Intergroup helping Researchers

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/23

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 11:44 AM on 5/4/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

24 Terms

1
New cards

Nadler (2002)

Two types of helping: dependency-oriented, autonomy-oriented

2
New cards

Nadler (2006)

Helping relations are inherently unequal

3
New cards

Tauber (2010)

3 motives for in-groups helping out-groups: power, meaning, impression formation

4
New cards

Van Leeuwen (2007)

Meaning - appealing to Dutch pride more effective to motivate helping for Dutch high-identifiers

5
New cards

Jonas (2002)

Scrooge effect, meaning, want to think their group is needed

6
New cards

Tomasello (2006)

Born predisposed to help others

7
New cards

Batson (1983)

Emphatic concern, empathy-altruism link, shocking confederate

8
New cards

Cialdini (1997)

Selfish motivations, feel bad if they don’t help

Other variables like perceived one-ness

Concern for in-group was accidentally tested in this study as all ppt are students

Methodological issues - how would you act if told to read note leaving out emotion, or read focusing on emotion

9
New cards

Cikara (2011)

Lack of empathy is a sign of intergroup failing

10
New cards

Kogut (2007)

Tsunami, named all victims, participants gave more to ingroup

11
New cards

Small (2007)

Told participants about identifiable victim explanation, they became less pro-social, gave less money to everyone

12
New cards

Jenni (1997)

IVE explained by proportion of effect perceived

13
New cards

Erlandsson (2015)

Argues IVE is due to vividness

14
New cards

Lee (2017)

Emotions play a big role in IVE, manipulating emotions increased helping

15
New cards

Basil (2006)

Guilt strongest effect, replicated and found guilt mediated empathy

16
New cards

James (2017)

In-group perpetrator and in-group victim = most generous and most empathy

17
New cards

Clark (2002)

When told overall donation amount no change in donation, when told others individual donation it led to more donations

18
New cards

Fehr (2002)

Not donating in cooperation game led to punishment and negative evaluation from other participants

19
New cards

Petri (2004)

Participants increased donations by 59% if their identity was visible

20
New cards

Barclay (2004)

Making large donations is a sign of political leadership and positive evaluations

21
New cards

Grace (2006)

Participants give more when wearing charity ribbons

22
New cards

West (2004)

Conspicuous compassion

23
New cards

Alpizar (2008)

Donors give more when with friends vs alone - critical thinking

24
New cards

Zagefka (2017)

Not that we help outgroups less we just help them for different reasons