AO1- Loss of control

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/7

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:54 PM on 6/2/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

8 Terms

1
New cards

what type of defence is it?

A special defence to murder

2
New cards

where is it outlined?

In section 54 of the coroners and justice act 2009

3
New cards

if the defence is successful it…

reduces the charge from murder to voluntary manslaughter

4
New cards

what’s the first key element

The defendant must kill as a result of loss of self-control, doesn’t have to be sudden and it can be a time-lapse however threat must still be hanging over you (R v Ibrams and Gregory) for jury to decide. The defendant must lose total control, partial control is not sufficient. Feeling unwell or unable to think straight is not sufficient (R v Jewell)

5
New cards

what’s the second key element

Loss of control must have been caused by a recognised “qualifying trigger”. Defendants fear of serious violence for victim against defendant is sufficient ( R v Ward), if defendant has incited violence then defence will fail ( R v Dawes), or things said or done which not only constituted circumstances of an extremely grave character but also caused defendant to feel a sense of being seriously wronged, circumstances must be justifiable ( R v Hatter) ( R v Zebede)

6
New cards

what doesn’t amount as a qualifying trigger on its own

sexual infidelity ( R v Clinton)

7
New cards

what’s the third key element?

The objective test - a person with normal control might have reacted in the same way, short tempers cannot be taken into account ( R v Mohammed).

8
New cards

what circumstances may be taken into account for the third element

Depression, Epilepsy, History of sexual abuse. NOT intoxication ( R v Asmelash)