Evaluate The View That The Supreme Court Operates With Sufficient Judicial Neutrality and Independence. (30)

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/5

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 11:28 AM on 6/1/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

6 Terms

1
New cards

AGREE 1

Rules they must follow to remain neutral

must not undertake any political activity such as campaigning for political parties

judge must have at least 2 years’ experience in a senior judicial role.

Current President of the SC Lord Robert Reed has served as a senior judge since 1998.

2
New cards

DISAGREE 1

Judges lack diversity

the Times – “pale, male and stale”

9/12 male, 12/12 white 11/12 studied at Oxbridge and all are over 60.

3
New cards

AGREE 2

Structural reforms which have promoted independence. Also, other ways it is independent such as security of tenure

Constitutional reform act separated the judiciary from the legislature by creating the Supreme Court.

Judges can’t be removed from office unless they break the law or are impeached by a vote in both houses of parliament. They can serve until they are 75.

4
New cards

DISAGREE 2

Lack of diversity can Influence how judges rule on complex social issues such as cases involving race and immigration.

Shamima begum case – many argue that the judges lacked consideration of issues i.e grooming and were overly supportive to executive power

5
New cards

AGREE 3

Ruling against the government.

miller v secretary of state for exiting the EU – government couldn’t trigger article 50 without parliamentary approval.

Boris Johnson proroguing of parliament – unlawful.

6
New cards

DISAGREE 3

 

Media and political pressure can undermine judicial independence and public perception of neutrality.

SC ruled that gov couldn’t trigger article 50 without consent parliament. SC labelled “enemies of the people” - daily mail framed their ruling as politically motivated. Liz truss as lord chancellor failed to defend judges