History's Hockey Stick

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/5

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Last updated 10:38 AM on 4/13/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

6 Terms

1
New cards

What is a Ratio Scale? Why is it utilised for GDP?

-Where the Y Axis will increase at a multiple of either 2x, 3x, 10x etc…

-Using it for GDP allows to compare growth rates - if it is a straight line then it grows at a constant rate

2
New cards

What is the formula for growth rate?

Lol

<p>Lol</p>
3
New cards

Illustrate what the Hockey Stick Graph looks like, and where the upwards momentum really took off

-For Britain, growth began at around 1650 and exploded around the 1820s

-For Japan, it began around the 1780s and exploded around the 1850s

-For Italy, it began around the 1820s, and exploded soon afterwards

-For China, it began its downward trend at around 1700 and launched upwards only in the 1950s

-For India, the same story as the Chinese, only that its lag behinds.

<p>-For Britain, growth began at around 1650 and exploded around the 1820s </p><p>-For Japan, it began around the 1780s and exploded around the 1850s </p><p>-For Italy, it began around the 1820s, and exploded soon afterwards</p><p>-For China, it began its downward trend at around 1700 and launched upwards only in the 1950s</p><p>-For India, the same story as the Chinese, only that its lag behinds. </p>
4
New cards

Why did India and China lag behind?

-India: After 300 years of British Rule came to an end, the deprivation the children in India faced was massive. A child at the end of the British Raj’s lifetime could only expect to live up to 27. 50 years later, it is now at 65

-China: Once richer than Britain before the 1300s, but is now behind in terms of GDP Per Capita PPP Adjusted

5
New cards

What was the main takeaway from the Hockey Stick Graph

-For an extremely long time, living standards didn’t grow in a sustainable way

-When it did occur, it happened at different times in different nations, leading to differences in living standards across the world

6
New cards

Adam Smith - give some key Economic Facts about him

-His ‘An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of Wealth of Nations’ talked of the coordination amongst all the economic actors may just randomly occur without any person/institution consciously attempting to create/maintain it. Went against the current notion of where rulers imposed order. The Invisible Hand

-This could occur as a result of individuals pursuing their self-interest. This also benefitted social overall - because it is in his own interest to do so

-The Division of Labour / Specialisation, according to Smith, constitutes a significant source of prosperity, due to the huge productive benefits it brought about - the Pin Factory example

-And such productive measures were paired with the construction of canals and foreign trade, as such a huge supply had to find buyers wherever it could.

-However, in ‘The Theory of Moral Sentiments’, he talked about how the Market System can fail, especially when sellers band together to avoid competing. He specially targeted government-protected monopolies like the East India Companies

-He wanted a Government to be involved with the economy in terms of Defence, Infrastructure, Justice and more.