Phobias - Case study Watson + Reyner (1920)

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/8

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 4:43 PM on 4/8/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

9 Terms

1
New cards

When did Watson + Reyner do their study?

(1920)

2
New cards

Who did the case study on phobias?

Watson + Reyner (1920)

3
New cards

Who did a case study on phobias in 1920?

Watson + Reyner

4
New cards

Why is Watson + Reyner (1920) a case study?

Followed lab procedure but only used 1 child

5
New cards

What was the aim of Watson + Reyner (1920)? (2)

-Classical conditioning can be used to explain how u squire phobias

-A fear response can be created in a child to a previously neutral stimulus

6
New cards

Watson + Reyner (1920) method (4)

  1. 9 months old Little Albert given a variety of stimulus including noise of a hammer striking a bar. Response recorded

  2. Only fear to noise making it the UCS

  3. UCS and NS (white rat) paired together. Conditioning phase

  4. Lil Albert shown white rat only and response recorded and compared to baseline

7
New cards

Watson + Reyner (1920) findings (2)

-By the 3rd trial, Albert avoided white rat (behavioural phobia response)

-Albert had a fear response to other items resembling the white eg: fur collar of mother’s coat (fear had become generalised)

8
New cards

Watson + Reyner (1920) Conclusion (2)

-Possible to create a fear response using classical conditioning

-Possible for fear to generalise to similar objects

9
New cards

Why was Albert also afraid of his mother’s fur collar?

His fear had generalised to similar looking objects