Class voting in Canada

0.0(0)
Studied by 4 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/5

Last updated 2:53 PM on 4/20/23
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

6 Terms

1
New cards
Canadian class
Has classes, but %%weak class voting%%

%%modernity thesis%% = rise of labor→ rise of labor parties→ differenciation between votes from working/elite classes

Seems like class position is %%less important than regionalism, language, religion etc%%

NDP= strong enough working class base but not enough to win
2
New cards
CCF to NDP
@@Canadian Commonwealth Federation@@ = 1933 as a response to great depression, @@populist party of the left.@@ @@Tommy Douglas@@ (35-44) = founding member and fed minister. PM of Sask 44-61. @@Main policy demand = universal healthcare@@

Successful enough to keep L on their toes

1958= fed election, CCF routed → want soul + win so @@1961 change structure (NDP) w/ affiliation to unions@@ (lead by Douglas from 61-71)
3
New cards
Labor and NDP: imperfect union
CLC (canadian labor congress) ==cant control local unions== = within unions not agreeing, wont all vote for NDP, ==difference between male and female dominated fields = ununified left==, unions themselves are fractures
4
New cards
Intersection with national question
Fed NDP (Broadbent) = social welfare ^^through strong support for fed gov,^^ support in ^^patriation^^ (Qc feels disregarded)

^^Sovereignist left^^ of QC = ^^strongly associated with PQ^^

^^J. Layton^^ (2003-11) sees weakness of L in QC as opportunity, proposes “^^assymetrical fed^^”
5
New cards
The orange wave of 2011
3333% of popular vote, official opposition to conservatives, historic breakthroughinQCbreakthrough in QC, competing directly w/L as party of social progressives, attractssoftsovereignistsattracts soft sovereignists (BQ voters)

doesn’t last: end in 2015→ QCfourwaysplit+strat.votingQC four way split + strat. voting (L to vs C), weakpartisanattachementweak partisan attachement to NDP in QC, Niqab debate, incentivesincentives pushing in different directions (FPTPFPTP, relationship w/ labor, progressive/tradcleavageprogressive/trad cleavage…)
6
New cards
Class voting from 1965-2019, Polacko et al.
^^working clas^^s shifting support to C for ^^cultural reasons, still fragmented^^

dependent variable = vote choice (BQ, L, NDP and “right”)→ ^^class voting = explanatory power and itself has many categories^^ (class = occupation)

In Qc, ^^NDP not a working class story, but is outside of QC^^

^^shift to C for moral traditionalism^^ (gender q etc) + concern for immigration