Midterm

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/81

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 3:48 AM on 6/24/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

82 Terms

1
New cards

What are the three main categories of research?

1. experimental

2. exploratory

3. descriptive

2
New cards

experimental type of research def

How well are the variables controlled?

3
New cards

exploratory type of research def

How do these variables relate to each other?

4
New cards

descriptive research type def

What does this observed phenomenon mean?

5
New cards

What is the highest and lowest levels of hierarchy of evidence?

highest: level 1a - SR/MA of RCT's

lowest: level 5 - clinical experience, expert opinion, mechanism-based reasoning

6
New cards

Why is level 1a high on the hierarchy of evidence?

because there is a lot of controls

7
New cards

Should a PT continue a treatment that aligns with a patient's values and our expertise and seems effective, even if there is no evidence to support it?

Yes, because the treatment hasn't been shown to cause harm

8
New cards

What are the three principles of ethics?

respect for persons

beneficence

justice

9
New cards

respect for persons (principles of ethics) def

informed consent

autonomy, protection of vulnerable populations

10
New cards

Who are vulnerable populations with respect to persons?

children, older people, inmates, pregnant women

11
New cards

beneficence (principle of ethics) def

that the benefits for the patient outweigh the risks

12
New cards

justice (principles of ethics) def

fairness in the distribution of benefits/burdens

13
New cards

outcome of the nuremberg code in 1949

first formal guidelines

voluntary consent to participate

14
New cards

outcome of the declaration of helsinki in 1964

independent review of protocols

15
New cards

outcome of the national research act of 1974

institutional review board (IRB)

16
New cards

outcome of the belmont report in 1979

the common rule

17
New cards

What does the common rule include?

respect for persons

beneficence

justice

18
New cards

What are the 4 levels of measurement?

nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio

19
New cards

probability def in sampling methods

An element of random chance, someone can be selected

20
New cards

What are the 2 outcomes in probability?

improve the generalizability of the results

less feasible (harder to recruit but better for results)

21
New cards

Nonprobability in sampling methods

no element of random chance

22
New cards

What are the 2 outcomes in nonprobability?

limited generalizability (population can be over-represented)

more feasible

23
New cards

Example of simple random sampling

flipping a coin or spinning a wheel

24
New cards

Example of systematic sampling

started randomly, but they have a system

ex: start randomly, but they pick every 6th person

25
New cards

Example of stratified sampling

people are divided by trait rather than randomly picked

26
New cards

Example of convenience sampling

picking people that are convient to you

27
New cards

When do you use stratified or quota sampling?

When you want the representation of a subgroup

28
New cards

When do you use cluster sampling?

when the population is geographically dispersed

29
New cards

When do you use purposive sampling?

when you need specific characteristics

30
New cards

When do you use a convenience sample?

When you want to recruit everyone eligible as they arrive

31
New cards

what is operational definitions?

how you turn an idea/concept into something you can measure

32
New cards

multi-factor vs multi-variant

multi-factor has 2 or more INdependent variables

multi-variant has 2 or more DEpendent variables

33
New cards

simple def of reliability

getting similar results when nothing has changed

34
New cards

intra-rater reliability def

same person measuring the same thing at different points in time

35
New cards

inter-rater reliability def

different people measuring the same thing at the same time

36
New cards

What is relative reliability

consistency of individual scores relative to each other

37
New cards

What are examples of relative reliability?

intra-rater, inter-rater, test-retest, internal consistency

38
New cards

What do we use to measure relative reliability?

measure with ICC/Kappa, and Cronbach's alpha

39
New cards

Does relative reliability quantify how much a score will vary for an individual?

NO

40
New cards

What is absolute reliability?

the consistency of an individual score, regardless of how it compares to other scores

41
New cards

What are examples of absolute reliability?

standard error of measurement

ties to MDC

42
New cards

Do reliability coefficients have units?

No - they are useless

43
New cards

In the equation rxx = true score variability/true score variability + error variability, what does the top mean?

The difference between individuals

44
New cards

In the equation rxx = true score variability /(true score variability + error variability), what does the bottom term mean?

difference within individuals

45
New cards

When error makes up a large part of the true score variability, what happens to the reliability?

It deflates the reliability

46
New cards

Does rxx become larger when the true variance increases?

Yes, as long as the error is held constant

47
New cards

Can an outcome measure be very reliable but not responsive?

yes but it isn't very common

48
New cards

MDC def

value at which the observed change is NOT measurement error

49
New cards

What is minimal detectable change (MDC)?

When the change is real but not clinically meaningful

50
New cards

What is the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)

when the change is real and clinically significant

51
New cards

MCID def

The ability of an instrument to detect minimally important change

52
New cards

What is the relationship between internal consistency and split-half reliability?

Slip-half reliability is a measure of internal consistency

53
New cards

simple definition of validity

when the measurement is right (or compared to the gold standard)

54
New cards

difference between reliability and validity?

Reliability = consistency of a measurement

validity = alignment of the measurement with a targeted construct

55
New cards

What is face validity?

When an instrument appears to test what it is intended to test,

It is judged by the users of a test after the test is developed

56
New cards

Face validity is judged by those who _____ the instrument

USE

57
New cards

What are the 3 C's of validity?

contect

construct

criterion-related

58
New cards

What does construct validity look at?

If measurements represent the concept

59
New cards

What is content validity used for

usually in questionnaire development

60
New cards

Content validity is judged by those who ____ the instrument

DEVELOP

61
New cards

What is the similarity between face validity and content validity?

There are no statistics to measure either type of validity

62
New cards

Criterion-related validity def

Can the outcomes of the instrument or index test be substituted for an established gold standard

63
New cards

What are the 2 types of criterion-related validity?

concurrent and predictive validity

64
New cards

concurrent validity def

Scores from a new measure correlate with scores from a well-established measure administered AT THE SAME TIME

65
New cards

predictive validity def

establishes that the outcome of the target test can be used to predict a future criterion score or outcome

66
New cards

Construct validity def

reflects the ability of an instrument to measure the theoretical dimensions of a construct

67
New cards

What are the 3 types of construct validity?

known-group method

convergence

divergence

68
New cards

What does the known-group method test?

tests if the results differ between 2 groups that are known to be different

69
New cards

What does convergence show

If there is a correlation between 2 constructs

70
New cards

What does divergence show?

show that there isn't a correlation between 2 constructs

71
New cards

What mistakes are made when researchers interpret validity evidence

1. treating it as "all or none"

2. assuming reliability also implies validity

3. confusing a strong correlation as "proof"

4. Overgeneralizing weak evidence

72
New cards

Can reliability and validity change over time

yes

73
New cards

How does reliability change over time

Raters become trained, equipment wears out, and testing procedures change

74
New cards

How does validity change over time

new evidence can emerge that shows the measurement behaves differently than expect, or clinical practice evolves

75
New cards

What are the characteristics of a true experimental design?

1. The independent variable is manipulated by the experimenter

2. Include a control or comparison group

3. Participants are randomly assigned to groups

76
New cards

What is external validity?

What can you do with the results outside the study

77
New cards

What is internal validity?

What happens inside the study to affect the causal relationship

78
New cards

What are threats to internal validity?

testing

instrumentation

maturation

history

selection

regression to the mean

79
New cards

What is random sampling

How do we obtain the people participating in the study

80
New cards

What is random assignment?

How we form our groups in our study

81
New cards

What is concealed allocation?

not knowing which group someone is assigned to when eligibility is determined

82
New cards

What is random assignment (in relation to concealed allocation)

not knowing which group someone will be in when determining intervention