1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Marbury v Madison
Core Holding: Established judicial review (courts can declare laws unconstitutional).
Use It In FRQs: Power of the Supreme Court, checks and balances, constitution interpretation
Example FRQ Sentence: In __________________, the Court established judicial review, allowing it to invalidate laws that conflict with the Constitution.
McCulloch v Maryland
Core Holding: Expanded federal power through the Necessary and Proper Clause and denied states the ability to tax federal institutions.
Use It In FRQs: Federalism, implied powers, supremacy Clause
Example FRQ Sentence: ____________ upheld implied powers by ruling that Congress can create a national bank under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
United States v Lopez
Core Holding: Limited Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause.
Use It In FRQs: Limits of federal power, federalism, Commerce Clause
Example FRQ Sentence: In _____________, the Court ruled that carrying a gun in a school zone was not interstate commerce, limiting congressional power.
Engel v Vitale
Core Holding: School-sponsored prayer violates the Establishment Clause.
Use It In FRQs: First Amendment (religion), establishment Clause, civil liberties
Example FRQ Sentence: ____________ held that public schools cannot sponsor prayer, reinforcing the separation of church and state.
Wisconsin v Yoder
Core Holding: Protected religious freedom under the Free Exercise Clause.
Use It In FRQs: Free Exercise Clause, religious liberty vs. government interests
Example FRQ Sentence: In ____________, the Court ruled that compulsory school attendance laws violated Amish religious beliefs.
Tinker v Des Moines
Core Holding: Students have free speech rights unless it disrupts learning.
Use It In FRQs: Symbolic speech, First Amendment, limits of student rights
Example FRQ Sentence: ___________ protected symbolic speech by ruling that students could wear armbands in protest.
New York Times v United States
Core Holding: Protected press from prior restraint.
Use It In FRQs: Freedom of the press, limits of government power, national security vs. liberty
Example FRQ Sentence: In _____________, the Court ruled that the government could not block publication without proof of immediate harm.
Schenck v United States
Core Holding: Speech can be limited if it creates a “clear and present danger.”
Use It In FRQs: Limits on free speech, wartime powers, balancing liberty and security
Example FRQ Sentence: _________________ upheld limits on speech by establishing the “clear and present danger” test.
Gideon v Wainwright
Core Holding: Defendants have the right to an attorney in criminal cases.
Use It In FRQs: Due process, rights of the accused, incorporation
Example FRQ Sentence: In _____________, the Court ruled that states must provide attorneys to defendants who cannot afford one.
McDonald v Chicago
Core Holding: Incorporated the Second Amendment to apply to states.
Use It In FRQs: Selective incorporation, federal vs. state power, gun rights
Example FRQ Sentence: In ____________, the Court applied the Second Amendment to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Brown v Board of Education
Core Holding: School segregation violates the Equal Protection Clause.
Use It In FRQs: Civil rights, equal protection, role of courts in social change
Example FRQ Sentence: _________________ ruled that segregated schools are inherently unequal, overturning legalized segregation.