1/28
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
SCOTUS
Supreme Court is the only court officially established by Constitution
Article III Section I
"the judicial Power of the U.S. shall be vested in 1 supreme court, and in such inferior courts as the congress may from time to time ordain & establish"
Judges
- appointed by POTUS
- hold lifetime appointments
Original jurisdiction
- the Supreme Court can hear a case for the 1st time
- Affecting ambassadors, public officials, and disputes b/t states
Appellate jurisdiction
- the Supreme Court can only hear appeals from lower courts
- Majority of cases that appear before supreme court are appeals → appellate
Attorney General
- chief legal officer and head of the DOJ
- enforce federal laws & advise prez
Solicitor General
- decides which cases to appeal
- 4 judges to agree to hear a case, 5 to render a majority opinion
Majority opinion
official decision of the court, supported by ½ + of judges, & sets a legal, binding precedent
Concurring opinion
agrees w/ majority's outcome but for different legal reasons
Dissenting opinion
disagrees w/ majority's decision and explains why
Senatorial courtesy (blue slip policy)
home-state senators can confirm nominees for their state's local offices a blue slip to signal their approval/disapproval
Litmus test
- questions used to determine a nominee's stance on a specific issue which can factor how a senator chooses to respond to a blue slip
1. Nomination: short list
2. Investigation: checked out by FBI & ABA; rates: well qualified, qualified, not qualified
3. Lobbying: usually against candidates
4. Senate hearings: senate asks questions & judges answer; give a recommendation to the full committee
5. Vote: confirmed
Federalist 78
- Lifetime appointments for federal judges under good behavior (Keep judicial branch independent and protected from political pressure)
- judicial review: considers laws passed by Congress and making sure they're in line with constitution
- under the Constitution, the judicial branch would have the least amount of power (lacks power of purse & sword)
- acts as an intermediate body b/t ppl and congress
- Nature of the court gives it judicial review; not a defined power granted by the Constitution
Marbury v. Madison
- established judicial review
- Adams appointed federalist judges but some of their commissions weren't delivered before Jefferson took office
- Jefferson ordered Madison to withhold the remaining commissions, including Marbury's
- Marbury wanted court to issue a writ of mandamus (court order) to make Madison deliver his commission
- Court can't grant writ of mandamus bc Article 13 of Judiciary Act conflicts w/ Article III of Constitution (original jurisdiction) → Article 13 is unconstitutional
United States v. Nixon
restricted executive privilege; forced Nixon to turn over recordings
New York Times v. US
govt must justify preventing publication; affirmed freedom of the press under 1st
Shaw v. Reno
racial gerrymandering is subject to strict inspection under 14th's Equal Protection Clause
Whenever the court rules on a case, it creates a precedent
- The decision in question will act like a template for future decisions
- Brown v. Board of Education established the precedent that racial segregation in schools is unconstitutional
Stare decisis
- "let the decision stand"
- Court always considers past precedents when making their ruling
Certiorari
a formal order by a superior court to a lower court to send up the entire case for review, often when there's a conflict in lower court rulings on a federal law
Amicus curiae
a person/organization offering the court additional info about the case
Judicial activism
look beyond constitution; consider broad effects of a decision on society
Judicial restraint
- believes that judges aren't appointed to make policy; pay attention to precedents
- A law should be struck down only if it violates the actual written word of the Constitution
congress checks on judicial branch
- Passing laws that modify the impact of prior decisions
- Constitutional amendments
- Passing legislation that impacts the Court's jurisdiction
potus checks on judicial
- Judicial appointments
- POTUS not enforcing the decision handed down
Mitch McConnel's confirmation controversy
- 2016: when Antonin Scalia died, there were 269 days left before the presidential election, but he refused to allow a confirmation vote on Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court
- 2020: when Ruth Bader Ginsburg died, there were only 45 days before the presidential election, much less time than in 2016. Yet McConnell and Senate Republicans moved swiftly to confirm a replacement nominee
Eisenhower + Warren
- Eisenhower nominated Warren as chief justice, expecting a conservative one
- Warren's judicial activism when he wrote Brown v. Board of Education, a liberal decision
- Eisenhower later expressed regret
Nixon + Burger (after Warren)
- Nixon expected a conservative court, but Burger Court was a mix
- Roe v. Wade, limited affirmative action, U.S. v. Nixon
Chief Justice
- spokesperson of judicial branch
- Holds more responsibility than power
- Presides over inaugurations & impeachment