4) factors effecting eyewitness testimony

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/29

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 8:27 PM on 5/25/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

30 Terms

1
New cards

What does eyewitness testimony refer to?

The ability to recall events that one has seen or experienced

2
New cards

What are leading questions?

questions that suggest or encourage a particular answer

3
New cards

What’ the response bias explanation for leading questions?

Questions influence how we decide to answer

4
New cards

What’s memory substitution explanation for leading questions?

The question actually changes the memory

5
New cards

What’s was the procedure of Loftus and Palmer (1974)?

45 American students were shown 7 films of traffic accidents, a critical question was asked “how fast were the cards going when they _ each other?”

6
New cards

What were the experimental design/method of Loftus and Palmer (1974) experiment?

Independent design group with five conditions

7
New cards

What was the IV in Loftus and Palmer (1974) experiment?

A critical question that was phrased differently for different conditions

8
New cards

What were the verbs used in Loftus and Palmer (1974) for the critical question?

Smashed/collided/bumped/hit/contacted

9
New cards

What conclusion was drawn in Loftus and Palmer (1974) experiment?

When the verb used was more ‘violent’ the faster they think the car went

10
New cards

What is memory conformity?

When co-witnesses go along with each other, either to win social approval or because they believe the other witnesses are right and they are wrong

11
New cards

How can memories of event be altered/contaminated?

Discussing the events with others (post event discussion)

12
New cards

How does memory contamination occur?

During discussion when witnesses may combine (mis)information from other witnesses with their own memory

13
New cards

What was Gebbert (2003) procedure?

Participants were put into pairs where each partner watch a video of the same crime but filmed from different pov. In one condition, pairs then discussed the event before each completing a test to recall the events they had just watched

14
New cards

What were the findings of Gabbert (2003) experiment?

71% of participants who had discussed event with their partners, mistakenly recalled items discussed by the other partner which they did not see in the video, whilst in a control group, the corresponding figure was 0%

15
New cards

What did Gabbert (2003) concluded in his experiment

That witness displayed memory conformity

16
New cards

Why is it a disadvantage that research into leading questions and post event discussion use artificial tasks?

They lack mundane realism which brings internal validity into questions

17
New cards

What are the contradictory findings of the effect of leading questions and post when discussion on eye witness testimony?

Yuille and Cutshall (1986) found that witnesses had very accurate memories of highly stressful event and were resistant to the effects of misleading questions

18
New cards

why does eye witness testimony research have real world application?

Because the criminal justice system relies heavily on eyewitness identification for investigating and prosecuting crimes

19
New cards
term image

The Yerkes-Dodson law

20
New cards

What was the procedure of Yuille and Cutshall (1986) case study?

In an actual crime, a gun shop owner shot a thief dead, 13 witnesses agreed to participate in the study. Witnesses rated how stressed they felt at the time of the incident.

21
New cards

What were the findings of Yuille and Cutshall (1986) case study?

Witnesses were very accurate in recall and there was little change when re-interviewing five months later, even with misleading questions. Participants who reported the highest level of stress were most accurate (88%) compared to the 75% of the less stressed group

22
New cards

What’s the weapon focus effect?

When anxiety causes the witness to focus on central details(a weapon) rather than what’s going on, which decreases the ability of the witness to institute the offender

23
New cards

What were the procedure if Johnson and Scott (1976) experiment?

Where participants sat in a waiting room and were led to believe they were talking part in a lab study. In the low anxiety condition, a conversation happened and a man walked out with a pen and grease in his hand. In the high anxiety condition, participants heard a heated argument with class breaking and a man walking out holding a knife with blood

24
New cards

What were the findings of Johnson and Scott (1976) experiment?

49% of participants in the low anxiety condition could later identify the man from 50 photos compared to only 33% in group 2

25
New cards

What was the aim of Pickel (1998) experiment?

That weapon focus may be to do with unusualness rather than anxiety

26
New cards

What were the procedure of Pickel (1998) experiment?

Showed participants a video that f an incident in a hair salon before being asked to recall the events. Five conditions (what the man was holding) was used. Scissors, gun, wallet, raw whole chicken and empty (control group)

27
New cards

What were the results of Pickel (1998) experiment?

When the man held more unusual objects, memory recall was worst

28
New cards

What was the procedure of Valentine and Mesout (2009)?

They used heart rate to divide visitors to the London Dungeon’s labyrinth into low and high anxiety group

29
New cards

What were the conditions of Valentine and Mesout (2009) experiment?

High anxiety participant were less accurate than low anxiety participants in describing and identifying a target person

30
New cards

Why is it a disadvantage that research into effect of anxiety on eye witness testimony usually uses interview of real life eye witnesses?

Multiple factors can occur in the meantime that the researchers have no control over which may effect results