1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Nadler (2002)
Two types of helping: dependency-oriented, autonomy-oriented
Nadler (2006)
Helping relations are inherently unequal
Tauber (2010)
3 motives for in-groups helping out-groups: power, meaning, impression formation
Van Leeuwen (2007)
Meaning - appealing to Dutch pride more effective to motivate helping for Dutch high-identifiers
Jonas (2002)
Scrooge effect, meaning, want to think their group is needed
Tomasello (2006)
Born predisposed to help others
Batson (1983)
Emphatic concern, empathy-altruism link, shocking confederate
Cialdini (1997)
Selfish motivations, feel bad if they don’t help
Other variables like perceived one-ness
Concern for in-group was accidentally tested in this study as all ppt are students
Methodological issues - how would you act if told to read note leaving out emotion, or read focusing on emotion
Cikara (2011)
Lack of empathy is a sign of intergroup failing
Kogut (2007)
Tsunami, named all victims, participants gave more to ingroup
Small (2007)
Told participants about identifiable victim explanation, they became less pro-social, gave less money to everyone
Jenni (1997)
IVE explained by proportion of effect perceived
Erlandsson (2015)
Argues IVE is due to vividness
Lee (2017)
Emotions play a big role in IVE, manipulating emotions increased helping
Basil (2006)
Guilt strongest effect, replicated and found guilt mediated empathy
James (2017)
In-group perpetrator and in-group victim = most generous and most empathy
Clark (2002)
When told overall donation amount no change in donation, when told others individual donation it led to more donations
Fehr (2002)
Not donating in cooperation game led to punishment and negative evaluation from other participants
Petri (2004)
Participants increased donations by 59% if their identity was visible
Barclay (2004)
Making large donations is a sign of political leadership and positive evaluations
Grace (2006)
Participants give more when wearing charity ribbons
West (2004)
Conspicuous compassion
Alpizar (2008)
Donors give more when with friends vs alone - critical thinking
Zagefka (2017)
Not that we help outgroups less we just help them for different reasons