Institutional Structures : IEL

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 12:27 PM on 6/22/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

15 Terms

1
New cards

What is the key structural difference between MEAs that require ‘localized’ decision-making and those prescribing ‘global/regional’ decision-making?

A. Localized MEAs develop normative content through agreements at the level of the shared resource, whereas global MEAs develop content through a COP and subsidiary body system

B. Localized MEAs are legally binding; global MEAs are soft law only

C. Only global MEAs may be concluded as framework conventions

D. Localized MEAs require unanimous voting; global MEAs allow majority voting

A. Localized MEAs develop normative content through agreements at the level of the shared resource, whereas global MEAs develop content through a COP and subsidiary body system
2
New cards
The 1997 Watercourses Convention's approach to institutional structure at the global level is best described as: A. Establishing a complex COP system with scientific and compliance subsidiary bodies B. Mandating the creation of joint river commissions for all international watercourses C. Delegating normative development to the UN General Assembly D. Prescribing no institutional structure at the global level — suggesting but not requiring joint mechanisms or commissions at the watercourse level (Art. 8(2))
D. Prescribing no institutional structure at the global level — suggesting but not requiring joint mechanisms or commissions at the watercourse level (Art. 8(2))
3
New cards

Under the Bonn Convention, what is the legal distinction between ‘AGREEMENTS’ and ‘joint action’ (MOUs)?

A. AGREEMENTS are concluded between range states only; MOUs may involve any state

B. MOUs are more restrictive than AGREEMENTS because they require all range states to participate

C. AGREEMENTS are legally binding arrangements for which the Bonn Convention provides guidelines; MOUs/joint action are non-legally binding obligations of effort

D. AGREEMENTS may only be signed by states; MOUs may be signed by the Bonn Convention secretariat and NGOs only

C. AGREEMENTS are legally binding arrangements for which the Bonn Convention provides guidelines; MOUs/joint action are non-legally binding obligations of effort
4
New cards

In the LOS Convention, the obligation to cooperate in Article 63(1) regarding stocks that migrate between EEZs is formulated as:

A. An obligation of result — states ‘shall cooperate’

B. An obligation of effort — states ‘shall seek to agree’

C. An absolute obligation — states must establish an RFMO

D. A discretionary measure — states ‘may cooperate’

B. An obligation of effort — states ‘shall seek to agree’
5
New cards

Which of the following correctly describes the decision-making rule under Montreal Protocol Art. 2(9) for phasing out ozone-depleting substances?

A. Where consensus cannot be obtained, decisions may be adopted by a two-thirds majority and are binding on all parties — including those who voted against

B. Decisions require unanimous consent of all parties

C. Decisions are legally binding only for parties who voted in favour

D. Decisions are adopted by simple majority but are non-binding on all parties

A. Where consensus cannot be obtained, decisions may be adopted by a two-thirds majority and are binding on all parties — including those who voted against
6
New cards

What is the significance of the ECJ's ruling in Commission v. France (Case C-182/89) for understanding COP decisions?

A. It confirmed that COP decisions under CITES are legally binding on all WTO members

B. It held that France was required to implement CITES COP decisions as directly effective EU law

C. It ruled that CITES secretariat notifications create binding obligations under international law

D. It established that a legally non-binding COP decision may achieve legal significance if a court links it to relevant domestic or EU legislation

D. It established that a legally non-binding COP decision may achieve legal significance if a court links it to relevant domestic or EU legislation
7
New cards

The IPCC's institutional relationship to the UNFCCC regime is best described as:

A. The IPCC is a subsidiary body of the UNFCCC established under the convention

B. The IPCC is a joint body of the UNFCCC COP and the WMO General Assembly with co-equal governance

C. The IPCC is an institution not established by the UNFCCC but that nevertheless plays a central role in it, providing expert peer-review advice on climate change

D. The IPCC is the scientific advisory body to the UNFCCC COP, established by the Kyoto Protocol

C. The IPCC is an institution not established by the UNFCCC but that nevertheless plays a central role in it, providing expert peer-review advice on climate change
8
New cards

Why was the GEF restructured in 1994?

A. Developed states demanded greater control over GEF project selection to protect their financial contributions

B. Developing states refused to accept the GEF as the financial mechanism for the Biodiversity Convention and UNFCCC because it was controlled solely by the World Bank

C. The World Bank unilaterally increased the GEF's mandate beyond its original climate and biodiversity scope

D. UNEP and UNDP withdrew from the GEF because they disagreed with the World Bank's project selection criteria

B. Developing states refused to accept the GEF as the financial mechanism for the Biodiversity Convention and UNFCCC because it was controlled solely by the World Bank
9
New cards

Which of the following correctly describes the GEF's legal personality?

A. The GEF has no legal personality under international law — the World Bank represents it de jure in signing agreements

B. The GEF has full legal personality under international law as an independent international organisation

C. The GEF has legal personality under the laws of the United States, where it is incorporated

D. The GEF has legal personality granted by the UNFCCC and Biodiversity Convention jointly

A. The GEF has no legal personality under international law — the World Bank represents it de jure in signing agreements
10
New cards

The Fish Stocks Agreement requires states managing straddling and highly migratory stocks to:

A. Conclude a global treaty specifying total allowable catches for each species

B. Obtain FAO approval before establishing any fishing regulations

C. Submit their national fisheries regulations to the LOS Convention COP for review

D. Enter into arrangements or establish a Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (RFMO) and implement a precautionary conservation and management regime

D. Enter into arrangements or establish a Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (RFMO) and implement a precautionary conservation and management regime
11
New cards

Which institution is described as administering the secretariat of both the UNFCCC/Kyoto Protocol and the Desertification Convention?

A. UNEP in Nairobi

B. UNESCO in Paris

C. The United Nations (Bonn, Germany)

D. The World Bank in Washington D.C.

C. The United Nations (Bonn, Germany)
12
New cards

The ‘additionality’ requirement in CDM projects means:

A. CDM project investments must provide GHG reductions additional to those that would have been achieved in the absence of the CDM investment

B. Developing states must contribute additional national funds to CDM projects over and above GEF funding

C. Each CDM project must additionally comply with Kyoto Protocol Art. 12 and a separate UNFCCC COP decision

D. CDM projects must reduce emissions in addition to biodiversity and other environmental objectives

A. CDM project investments must provide GHG reductions additional to those that would have been achieved in the absence of the CDM investment
13
New cards

The 'opting-out procedure’ in MEAs such as CITES and the Rotterdam Convention serves what purpose?

A. It allows developing states to opt out of all financial obligations under the MEA

B. It permits secretariats to opt out of implementing COP decisions they consider inconsistent with the treaty

C. It allows NGO observers to formally dissent from COP decisions and have their objection recorded

D. It allows states to avoid participating in majority-adopted decisions that amend the MEA's annexes or regulations, by notifying the secretariat that they do not wish to be bound

D. It allows states to avoid participating in majority-adopted decisions that amend the MEA's annexes or regulations, by notifying the secretariat that they do not wish to be bound
14
New cards

What is the primary practical significance of the ‘synergies’ between MEAs?

A. Synergies allow the COP of one MEA to adopt legally binding decisions under another MEA

B. Synergies mean that action taken to address one environmental problem also addresses others, allowing a single measure to serve multiple MEA obligations simultaneously

C. Synergies require states to merge their national implementation mechanisms for overlapping MEAs

D. Synergies provide a legal basis for the UNEP to override decisions of individual MEA COPs

B. Synergies mean that action taken to address one environmental problem also addresses others, allowing a single measure to serve multiple MEA obligations simultaneously
15
New cards

The textbook's critical assessment of the World Bank's role in IEL institutional structures suggests that:

A. The World Bank has effectively replaced UNEP as the primary IEL institution

B. The institutional coordination provided by the World Bank is comprehensive and addresses both developed and developing states equally

C. While developing states successfully reconceptualised environmental problems as socio-economic problems, the resulting enhanced influence of the World Bank in developing states may compromise the promise of justice inherent in IEL principles

D. The World Bank's involvement is constitutionally prohibited by the UN Charter, making its role in GEF governance legally questionable

C. While developing states successfully reconceptualised environmental problems as socio-economic problems, the resulting enhanced influence of the World Bank in developing states may compromise the promise of justice inherent in IEL principles