1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Challenges of Conflict-Prone Minerals
Why rough diamonds (KP)? Why gold, coltan, tin and tungsten (ICGLR-RCM)?
"Lootability"
Production "supply chains" and trade conduits, from local to global markets
Negative impact on human security (e.g., human rights; environmental security; forced migration - interdependencies)
Transnational Norms and Governance Responses of Conflict-Prone Minerals
Dynamics of African state and non-state actors as norm entrepreneurs and antipreneurs
KP: Kimberely Process Certification Scheme
ICGLR: Regional Certification Mechanism
Several achievements
KP: late 1990s = 5-20% to 0.2% in 2024
ICGLR: hundreds of RCM certificates issued since 2013
Various drawbacks
KP: Zimbabwe and CAR
ICGLR-RCM: wider participation beyond Rwanda, funding
The Kimberely Process
Launched in May 2000 as a response to several civil conflicts in Africa that were fuelled in part by diamond proceeds in Sierra Leone, Angola, DR Congo, and Liberia
Is a non-binding “international understanding” among members, including diamond industry and civil society
Seeks to impose strict verification and trade controls on diamonds through the collaboration of state and non-state actors through the Kimberely Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) established in 2003 - decisions reached by consensus
84 participants, more than 99% of all diamond-trading and diamond-producing countries
Supported by the UN Security Council, UN General Assembly, G7/G8, WTO
International Conference on the Great Lakes Region (ICGLR)
Based on a treaty
ICGLR’s RCM
A mineral regulatory scheme for gold, coltan, tin, and tungsten; endorsed by all ICGLR members in December 2010
Includes 12 African member-states; AU, UN, other multilateral organizations, and several external states provide support
Modeled on the KPCS but has a non-rotating Secretariat
Successes and Near Successes of KP Governance
Republic of Congo (Brazzaville) was suspended (2004-2007) or non-compliance with the KPCS based on misuse of KPCs, misrepresentation of diamond exports, and failure to provide adequate details on its diamond mining sites
Côte d'Ivoire suspended from 2003 to 2013, though some leakage of conflict diamonds in mid-2000s (~200,000 carats per annum)
Near Failure of KP Governance
Marange; compromise; GW
Central African Republic (CAR) and Natural Resources/Conflict
Since late-2012, low-intensity civil war, and rebel-led coup of president, widespread HR abuses, Russian influence
Conflict diamonds possibly being mined by former rebels (Seleka) and allied militia groups from Bria, Sam Ouandja, and Bamingui regions
In May 2013, CAR suspended from the Kimberely Process (in 2011, CAR officially exported 323,575 carats worth $61.4 million) = no exports and no KP member imports; after around 5 years, suspension partially lifted allowing exports from certain designated areas
Sustainable Development and Resource Use
Environmental damage and degradation must be kept to a bare minimum
Non-renewable resources to be used sparingly I order to allow time to develop renewable and environmentally sound substitutes
Sustainable Development in the Future
Renewable resources are to be managed in a manner that does not exceed their rates of regeneration, thereby ensuring their use for future generations, both a process and a goal in and of itself
Global Environmental Governance
World Conservation Strategy (1980) and Brundtland Report (1987)
Agenda 21 & “Earth Summit” in Rio de Janeiro (1992)
1972-2009 - five UN-sponsored meetings on the environment
1997-2015 - Kyoto Protocol
2015-present - Paris Climate Agreement
Global Warming - Political Dynamics
A steady, long-term rise in the average world temperature
Caused in large measure by the burning of fossil fuels - also seen with climate change
Release of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases (methane, nitrous oxide, chlorofluorocarbons) - also seen with climate change
Dilemmas of Climate Change
Justifying short term and predictable costs versus long-term and potentially unpredictable gains
Targeting certain sectors such as oil companies and industrial workers to sacrifice the most in order for society at large to benefit while incurring relatively little in the way of economic hardship
Certain countries would have to agree to suffer the most in terms of lost economic growth so that all states would benefit
The Montréal Protocol
Adopted in 1987 when 22 countries agreed to reduce CFCs by 50% by 1998
In 1990, the Montréal Protocol was expanded in scope and number of signatories - 81 countries agreed to eliminate all CFCs by 2000
Signatories also agreed to establish a fund that would help countries of the Global South pay for alternative refrigeration technologies that did not use CFCs, importance of epistemic communities
Carbon Offsetting
In order to compensate for the emissions caused by transportation or electricity use, a purchase of an emission reduction credit is made from an organization or project that results in less carbon dioxide, or other GHGs in the atmosphere
Examples of Carbon Offsetting
Funding for renewable energy such as wind farms, solar, geothermal, and biomass (tree-planting and ‘green roofing’ are popular, but do not seek to displace the use of fossil fuels)