimensional personality questionnaire
Dunedin study key longitudinal findings
under-controlled → high impulsivity, danger seeking, negative emotionality
inhibited → restrained behaviour, safe, non-assertive, submissive
confident → high impulsivity
reserved → low social potency
well-adjusted → ‘normative behaviours’
critical reflexivity
having opinions, responses, reactions, biases, questions. consider where these may come from, how they might be different, how they impact my behaviour
purpose of personality assessment
yield basic data to help inform different goals. can be used to predict people’s behaviour and tested using experimental research or as applied tools
what psychometrics assess
average behaviour / tendencies
variability in behaviour
conscious thought - thoughts, feelings, emotions
unconscious mental events
reliability
replicability - are measures consistent over time?
impacts on reliability - a person’s mood/context, misunderstanding question
internal consistency - do different items on a test correlate with one another?
test-retest reliability - if people take the test twice, will they get similar results?
validity
accuracy - do observations reflect phenomena of interest?
measure considered valid if it captures intended measurement
construct validity - measure needs to relate to specific phenomenon
discriminant validity - measure should not correlate highly with measures of different things
problem with self-report
inaccuracy with what people say about themselves
self-report bias, deliberate distortion of response
not always consciously aware of why they made a choice
types of bias
acquiescence bias - tendency to agree/disagree consistently with items regardless of content
social desirability bias - responding based on desirable responses
likert scales
specify level of agreement or disagreement for series of statements/items, answers capture intensity of feeling for item
ethics of personality assessment
a tool, not a definitive source of info about person
psychologists must hold high standards of accuracy and fairness, tests have ability to impact person’s life
factors influence performance on psychometrics
what psychometrics don’t capture
not representative of human life
does not answer crucial questions of human existence
influence of culture, situational context, age/gender, developmental period, life experiences
Freud’s topographical model
the conscious: that which we know
the preconscious: that which we can bring to mind
the unconscious: that which we do not know → unacceptable memories/feelings, influence us without awareness, dominated by ‘primary process thinking’
how Freud’s topographical model works
model of ‘energy’ flowing through psyche
powerful energy associated with primitive impulses in unconscious seeks release into consciousness
energy held back by repression
energy ‘leaks’ into consciousness
evidence for active unconscious
subliminal perception impacts behaviour - showing pictures of spiders below level of awareness reduced fear of spiders
subliminal messages designed to activate unconscious conflict impacts behaviour - women ate more crackers after seeing picture of crying baby
Freud’s structural model
id: primitive drives, operates according to ‘pleasure principle’, dominates in childhood and is repressed later
superego: develops last and helps negotiate moral demands of society, operates according to ‘morality principle’, internalised demands result in high standards / self-criticism
ego: mediates between other parts of mind and external world, operates according to ‘reality principle’ trying to balance impulses of id and superego
key concept of conflict
ego defences
repression: blocks internal memories/emotions
denial: avoids anxiety by refusing to acknowledge reality
projection: attributes unacceptable feelings to others
displacement: directs impulses toward target
isolation: disconnects idea from feelings associated with it
reaction formation: acts in opposite way of impulse they are afraid to acknowledge
undoing: attempt to repair/counter previous destructive actions
intellectualisation: overly rational response aimed at distancing
sublimation: expresses unacceptable wishes in socially acceptable ways e.g. art
importance of mind structure for personality
personality partly determined by unconscious factors
different aspects of personality operating in conflict with one another
personality is product of ego’s attempt to manage conflict through characteristic defences
structures and processes are common, but particular way they play out shapes individual personality
Freud’s stage theory of development
experiences of world shaped by developmental stage
the way in which each stage is negotiated leaves trace in personality
multiple strands of personality left by different stages
Freud’s developmental stages
oral (0-18m): pleasure centres on mouth - sucking, biting, chewing
anal (18-36m): pleasure centres on bowel/bladder elimination, coping with demands for control
phallic (3-6y): pleasure centres on genitals, coping with incestuous sexual feelings
latency (6-puberty): dormant sexual feelings, identification process
genital (puberty-): maturation of sexual interests
Oedipus complex
based on myth of Oedipus
boy wants mother to himself, competition with father, experiences ‘castration anxiety’, accepts power of father, internalises father and takes other women as love object
girl wants mother, imagines she has penis, recognises she nor mother have penis, experiences ‘penis envy’, gives up mother as love object and turns to father, identifies powerlessness of mother
fixation and regression as basis of personality
oral: demanding, needy, mistrustful
anal: need for control and fear of loss of control
phallic: (male) exhibitionist, competitive, success. (female) exhibitionist, seductive, flirtatious
Erikson’s psychosocial theory
infancy: trust vs mistrust, physical/emotional needs met
early childhood: autonomy vs shame, exploration
preschool age: initiative vs guilt, make decisions
school age: industry vs inferiority, gender-role identity
adolescence: identity vs role confusion, goals, life meaning
young adulthood: intimacy vs isolation, form intimate relationships
middle age: generativity vs stagnation, help next generation
later life: integrity vs despair, no regrets and personal worth
what psychoanalysts contribute to understanding of personality
personalities are complex and contradictory
personalities are mysterious to ourselves and not entirely under conscious control
personalities are shaped by past (relationships), unconscious conflicts, how we protect ourselves
personalities are less about ‘rational’ choices and more about irrational feelings
‘real’ motivations are often unknown to us and sometimes operate against conscious interests
psychoanalysis in contemporary theorising
shift from notion of ‘instincts’ towards unacceptable wishes and uncomfortable memories
focus more on past relationships shaping personality
examination of present relationships as reflection of past relationships
reinterpretation of psychoanalysis through social/feminist lens
research methods in psychoanalysis
case studies
randomised control trials
experimental studies
neurological observations and studies
psychoanalysis strengths
deeper understanding of personality
matches intuitive understanding of self
research evidence
starting point for other personality theories
psychoanalysis weaknesses
early reliance of case study method - questions of generalisability
theory untestable - concepts too abstract
theory unfalsifiable
complex and difficult to understand
John Bowlby attachment theory
humans primed for attachment, instinctive imprinting
critical period for attachment - up to 5 years
disruptions in this period haven lasting impacts on emotion, cognition, behaviour
different attachment experiences lead to ‘internal working models’ of relationships that persist into adulthood
Bowlby’s stages of separation
protest
despair
detachment
maternal deprivation hypothesis
warm, intimate, continuous relationship with mother figure is necessary for healthy psychological/emotional development. drew attention to risks of institutional care, hospitalisation practices, inadequate care situations
criticism of maternal deprivation hypothesis
used to entrench gender roles and constrain women’s freedom
should focus on quality of attachment rather than just separation of mother
recognition of resilience of children in face of adversity
focus on “good enough mother”
the Strange Situation (Mary Ainsworth)
parent and infant settle in room
stranger enters
parent leaves
stranger stays
1st reunion (parent returns)
parent leaves again
stranger returns
2nd reunion (parent returns)
Ainsworth attachment styles
secure attachment (70%): infant distressed but easily comforted on return
dismissive-avoidant insecure attachment (20%): infant not distressed and showed little need for comfort on return
resistant insecure attachment (10%): infant distressed and unable to be comforted on return
disorganised attachment: contradictory and disorganised behaviour e.g. calling for mother then pushing her away
secure attachment
parent: sensitive, timely, responsive, allows exploration
child: better emotion regulation, better social relationships, more persistent in challenges, more resilient to stress
avoidant attachment
parent: difficulty responding to child’s emotional needs
child: learns to ‘shut down’ emotional needs, turns away from intimacy during stress
resistant attachment
parent: unpredictable, unreliable, mis-attuned
child: struggle with separation, has to ‘turn up’ signals to get emotional needs met, want help from parent but can be oppositional and angry
disorganised attachment
parent: paradox, source of fear and only source of potential comfort
child: no organised system will work, emotion dysregulation, dissociative experiences, associated with trauma/abuse
shifts in attachment research
recognition of caregivers rather than mothers
inclusion of other relationships e.g. fathers, peers
move from focus on only children to recognition of adult attachment patterns
studies exploring continuity or change in attachment patterns
adult attachment (Mary Main)
developed adult attachment interview
example prompt: 5 adjectives to describe mother/father
identified overall attachment style rather than attachment to particular person
styles: secure-autonomous, dismissing, anxiously preoccupied
attachment theory strengths
draws attention to importance of relationships
methods allow for empirical examination of core psychoanalytic ideas
ensure appropriate resourcing of early relationships
attachment theory weaknesses
reinforces gender sterotypes
places too much emphasis on individual rather than collective relationships
neglects significance of broader social context e.g. poverty
issues re continuity vs discontinuity
reifying and biologising of attachment
humanism
inherent potential for positive growth
holistic understanding of person
valuing capacity to reason
each individual is unique
capacity for human agency
construct own meaning
respect for others
challenge to hierarchical power arrangements
politics of human rights, democracy, social justice
Rogers’ person-centred approach